BACKGROUND: Twenty-four prostate cancer (PCa) risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Chinese men have been cataloged. We evaluated whether these SNPs can independently predict outcomes of prostate biopsy, and improve the predictive performance of existing clinical variables. METHODS: Three hundred eight consecutive patients that underwent prostate biopsy for detection of PCa at Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China between April 2011 and August 2012 were recruited. Clinical variables such as serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and peripheral blood samples were collected prior to a 10-core biopsy. A genetic score based on these 24 PCa associated SNPs was calculated for each individual. RESULTS: Among 308 patients underwent prostate biopsy, 141 (45.8%) were diagnosed with PCa. Genetic score was significantly higher in patients with PCa (median = 1.30) than without (median = 0.89), P = 3.81 × 10(-6). The difference remained significant after adjusting for age and total PSA, P = 0.007. The PCa detection rate increased with increasing genetic score; 26.3%, 43.2%, and 60.0% for men with lower (<0.5), average (0.5-1.5), and higher (>1.5) genetic score, respectively, P(-trend) = 0.0003. For patients with moderately elevated PSA levels (1.6-20 ng/ml), the PCa detection rate was 31.2% overall and was 16.7%, 31.2%, and 40.9% for men with lower (<0.5), average (0.5-1.5), and higher (>1.5) genetic score, respectively, P(-trend) = 0.03. For patients with PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml, however, the PCa detection rates were high (>69%) regardless of genetic score. CONCLUSION: A genetic score based on PCa risk-associated SNPs is an independent predictor of prostate biopsy outcomes in Chinese men and may be helpful to determine the need for prostate biopsy among patients within a "gray zone" of PCa risk.
BACKGROUND: Twenty-four prostate cancer (PCa) risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Chinese men have been cataloged. We evaluated whether these SNPs can independently predict outcomes of prostate biopsy, and improve the predictive performance of existing clinical variables. METHODS: Three hundred eight consecutive patients that underwent prostate biopsy for detection of PCa at Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China between April 2011 and August 2012 were recruited. Clinical variables such as serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and peripheral blood samples were collected prior to a 10-core biopsy. A genetic score based on these 24 PCa associated SNPs was calculated for each individual. RESULTS: Among 308 patients underwent prostate biopsy, 141 (45.8%) were diagnosed with PCa. Genetic score was significantly higher in patients with PCa (median = 1.30) than without (median = 0.89), P = 3.81 × 10(-6). The difference remained significant after adjusting for age and total PSA, P = 0.007. The PCa detection rate increased with increasing genetic score; 26.3%, 43.2%, and 60.0% for men with lower (<0.5), average (0.5-1.5), and higher (>1.5) genetic score, respectively, P(-trend) = 0.0003. For patients with moderately elevated PSA levels (1.6-20 ng/ml), the PCa detection rate was 31.2% overall and was 16.7%, 31.2%, and 40.9% for men with lower (<0.5), average (0.5-1.5), and higher (>1.5) genetic score, respectively, P(-trend) = 0.03. For patients with PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml, however, the PCa detection rates were high (>69%) regardless of genetic score. CONCLUSION: A genetic score based on PCa risk-associated SNPs is an independent predictor of prostate biopsy outcomes in Chinese men and may be helpful to determine the need for prostate biopsy among patients within a "gray zone" of PCa risk.
Authors: Scott A Tomlins; Daniel R Rhodes; Sven Perner; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Rohit Mehra; Xiao-Wei Sun; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Xuhong Cao; Joelle Tchinda; Rainer Kuefer; Charles Lee; James E Montie; Rajal B Shah; Kenneth J Pienta; Mark A Rubin; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Science Date: 2005-10-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: S Lilly Zheng; Jielin Sun; Fredrik Wiklund; Shelly Smith; Pär Stattin; Ge Li; Hans-Olov Adami; Fang-Chi Hsu; Yi Zhu; Katarina Bälter; A Karim Kader; Aubrey R Turner; Wennuan Liu; Eugene R Bleecker; Deborah A Meyers; David Duggan; John D Carpten; Bao-Li Chang; William B Isaacs; Jianfeng Xu; Henrik Grönberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-01-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jianfeng Xu; Jielin Sun; A Karim Kader; Sara Lindström; Fredrik Wiklund; Fang-Chi Hsu; Jan-Erik Johansson; S Lilly Zheng; Gilles Thomas; Richard B Hayes; Peter Kraft; David J Hunter; Stephen J Chanock; William B Isaacs; Henrik Grönberg Journal: Prostate Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Robert J Macinnis; Antonis C Antoniou; Rosalind A Eeles; Gianluca Severi; Ali Amin Al Olama; Lesley McGuffog; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Michelle Guy; Lynne T O'Brien; Amanda L Hall; Rosemary A Wilkinson; Emma Sawyer; Audrey T Ardern-Jones; David P Dearnaley; Alan Horwich; Vincent S Khoo; Christopher C Parker; Robert A Huddart; Nicholas Van As; Margaret R McCredie; Dallas R English; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper; Douglas F Easton Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: William J Catalona; Alan W Partin; Martin G Sanda; John T Wei; George G Klee; Chris H Bangma; Kevin M Slawin; Leonard S Marks; Stacy Loeb; Dennis L Broyles; Sanghyuk S Shin; Amabelle B Cruz; Daniel W Chan; Lori J Sokoll; William L Roberts; Ron H N van Schaik; Isaac A Mizrahi Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Markus Aly; Fredrik Wiklund; Jianfeng Xu; William B Isaacs; Martin Eklund; Mauro D'Amato; Jan Adolfsson; Henrik Grönberg Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Sheila M J Aubin; Jennifer Reid; Mark J Sarno; Amy Blase; Jacqueline Aussie; Harry Rittenhouse; Roger Rittmaster; Gerald L Andriole; Jack Groskopf Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Lori J Sokoll; Daniel W Chan; Stephen D Mikolajczyk; Harry G Rittenhouse; Cindy L Evans; Harry J Linton; Leslie A Mangold; Phaedre Mohr; Georg Bartsch; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Alan W Partin Journal: Urology Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Jianfeng Xu; W Kyle Resurreccion; Zhuqing Shi; Jun Wei; Chi-Hsiung Wang; S Lilly Zheng; Peter J Hulick; Ashley E Ross; Christian P Pavlovich; Brian T Helfand; William B Isaacs Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 5.455
Authors: Haitao Chen; Xu Liu; Charles B Brendler; Donna P Ankerst; Robin J Leach; Phyllis J Goodman; M Scott Lucia; Catherine M Tangen; Li Wang; Fang-Chi Hsu; Jielin Sun; A Karim Kader; William B Isaacs; Brian T Helfand; S Lilly Zheng; Ian M Thompson; Elizabeth A Platz; Jianfeng Xu Journal: Prostate Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Keum Ji Jung; Daeyoun Won; Christina Jeon; Soriul Kim; Tae Il Kim; Sun Ha Jee; Terri H Beaty Journal: BMC Genet Date: 2015-05-09 Impact factor: 2.797