Chloroquine (CQ) is a cost effective antimalarial drug with a relatively good safety profile (or therapeutic index). However, CQ is no longer used alone to treat patients with Plasmodium falciparum due to the emergence and spread of CQ-resistant strains, also reported for P. vivax. Despite CQ resistance, novel drug candidates based on the structure of CQ continue to be considered, as in the present work. One CQ analog was synthesized as monoquinoline (MAQ) and compared with a previously synthesized bisquinoline (BAQ), both tested against P. falciparum in vitro and against P. berghei in mice, then evaluated in vitro for their cytotoxicity and ability to inhibit hemozoin formation. Their interactions with residues present in the NADH binding site of P falciparum lactate dehydrogenase were evaluated using docking analysis software. Both compounds were active in the nanomolar range evaluated through the HRPII and hypoxanthine tests. MAQ and BAQ derivatives were not toxic, and both compounds significantly inhibited hemozoin formation, in a dose-dependent manner. MAQ had a higher selectivity index than BAQ and both compounds were weak PfLDH inhibitors, a result previously reported also for CQ. Taken together, the two CQ analogues represent promising molecules which seem to act in a crucial point for the parasite, inhibiting hemozoin formation.
Chloroquine (CQ) is a cost effective antimalarial drug with a relatively good safety profile (or therapeutic index). However, CQ is no longer used alone to treat patients with Plasmodium falciparum due to the emergence and spread of CQ-resistant strains, also reported for P. vivax. Despite CQ resistance, novel drug candidates based on the structure of CQcontinue to be considered, as in the present work. One CQ analog was synthesized asmonoquinoline (MAQ) and compared with a previously synthesized bisquinoline (BAQ), both tested against P. falciparum in vitro and against P. berghei in mice, then evaluated in vitro for their cytotoxicity and ability to inhibit hemozoin formation. Their interactions with residues present in the NADH binding site of P falciparum lactate dehydrogenase were evaluated using docking analysis software. Both compounds were active in the nanomolar range evaluated through the HRPII and hypoxanthine tests. MAQ and BAQ derivatives were not toxic, and both compounds significantly inhibited hemozoin formation, in a dose-dependent manner. MAQ had a higher selectivity index than BAQ and both compounds were weak PfLDH inhibitors, a result previously reported also for CQ. Taken together, the two CQ analogues represent promising molecules which seem to act in a crucial point for the parasite, inhibiting hemozoin formation.
Malaria is one of the most prevalent parasitic diseases in the world. It affects approximately 500 million individuals throughout the tropical and subtropical areas of developing countries and causes considerable morbidity and mortality with about 800,000 deaths worldwide each year [1]. P. falciparum infection in non-immune adults and children is often associated with severe cerebral malaria. The global importance of this disease, current limitations of vector control and the absence of an effective vaccine, makes the development of therapeutic antimalarial drugs the main strategy of malariacontrol [2].CQ is a cost effective antimalarial drug with a relatively good safety profile [3]. However, CQ is no longer used alone due to the emergence and spread of P. falciparumCQ-resistant strains and, more recently, of P. vivax
[4]–[6]. Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is the first line treatment in P. falciparum malaria (WHO, 2009). However, the limited availability of ACT and the decreased susceptibility of P. falciparum to artemisinin derivatives [7]–[8] have required the development of novel antimalarial drugs [9]–[11]. Previous studies have described the discovery of novel antimalarial drugs through analysis of medicinal plants [12] and through novel drug synthesis protocols [13]–[14], however, no new active compound has been shown to be as effective asCQ.Despite the resistance of P. falciparum to CQ, novel drug candidates based on the structure of CQcontinue to be considered [15]–[18]. In the present work, CQ analogs were synthesized asmono- and bisquinoline-based derivatives, referred asMAQ and BAQ, respectively. The main structural aspects considered included the maintenance of the 4-aminoquinoline pharmacophore group and the presence of proton-accepting sites to increase drug bioavailability in the digestive vacuole of the parasite. The compounds were tested: (i) as blood schizonticides against P. falciparum in vitro and against P. bergheimalaria in mice; (ii) for their in vitro cytotoxicity; (iii) for their ability to inhibit hemozoin formation; and (iv) for their binding mode to lactate dehydrogenase and dimerichematin in silico.
