Literature DB >> 22652152

Potential impact of adding genetic markers to clinical parameters in predicting prostate biopsy outcomes in men following an initial negative biopsy: findings from the REDUCE trial.

A Karim Kader1, Jielin Sun, Brian H Reck, Paul J Newcombe, Seong-Tae Kim, Fang-Chi Hsu, Ralph B D'Agostino, Sha Tao, Zheng Zhang, Aubrey R Turner, Greg T Platek, Colin F Spraggs, John C Whittaker, Brian R Lane, William B Isaacs, Deborah A Meyers, Eugene R Bleecker, Frank M Torti, Jeffery M Trent, John D McConnell, S Lilly Zheng, Lynn D Condreay, Roger S Rittmaster, Jianfeng Xu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several germline single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been consistently associated with prostate cancer (PCa) risk.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is an improvement in PCa risk prediction by adding these SNPs to existing predictors of PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Subjects included men in the placebo arm of the randomized Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) trial in whom germline DNA was available. All men had an initial negative prostate biopsy and underwent study-mandated biopsies at 2 yr and 4 yr. Predictive performance of baseline clinical parameters and/or a genetic score based on 33 established PCa risk-associated SNPs was evaluated. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were used to compare different models with different predictors. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess changes in risk prediction by adding genetic markers. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 1654 men, genetic score was a significant predictor of positive biopsy, even after adjusting for known clinical variables and family history (p = 3.41 × 10(-8)). The AUC for the genetic score exceeded that of any other PCa predictor at 0.59. Adding the genetic score to the best clinical model improved the AUC from 0.62 to 0.66 (p<0.001), reclassified PCa risk in 33% of men (NRI: 0.10; p=0.002), resulted in higher net benefit from DCA, and decreased the number of biopsies needed to detect the same number of PCa instances. The benefit of adding the genetic score was greatest among men at intermediate risk (25th percentile to 75th percentile). Similar results were found for high-grade (Gleason score ≥ 7) PCa. A major limitation of this study was its focus on white patients only.
CONCLUSIONS: Adding genetic markers to current clinical parameters may improve PCa risk prediction. The improvement is modest but may be helpful for better determining the need for repeat prostate biopsy. The clinical impact of these results requires further study.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22652152      PMCID: PMC3568765          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  30 in total

1.  Common sequence variants on 2p15 and Xp11.22 confer susceptibility to prostate cancer.

Authors:  Julius Gudmundsson; Patrick Sulem; Thorunn Rafnar; Jon T Bergthorsson; Andrei Manolescu; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Kristrun R Benediktsdottir; Thorarinn Blondal; Margret Jakobsdottir; Simon N Stacey; Jelena Kostic; Kari T Kristinsson; Birgitta Birgisdottir; Shyamali Ghosh; Droplaug N Magnusdottir; Steinunn Thorlacius; Gudmar Thorleifsson; S Lilly Zheng; Jielin Sun; Bao-Li Chang; J Bradford Elmore; Joan P Breyer; Kate M McReynolds; Kevin M Bradley; Brian L Yaspan; Fredrik Wiklund; Par Stattin; Sara Lindström; Hans-Olov Adami; Shannon K McDonnell; Daniel J Schaid; Julie M Cunningham; Liang Wang; James R Cerhan; Jennifer L St Sauver; Sara D Isaacs; Kathleen E Wiley; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; Sonia Polo; Manuel Ruiz-Echarri; Sebastian Navarrete; Fernando Fuertes; Berta Saez; Javier Godino; Philip C Weijerman; Dorine W Swinkels; Katja K Aben; J Alfred Witjes; Brian K Suarez; Brian T Helfand; Michael L Frigge; Kristleifur Kristjansson; Carole Ober; Eirikur Jonsson; Gudmundur V Einarsson; Jianfeng Xu; Henrik Gronberg; Jeffrey R Smith; Stephen N Thibodeau; William B Isaacs; William J Catalona; Jose I Mayordomo; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Rosa B Barkardottir; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Augustine Kong; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Estimation of absolute risk for prostate cancer using genetic markers and family history.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xu; Jielin Sun; A Karim Kader; Sara Lindström; Fredrik Wiklund; Fang-Chi Hsu; Jan-Erik Johansson; S Lilly Zheng; Gilles Thomas; Richard B Hayes; Peter Kraft; David J Hunter; Stephen J Chanock; William B Isaacs; Henrik Grönberg
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  Urine TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcript stratifies prostate cancer risk in men with elevated serum PSA.

