Literature DB >> 18172698

A screening questionnaire to predict no return to work within 3 months for low back pain claimants.

Marc Du Bois1, Peter Donceel2.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to develop a short prediction questionnaire for estimating the risk of no return to work (RTW) within 3 months of sick leave to facilitate triage and management of a patient population of subacute low-back pain (LBP) sufferers. We conducted a prospective study with a 3-month follow-up on 186 patients with LBP introducing a claim for sickness benefits to the largest sickness fund in Belgium. Patients completed a screening questionnaire within 2 weeks after claim submission. All patients were invited for clinical assessment, at 6-8 weeks of sick leave, by the medical adviser. Patients' work status was recorded by the sickness fund. About 20% of the patients did not resume work at 3 months' sick leave. They were more likely to experience pain below the knee, to have an own previous prediction of a 100% no RTW and to have a severe interference of pain on daily activities. The screening tool based on these three items correctly classified 73.7% of the non-resumers and 78.4% of the resumers at a cut-off score of 0.22. The findings of this study provide evidence of the utility of a short screening questionnaire for future use in intervention studies in a social security setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18172698      PMCID: PMC2270393          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0567-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

1.  Advances in the field of low back pain in primary care: a report from the fourth international forum.

Authors:  Jeffrey Borkan; Maurits Van Tulder; Shmuel Reis; Mark L Schoene; Peter Croft; Doron Hermoni
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review.

Authors:  G Waddell; A K Burton
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 3.  The economic burden of low back pain: a review of studies published between 1996 and 2001.

Authors:  Andreas Maetzel; Linda Li
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.098

4.  The back pain beliefs of health care providers: are we fear-avoidant?

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Johan Vlaeyen; Raymond Ostelo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-12

Review 5.  Strategies for prevention and management of musculoskeletal conditions. Low back pain (non-specific).

Authors:  M Krismer; M van Tulder
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes--a prospective study.

Authors:  Donald C Cole; Michael V Mondloch; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Katja Boersma
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  An evaluation of prompt access to physiotherapy in the management of low back pain in primary care.

Authors:  Mark A Pinnington; Julia Miller; Ian Stanley
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 9.  Low back pain interventions at the workplace: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Torill H Tveito; Mari Hysing; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.611

10.  Return to work after rehabilitation. The significance of the patient's own prediction.

Authors:  J Sandström; E Esbjörnsson
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1986
View more
  16 in total

1.  A decade's experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Marc Du Bois; Marek Szpalski; Peter Donceel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Individual expectation: an overlooked, but pertinent, factor in the treatment of individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06-30

3.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

4.  What do you expect? Catastrophizing mediates associations between expectancies and pain-facilitatory processes.

Authors:  Junie S Carriere; Marc Olivier Martel; Samantha M Meints; Marise C Cornelius; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.931

5.  The Mediating Role of Recovery Expectancies on the Relation Between Depression and Return-to-Work.

Authors:  Junie S Carriere; Pascal Thibault; Michael J L Sullivan
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-06

6.  Improved Expectations About Length of Sick Leave During Occupational Rehabilitation Is Associated with Increased Work Participation.

Authors:  Lene Aasdahl; Kristine Pape; Ottar Vasseljen; Roar Johnsen; Marius Steiro Fimland
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2019-09

7.  Absenteeism screening questionnaire (ASQ): a new tool for predicting long-term absenteeism among workers with low back pain.

Authors:  Manon Truchon; Marie-Ève Schmouth; Denis Côté; Lise Fillion; Michel Rossignol; Marie-José Durand
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

8.  Predictive ability of a modified Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in an acute/subacute low back pain working population.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Markus Melloh; Michael Yelland; Brendan Burkett; Anne Roiko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Measures of patients' expectations about recovery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shanil Ebrahim; Cindy Malachowski; Mostafa Kamal El Din; Sohail M Mulla; Luis Montoya; Sheena Bance; Jason W Busse
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-03

10.  Sick leave due to back pain in a cohort of young workers.

Authors:  A Van Nieuwenhuyse; A Burdorf; G Crombez; G Verbeke; R Masschelein; Ph Mairiaux; G F Moens
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.