Results
Synthesis and characterization of CQ analogs
The structure of the two aminoquinoline derivatives, MAQ and BAQ, and their synthesis strategy are depicted in Scheme S1. Both CQ analogs possess the conserved 4-aminoquinoline moiety (a crucial pharmacophore group), and have a chlorine substituent at the 7 position on the quinoline ring, and, both have amino groups on the alkyl chain [19]. MAQ, a new monoquinoline molecule, and BAQ, a previously synthesized bisquinoline already tested against P. falciparum and proven to be active [20], were prepared from 4,7-dichloroquinoline and diethylenetriamine. These reactions occurred via a SNAr synthesis step, which eliminated the use of solvents [21]. MAQ and BAQ were obtained by controlling the stoichiometric relationship between these reagents. The synthesis protocol for the bisquinolinecompound BAQ was described previously [20].All compounds were active at nanomolar doses in both tests.IC50 = dose that inhibits 50% of blood parasites growth, evaluated in three or four different experiments for each test.BAQ and MAQ were isolated as white solids, which underwent a satisfactory elemental analysis and were fully characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy. On the 1H NMR spectrum, MAQ showed five of the expected signals of the aromatic region (between 8.32 and 6.50 ppm) and four signals related to the methylenic groups (between 3.47 and 2.78 ppm). The hydrogen signals of the amino groups were either not present or had an integration level lower than the predicted value due to the fast H/D exchange with the deuterated solvent. In the 13C NMR spectrum, it was possible to identify nine signals related to the aromaticcarbons (between 152 and 97 ppm) and the four signals associated with the methyleniccarbons (50 to 40 ppm). In the infrared spectrum of MAQ, the typical absorption bands for this kind of chemical structure were observed and the 1H NMR spectrum wasconsistent with the five typical aromatic signals (between 8.25 and 6.46 ppm). However, only two signals related to the methylenic groups were observed due to the symmetry of the molecule (3.45 and 2.95 ppm). In the 13C NMR spectrum of BAQ, the expected nine signals related to the aromaticcarbons (between 152 and 97 ppm) and the two possible signals of the methyleniccarbons (46.8 and 41.8 ppm) were observed. The infrared spectrum of BAQ exhibited the absorption bands predicted for this structure.
BAQ and MAQ activities against P. falciparum in vitro
The 4-aminoquinoline derivatives MAQ and BAQ were compared with CQ for their antiplasmodial activities against the W2 clone of P. falciparum (CQ-resistant and mefloquine-sensitive) and against a CQ-sensitive strain 3D7. All compounds showed activity in the nanomolar range in the HRPII and hypoxanthine tests (Table 1). The IC50 values were similar in both assays, although somewhat lower for BAQ in the hypoxanthine test with W2 parasites. As expected, the IC50 values of BAQ and MAQ were lower with the CQ- sensitive 3D7 strain than with W2 CQ- resistant in most tests.
Table 1
The anti-P. falciparum activities of BAQ and MAQ determined in parallel with chloroquine, by the ELISA anti-HRPII assay or by 3H hypoxanthine incorporation.
Compounds
W2 (CQ resistant)
3D7 (CQ sensitive)
IC50 (nM)
HRPII
Hypoxanthine
HRPII
Hypoxanthine
BAQ
550±0.0
60±20
35±8
105±7
MAQ
260±20
320±70
26±2
66±5
CQ
120±0.0
180±0.0
6.9±0.9
7.4±1.2
All compounds were active at nanomolar doses in both tests.
IC50 = dose that inhibits 50% of blood parasites growth, evaluated in three or four different experiments for each test.