Authors:  Scott A Tomlins; Sheila M J Aubin; Javed Siddiqui; Robert J Lonigro; Laurie Sefton-Miller; Siobhan Miick; Sarah Williamsen; Petrea Hodge; Jessica Meinke; Amy Blase; Yvonne Penabella; John R Day; Radhika Varambally; Bo Han; David Wood; Lei Wang; Martin G Sanda; Mark A Rubin; Daniel R Rhodes; Brent Hollenbeck; Kyoko Sakamoto; Jonathan L Silberstein; Yves Fradet; James B Amberson; Stephanie Meyers; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Harry Rittenhouse; John T Wei; Jack Groskopf; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  PCA3 molecular urine test for predicting repeat prostate biopsy outcome in populations at risk: validation in the placebo arm of the dutasteride REDUCE trial.

Authors:  Sheila M J Aubin; Jennifer Reid; Mark J Sarno; Amy Blase; Jacqueline Aussie; Harry Rittenhouse; Roger Rittmaster; Gerald L Andriole; Jack Groskopf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Genome-wide association and replication studies identify four variants associated with prostate cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Julius Gudmundsson; Patrick Sulem; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Thorarinn Blondal; Arnaldur Gylfason; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Kristrun R Benediktsdottir; Droplaug N Magnusdottir; Gudbjorg Orlygsdottir; Margret Jakobsdottir; Simon N Stacey; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Tiina Wahlfors; Teuvo Tammela; Joan P Breyer; Kate M McReynolds; Kevin M Bradley; Berta Saez; Javier Godino; Sebastian Navarrete; Fernando Fuertes; Laura Murillo; Eduardo Polo; Katja K Aben; Inge M van Oort; Brian K Suarez; Brian T Helfand; Donghui Kan; Carlo Zanon; Michael L Frigge; Kristleifur Kristjansson; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Gudmundur V Einarsson; Eirikur Jonsson; William J Catalona; Jose I Mayordomo; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Jeffrey R Smith; Johanna Schleutker; Rosa B Barkardottir; Augustine Kong; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Thorunn Rafnar; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Identification of seven new prostate cancer susceptibility loci through a genome-wide association study.

Authors:  Rosalind A Eeles; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Ali Amin Al Olama; Graham G Giles; Michelle Guy; Gianluca Severi; Kenneth Muir; John L Hopper; Brian E Henderson; Christopher A Haiman; Johanna Schleutker; Freddie C Hamdy; David E Neal; Jenny L Donovan; Janet L Stanford; Elaine A Ostrander; Sue A Ingles; Esther M John; Stephen N Thibodeau; Daniel Schaid; Jong Y Park; Amanda Spurdle; Judith Clements; Joanne L Dickinson; Christiane Maier; Walther Vogel; Thilo Dörk; Timothy R Rebbeck; Kathleen A Cooney; Lisa Cannon-Albright; Pierre O Chappuis; Pierre Hutter; Maurice Zeegers; Radka Kaneva; Hong-Wei Zhang; Yong-Jie Lu; William D Foulkes; Dallas R English; Daniel A Leongamornlert; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Jonathan Morrison; Audrey T Ardern-Jones; Amanda L Hall; Lynne T O'Brien; Rosemary A Wilkinson; Edward J Saunders; Elizabeth C Page; Emma J Sawyer; Stephen M Edwards; David P Dearnaley; Alan Horwich; Robert A Huddart; Vincent S Khoo; Christopher C Parker; Nicholas Van As; Christopher J Woodhouse; Alan Thompson; Tim Christmas; Chris Ogden; Colin S Cooper; Melissa C Southey; Artitaya Lophatananon; Jo-Fen Liu; Laurence N Kolonel; Loic Le Marchand; Tiina Wahlfors; Teuvo L Tammela; Anssi Auvinen; Sarah J Lewis; Angela Cox; Liesel M FitzGerald; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Danielle M Karyadi; Erika M Kwon; Mariana C Stern; Roman Corral; Amit D Joshi; Ahva Shahabi; Shannon K McDonnell; Thomas A Sellers; Julio Pow-Sang; Suzanne Chambers; Joanne Aitken; R A Frank Gardiner; Jyotsna Batra; Mary Anne Kedda; Felicity Lose; Andrea Polanowski; Briony Patterson; Jürgen Serth; Andreas Meyer; Manuel Luedeke; Klara Stefflova; Anna M Ray; Ethan M Lange; Jim Farnham; Humera Khan; Chavdar Slavov; Atanaska Mitkova; Guangwen Cao; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Individual and cumulative effect of prostate cancer risk-associated variants on clinicopathologic variables in 5,895 prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  A Karim Kader; Jielin Sun; Sarah D Isaacs; Kathleen E Wiley; Guifang Yan; Seong-Tae Kim; Helen Fedor; Angelo M DeMarzo; Jonathan I Epstein; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin; Bruce Trock; S Lilly Zheng; Jianfeng Xu; William Isaacs
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 4.104