Neither MAQ or BAQ were toxic against hepatoma (HepG2) or kidney (BGM) cell lines, and important, the new CQ analog MAQ was less toxic than BAQ, based on MTTassay (Table 2) or neutral red method (data not shown). Additionally, the CQ analogs were not lytic to human erythrocytes. Even at doses 100 times higher than the IC50 values no hemolysis was detected.
Table 2
Cytotoxicity of BAQ and MAQ against a human hepatoma cell line (HEPG2) and a monkey kidney cell line (BGM) determined by the MTT assay.
Compounds
MDL50 (µM)
Selectivity index*
BGM
HepG2
BGM
HepG2
BAQ
50±30
50±0.0
90
90
MAQ
100±0.0
270±10
384
1038
CQ
370±0.0
490±0.0
3083
4083
Data expressed as the minimal lethal dose for 50% of cells (MDL50), used to calculate the selectivity index against either cell.
Selectivity index = MDL50//IC50.
Data expressed as the minimal lethal dose for 50% of cells (MDL50), used to calculate the selectivity index against either cell.Selectivity index = MDL50//IC50.The selectivity index- IS (the ratio between MDL50 and IC50) was determined and both compounds had an IS greater than 90. The IS was particularly high for MAQ, 384 and 1038, against BGM and HepG2cells respectively (Table 2). Nevertheless, neither compound was better then CQ (IS>3083)
BAQ and MAQ were also active in vivo against rodent malaria
The antimalarial activity of the new CQ analogs was evaluated in mice with P. berghei and is summarized in Table 3. MAQ and BAQ were active in vivo at a dose of 50 mg/kg on days 5, 8 and 10 days post-infection, at 25 mg/kg only MAQ was active. MAQcaused a 95% reduction of parasitemia on day 5. However, only CQcaused 100% suppression of parasitemia and increased the animal survival, but the survival differences were not significant from the other groups.
Table 3
Antimalarial activity of BAQ and MAQ in mice infected with P. berghei after treatment with daily doses of the compounds during three consecutive days.
Compounds
Dose (mg/kg)
Percent reduction of parasitemia*
Time of survival (in days)
5°
8°
10°
BAQ
25
64
26
37
25±2
50
81
75
43
24±1
MAQ
25
91
61
70
24±1
50
95
71
76
25±1
CQ
20
100
100
100
>30
Control
0
0
0
0
19±7
Reductions ≤30% were considered as inactive, 30–50% as partially active and ≥50% as active drugs.
Reductions ≤30% were considered as inactive, 30–50% as partially active and ≥50% as active drugs.
The antimalarial activity of BAQ and MAQ involves inhibition of hemozoin formation
Whether anti P. falciparum activity of BAQ and MAQ involves inhibition of hemozoin formation was evaluated using an indirect in vitro test. Both compounds significantly inhibited hemozoin formation in vitro (Figure 1) in a dose-dependent reaction. The inhibition was more evident with MAQ than with BAQ or CQ (Figure 1A).
Figure 1
Inhibition of hemozoin formation by the CQ analogs BAQ and MAQ (mean ± SD from triplicates), in two different experiments.
Statistical differences as compared to drug-free controls are indicated in each graph by an asterisk (p<0.05). The p and r values represent the statistical correlation analyses.
Inhibition of hemozoin formation by the CQ analogs BAQ and MAQ (mean ± SD from triplicates), in two different experiments.
Statistical differences ascompared to drug-free controls are indicated in each graph by an asterisk (p<0.05). The p and r values represent the statistical correlation analyses.Similarly, docking studies with MAQ and BAQ showed that the MolDock Score energies between the antimalarials and the dimerichematin (Table 4) were approximately –100.000 kcal mol–1. Both aminoquinoline derivatives, similar to CQ, were able to interact with dimerichematin to form a complex. The best conformations (Figure 2) obtained for the complexes showed that the aromatic rings of both compounds were parallel to the hematin ferriprotoporphyrin group (Figure 3). Weak hydrogen bonds (approximately −5.0 kcal mol–1) corroborate previous studies demonstrating that the hydrophobic interactions were the main contributors for the binding between CQ and the dimer [22]–[23].
Table 4
Docking energies of the protonated forms of the CQ analogs BAQ and MAQ.
Structure
H Bond Energy (kcal mol−1)
MolDock Score (kcal mol−1)
Protonated CQ
−3.43
−105.97
MAQ-1
−1.95
−100.57
MAQ-2
−5.00
−92.16
MAQ-3
−3.50
−76.50
BAQ-1
−2.50
−119.69
BAQ-2
−2.50
−116.89
Figure 2
Chemical structures of the protonated forms of the CQ analogs BAQ and MAQ.
The antimalarial action of BAQ and MAQ involves binding to lactate dehydrogenase
Table 5 presents the H-bond energy and MolDock Scores of the residues involved in H-bonds with NADHas well as the protonated forms of chloroquine, BAQ and MAQ docked to PfLDH. Figure 4 shows that these compounds presented the most stable energy conformations in the binding site of NADH. This suggests that they are NADHcompetitors. The H-bond energy between the protonated chloroquine and the enzyme was −3.8 kcal mol−1, a high value compared with that of NADH H-bond energy (−35.3 kcal mol−1). The energy of interaction between the enzyme and the protonated forms of MAQ were approximately −250.00 kcal mol−1. Furthermore, MAQ like the protonated chloroquine, bound to the active site of PfLDH; BAQ-1 and BAQ-2 presented the lowest energies, which were extremely large when compared to NADH. These findings suggest that all these compounds are weak inhibitors of PfLDH, as previously reported for chloroquine [24].
Table 5
Docking results of NADH and the protonated forms of chloroquine, BAQ and MAQ in the active site of PfLDH.
Best conformations of the protonated forms of chloroquine, MAQ and BAQ (in green) in the binding pocket of NADH (in CPK) as generated by the MVD® software.
Best conformations of the protonated forms of chloroquine, MAQ and BAQ (in green) in the binding pocket of NADH (in CPK) as generated by the MVD® software.
A large series of bisquinoline derivatives containing proton-accepting amino groups on the aliphaticchain moiety has already been described [19] and considered a promising class of compounds for treating drug-resistant malaria parasites. Two CQ analogs MAQ and BAQ were obtained as low-cost antimalarial prototypes, which is important considering that disease transmission is concentrated in developing countries and is most frequent among the impoverished classes of several endemiccountries [9]. Comparisons between their antimalarial activities aimed to evaluate the molecular structural-activity relationship between mono- and bisquinolinecompounds.We showed that MAQ and BAQare active in vitro against CQ-resistant and CQ-sensitive P. falciparum parasites at nanomolar doses in the hypoxanthine incorporation test and in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), using antibodies against the histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP-II), a parasite protein.Our results show that MAQ, a new monoquinoline, has a higher IS, in consonance with the tendency of a decreased toxicity when comparing mono- to bisquinoline analogs. Such in vitro activity wasconfirmed in vivo in mice infected with P. berghei; MAQ was more effective as proven by parasitemia reduction in response to drug treatment.Further in vitro analysis showed that the compounds interacted with dimerichematin and inhibited heme polymerization. Although the mechanism of action of CQ is not well understood, several experimental studies describe the interaction between CQ and the dimeric form of heme [25], [26], [27], [28]. This interaction seems responsible for the inhibition of hemozoin formation, a hypothesis further supported by docking studies, which also suggest that all protonated forms of MAQ and BAQ interact with the rings parallel to the heme group, as described previously for CQ [26], [27], [28], [29].The presence of two quinoline moieties in BAQ increases the probability of hydrophobic interactions when compared with MAQ and also