9.  Multiple newly identified loci associated with prostate cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Rosalind A Eeles; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Graham G Giles; Ali Amin Al Olama; Michelle Guy; Sarah K Jugurnauth; Shani Mulholland; Daniel A Leongamornlert; Stephen M Edwards; Jonathan Morrison; Helen I Field; Melissa C Southey; Gianluca Severi; Jenny L Donovan; Freddie C Hamdy; David P Dearnaley; Kenneth R Muir; Charmaine Smith; Melisa Bagnato; Audrey T Ardern-Jones; Amanda L Hall; Lynne T O'Brien; Beatrice N Gehr-Swain; Rosemary A Wilkinson; Angie Cox; Sarah Lewis; Paul M Brown; Sameer G Jhavar; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Artitaya Lophatananon; Sarah L Bryant; Alan Horwich; Robert A Huddart; Vincent S Khoo; Christopher C Parker; Christopher J Woodhouse; Alan Thompson; Tim Christmas; Chris Ogden; Cyril Fisher; Charles Jamieson; Colin S Cooper; Dallas R English; John L Hopper; David E Neal; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Elena B Elkin; Mithat Gonen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  50 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: does genetic score justify early prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Toru Sugihara; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Ratio of prostate specific antigen to the outer gland volume of prostrate as a predictor for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hai-Min Zhang; Yang Yan; Fang Wang; Wen-Yu Gu; Guang-Hui Hu; Jun-Hua Zheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-08-15

3.  Do environmental factors modify the genetic risk of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sarah B Peskoe; Corinne E Joshu; Wen-Yi Huang; Richard B Hayes; H Ballentine Carter; William B Isaacs; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  A genetic-based approach to personalized prostate cancer screening and treatment.

Authors:  Brian T Helfand; William J Catalona; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

5.  Validation of the novel susceptibility loci for prostate cancer in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Yishuo Wu; Haitao Chen; Ying Ji; Rong Na; Zengnan Mo; Dingwei Ye; Meilin Wang; Jun Qi; Xiaoling Lin; Qiang Ding; Jianfeng Xu; S Lilly Zheng; Yinghao Sun; Wei Meng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Differences in inherited risk among relatives of hereditary prostate cancer patients using genetic risk score.

Authors:  Brian T Helfand; Haitao Chen; Richard J Fantus; Carly A Conran; Charles B Brendler; Siquan Lilly Zheng; Patrick C Walsh; William B Isaacs; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Adding genetic risk score to family history identifies twice as many high-risk men for prostate cancer: Results from the prostate cancer prevention trial.

Authors:  Haitao Chen; Xu Liu; Charles B Brendler; Donna P Ankerst; Robin J Leach; Phyllis J Goodman; M Scott Lucia; Catherine M Tangen; Li Wang; Fang-Chi Hsu; Jielin Sun; A Karim Kader; William B Isaacs; Brian T Helfand; S Lilly Zheng; Ian M Thompson; Elizabeth A Platz; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.104

8.  Genetic score is an objective and better measurement of inherited risk of prostate cancer than family history.

Authors:  Jielin Sun; Rong Na; Fang-Chi Hsu; S Lilly Zheng; Fredrik Wiklund; Lynn D Condreay; Jeffery M Trent; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Prediction of prostate cancer from prostate biopsy in Chinese men using a genetic score derived from 24 prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs.

Authors:  Haowen Jiang; Fang Liu; Zhong Wang; Rong Na; Limin Zhang; Yishuo Wu; Jie Zheng; Xiaoling Lin; Deke Jiang; Jielin Sun; S Lilly Zheng; Qiang Ding; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Impact of prostate-specific antigen on a baseline prostate cancer risk assessment including genetic risk.

Authors:  A Karim Kader; Michael A Liss; Greg Trottier; Seong-Tae Kim; Jielin Sun; S Lilly Zheng; Karen Chadwick; Gina Lockwood; Jianfeng Xu; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.