results in lower docking energies for all protonation states of the amino groups. The results of this study suggest that the protonated BAQ at the central nitrogen (BAQ-1) should be more effective at inhibiting heme polymerization.Experimental and modeling studies have shown that chloroquine binds to PfLDH, suggesting that CQ possesses another mechanism of drug action or a mechanism complementary to the one already proposed [24], [29]. Although PfLDH is not a direct chloroquine target, experimental data have shown its weak binding to chloroquine [30]. The existence of this shared target-binding site suggests that PfLDH is related to drug effectiveness. The docking data (Figure 4) suggest that the protonated forms of BAQ and MAQ present the most stable energeticconformations at the binding site of NADH inside PfLDH. The H-bond energy and MolDock Scores, the residues involved in the H-bonds with NADH and the protonated forms of chloroquineas well asBAQ and MAQ binding to PfLDH (Table 5) suggest that these compounds are NADHcompetitors. The H-bond energy between protonated chloroquine and the enzyme is −3.8 kcal mol−1, a high value compared with the H-bond energy of NADH (−35.3 kcal mol−1). The energies of interaction between the enzyme and the protonated forms of MAQ were approximately –250.0 kcal mol−1. Furthermore, MAQ compounds showed a similar behavior at the active site of PfLDH compared with protonated chloroquine. BAQ-1 and BAQ-2 possessed the lowest energies, which were extremely large compared with NADH. Overall, these findings suggest that all of these compounds are weak inhibitors of PfLDH, as previously reported for chloroquine [22]–[23].One of the recent strategies to develop effective antimalarial agents is based on the development of metal-drugs [31], [32], [33]. Thus, MAQ and BAQ were associated with metals readily available to be tested for their antimalarial activity, in promising ongoing tests (data not shown). Metallocomplexed drugs, considered first-line anticancer drugs [34], [35], are increasingly used to develop anti-parasitic agents [36], [37], [38].
Materials and Methods
Reagents and drug synthesis
All reactions for drug synthesis were performed under a 100% argon atmosphere using a dual vacuum/argon line and standard Schlenk techniques. Reagents and solvents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. The IR spectra were recorded on a Varian 640-IR with an ATR device and the elementary analyses were conducted at the analytical center, University of São Paulo. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded at 400.130 MHz and the 13C NMR spectra at 100.613 MHz on a Bruker instrument (Bruker Avance 400) and were externally referenced to the tetramethylsilane (TMS). Chemical shifts (δ) and coupling constants (J) were expressed in ppm and Hz, respectively. The melting or decomposition points of the structures were determined on a MQAPF 302 apparatus.
Synthesis of the 4-aminoquinolines, MAQ and BAQ
MAQ, N, was prepared according to the synthesis procedures described by Musonda and collaborators [39]. Briefly, a mixture of 4,7-dichloroquinoline (0.98 g, 4.9 mmol) and diethylenetriamine (2.7 mL, 25 mmol) was heated at 80°C for 1 h without stirring, following by heating at 135°C for 3 h with stirring. The mixture wascooled to room temperature, alkalized with an aqueous solution of 10% NaOH (30 mL), extracted with hot EtOAc (3×50 mL) and dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under vacuum and the residue wascrystallized with CH2Cl2/hexane, thereby leading to a white solid. Chemical and spectral analyses revealed the following: Yield: 0.52 g, 40%. M.F: C13H17ClN4; M.M.: 264.75 g/mol. Elem. Anal., theoretical: C13H17ClN4, C, 58.98; H, 6.47; N, 21.16, experimental: C13H17ClN4.H2O, C, 55.23; H, 6.54; N, 19.22. M.P.: 99–100°C; I.R. (νmáx cm−1): 3256 (Ar- NH); 3065 (CH quinoline ring); 2929 and 2839 (CHas/s and CH2); 1607, 1577 and 1528 (C = Cquinoline ring); 1449 (CH2); 1280 (Ar-C-N); 1133 (C-N); 874, 795 and 761 (δ = C-H out-of-plane aromatic ring). RMN1H (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 1.93 (s, NH amine), 2.78 (t, J = 5.76 Hz, 2H, CH2-16), 2.85 (t, J = 5.76 Hz, 2H, CH2-15), 2.95 (t, J = 6.38 Hz, 2H, CH2-13), 3.47 (t, J = 6.38 Hz, 2H, CH2-12), 3.70 (ls, NH aniline), 6.50 (d, J = 5.71 Hz, 1H, Ar-H C-3), 7.35 (dd, J = 9.01 Hz, J = 2.14 Hz, 1H, Ar-H C-6), 7.73 (d, J = 2.14 Hz, 1H, Ar-H C-8), 8.07 (d, J = 9.01 Hz, 1H, Ar-H C-5), 8.32 (d, J = 5.62 Hz, 1H, Ar-H C-2). RMN13C (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ 151.1 (C-2), 98.28 (C-3), 151.4 (C-4), 124.6 (C-5), 123.08 (C-6), 134.9 (C-7), 126.2 (C-8), 148.2 (C-9), 117.32 (C-10), 50.03 (C-12), 42.08 (C-13), 39.9 (C-15), 38.46 (C-16).BAQ, N, was synthesized according to the synthesis procedures described by Zhang and collaborators [40]. Briefly, a mixture of 4,7-dichloroquinoline (1.20 g, 6.00 mmol) and diethylenetriamine (0.22 mL, 2.00 mmol) was heated at 80°C for 6 h without stirring and then at 130°C for 3 h with stirring. The reaction mixture wascooled to room temperature and the resulting solid that formed was washed with an aqueous solution of 10% NaOH (30 mL) and recrystallized with MeOH/water. The solid was recuperated by filtration and dried under vacuum, which lead to a white solid. Chemical and spectral analyses revealed the following: Yield: 0.43 g, 50%. M.F: C22H21Cl2N5; M.M.: 426.34 g/mol. Elem. Anal., theoretical: C22H21Cl2N5, C, 61.98; H, 4.96; N, 16.43; experimental: C22H21Cl2N5.4H2O, C, 53.03; H, 4.91; N, 14.07. M.P.: 212–215°C; IR. (νmax in cm−1): 3272 (Ar- NH); 3071 (CH quinoline ring); 2901 and 2843 (CH2 as/s); 1608, 1576 and 1531 (C = Cquinoline ring); 1441 (CH2); 1328 (Ar-CN); 1136 (C-N); 865 and 798 (δ out-of-plane aromatic ring). 1HRMN (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 2.97 (t, J = 6.22 Hz, 2H, CH2-13), 3.45 (t, J = 6.24 Hz, 2H, CH2-12), 6.45 (d, J = 5.69 Hz, 1H, Ar-H C-3), 7.20 (dd, J = 9.01 Hz, J = 2.14 Hz, 1H, Ar-H C-6), 7.67 (d, J = 2.12 Hz, 1H, Ar-H C-8), 7.87 (d, J = 8.97 Hz, Ar-H C-5), 8.24 (d, J = 5.61 Hz, 1H, Ar-H C-2). RMN13C (100 MHz, MeOD): δ 150.9 (C-2), 98.3 (C-3), 151.2 (C-4), 124.6 (C-5), 122.6 (C-6), 134.9 (C-7), 126.2 (C-8), 148.14 (C-9), 117.3 (C-10), 46.8 (C-12), 41.8 (C-13).
Continuous cultures of P. falciparum
P. falciparum blood parasites (W2 clone, CQ-resistant and mefloquine-sensitive) were maintained in continuous culture as previously described [41] with slight modifications [42]. The 3D7 strain, CQ- sensitive, originally received from the New York University Medical School, was also used. Briefly, the parasites were kept at 37°C in human erythrocytes (A+) with complete medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% human serum blood group A+, 2% glutamine and 7.5% NaHCO3) in Petri dishes in a candle jar or in a 25-cm culture flask in a defined atmosphere (with 3% O2, 5% CO2 and 91% N2). Human erythrocytes (A+) and serum blood group A+ were kindly donated by Center of Hemotherapy and Hemathology of Minas Gerais (HEMOMINAS). Immediately before the tests, ring stage-parasites were synchronized in sorbitol [43]. Synchronized parasites were stained with orange green in pre-dried coverslips [44] then immediately examined under a fluorescent microscope. The suspension was adjusted for parasitemia and hematocritas described below for each test. The infected red blood cells were distributed in a 96-well microtiter plate (Corning, Santa Clara, CA, EUA) at 180 µL/well, in which 20 µL of the test drugs and controls were previously diluted at different concentrations (400-0.625 ng/mL) in 0.005% DMSO (v/v) (Sigma, USA).
In vitro assays with P. falciparum infected erythrocytes
The effects of BAQ and MAQ on the W2 and 3D7P. falciparum blood cultures were assayed through the incorporation of 3Hhypoxanthine (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, EUA) [45] and with monoclonal antibodies to the parasite histidine and alanine-rich protein (HRPII) (MPFM ICLLAB-55A®, MPFG55P ICLLAB®, USA) (Noedl 2002). The [3H]-hypoxanthineassay was performed at 1% parasitemia and 1% hematocrit and the level of isotope incorporation was read in a beta-counter (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, EUA). The anti-HRPII test was performed at 0.05% parasitemia and 1.5% hematocrit and the HRPII quantification was read at 450 nm in a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax340PC384, Molecular Devices). The results of three of these drug activity assays were expressed as the mean of the half-maximal inhibitory dose (IC50) and compared with the drug-free controls. Curve-fitting was performed using Origin 8.0 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) [46].
Inhibition of hemozoin assay
The hemozoin inhibition assay was performed as described by Ncokazi et al., (2002) [47] with some modifications. Briefly, 10.1 µL of the aminoquinoline derivatives at different concentrations (40-0.62 mg/mL) and 101.2 µL of the hematin stock solution (1.68 mM in 0.1 M NaOH) were combined in triplicate in a flat-bottomed 96-well plate. The solutions were further mixed and 58.7 µL of acetate solution (12.9 M, pH 5.0) then added to each well. After incubation at 60°C, 80 µL of 30% (v/v) pyridine solution in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, were added at room temperature. The solids formed were resuspended and allowed to settle for 15 min at room temperature. Then, 38 µL of the supernatant were transferred to a new plate and diluted to 250 µL with a 30% (v/v) pyridine solution (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5). The color reaction was read in a spectophometer at 405 nm and the results were expressed as the concentration of free heme in each well, which wascalculated from the standard absorbance curve of a known hemin solution. CQ was used as a positive control and the cut off was determined by the amount of free heme in the drug-free control. Each compound was evaluated in two different experiments.
Antimalarial tests against P. berghei in mice
A suppressive parasite growth test was used with P. berghei, NK65 strain (originally received from the New York University Medical School) infected miceas described previously [48] with some modifications [49]. Briefly, adult Swiss outbred mice (20±2 g weigh) were inoculated with 1×105 red blood cells infected with P. berghei, by intraperitoneal route. The infected mice were maintained together for at least 2 h and then divided randomly into groups of 3–5 animals per cage, which were subsequently treated with 25 and 50 mg/kg of each compound diluted in DMSO 3% (v/v) given daily by oral gavage for three consecutive days. Two control groups were used in parallel, one treated with CQ (20 mg/kg) and one with the vehicle. Blood smears from mouse tails were prepared on days 5, 8 and 10 post-infection and then methanol-fixed, stained with Giemsa and examined microscopically. The parasitemia was evaluated and the percent inhibition of parasite growth calculated in relation to the untreated control group (considered 100% growth) using the following equation: [(C - T)/C] ×100; where C is the parasitemia in the control group and T is the parasitemia in the treated group.The use of laboratory animals was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Use of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation - Fiocruz (CEUA L-0046/08).
Cell cultures and cytotoxicity tests
The humanhepatomacell line (HepG2) was originally received from the New University of Lisbon, and the monkey kidney cell line (BGM) from the Federal University of Minas Gerais. These cells were cultured in 75 cm2 plates with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum and 40 mg/L gentamicine in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. For the in vitro tests, a confluent cell monolayer was trypsinized, washed with culture medium, distributed in a flat-bottomed 96-well plate (5×103 cells/well) and incubated for 18 h at 37°C to ensure cell adherence.The cytotoxicity was evaluated with the MTTassay, 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide [50]. Briefly, the HepG2 and BGM cell lines were incubated with 20 µL of the compounds at different concentrations (1000-1 µg/mL) for 24 h in a 5% CO2 and air atmosphere at 37°C. For the MTTassay, which evaluates mitochondrial viability, 20 µL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) were added and the plates were incubated for a further 3 h. After incubation, the supernatant wascarefully removed from the wells, followed by the addition of 100 µL DMSO with thorough mixing. The optical density at 570 and 630 nm (background) was determined on an ELISA reader (SpectraMax340PC384, Molecular Devices).The neutral redassay was used to evaluate cell viability by the accumulation of dye in the viable cell lysosome [51]. Briefly, the cells were incubated for 2 h with 100 µL of a neutral red solution (100 µg/mL). Then, the supernatants were discard and 200 µL of a formaldehyde (0.5% v/v) and CaCl2 (1%) solution were added, which was followed by another 5 min incubation. Finally, the supernatant was removed, then 100 µL of an alcohol-acid solution added to the sediment. The absorbance was read at 540 nm on an ELISA reader (SpectraMax340PC384, Molecular Devices). Cell viability was expressed as the percentage of control absorbance obtained in untreated cells after subtracting the absorbance of the appropriate background. Lastly, the minimum lethal dose for 50% of the cells (MLD50) was determined as previously described [52].
Hemolysis assay
The test and control compounds were diluted in a 0.2% (v/v) DMSO solution and incubated (0–50 µg/mL) with a human erythrocytes suspension (1% hematocrit) at 37°C for 30 min in a shaking water bath. The mixtures were centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 min and the absorbance of the supernatants was measured at 540 nm in an ELISA reader (SpectraMax340PC384, Molecular Devices). The hemolytic rate wascalculated in relation to the hemolysis of erythrocytes in 0.05% saponin, which wasconsidered to be 100% [53].
Docking energy calculations
The 3D optimized structure of dimerichematin was taken from our previous studies [29]. The structures of CQ and its analogs were built using the Gaussian View software and optimized using Gaussian 03 [54]. The structural analysis of CQ analogs (BAQ and MAQ) was performed and all possible protonation forms in the biological medium were considered (Figure 2). The geometry optimizations and partial atomiccharge distributions were performed using the B3LYP/3-21G level of theory. The calculations for the docking energies were performed with Molegro Virtual Docker (MVD) software [55] as described previously [25]. The algorithm used in the docking studies was the MolDock Score, which is an adaptation of the Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm [53]. The MolDock Score was used because it yields a higher docking accuracy than other state-of-the-art docking algorithms (MVD: 87%, Glide: 82%, Surflex: 75%, FlexX: 58%) [46].The 3D structure of PfLDH complexed with NADH and the substrate oxamate used in the present work was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) file 1LDG [56], [57]. We performed flexible docking studies (considering the presence of water molecules in the crystal) with the protonated forms of BAQ and MAQ to compare these interactions with protonated chloroquine at the active site of PfLDH.Synthesis of MAQ and BAQ.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Chiara Gabbiani; Luigi Messori; Maria A Cinellu; Angela Casini; Pasquale Mura; Anna R Sannella; Carlo Severini; Giancarlo Majori; Anna R Bilia; Franco F Vincieri Journal: J Inorg Biochem Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 4.155
Authors: Wilian A Cortopassi; Aline A Oliveira; Ana P Guimarães; Magdalena N Rennó; Antoniana U Krettli; Tanos C C França Journal: J Biomol Struct Dyn Date: 2011-08
Authors: Adina Ryckebusch; Marie-Ange Debreu-Fontaine; Elisabeth Mouray; Philippe Grellier; Christian Sergheraert; Patricia Melnyk Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2005-01-17 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Douglas R Rice; María de Lourdes Betancourt Mendiola; Claribel Murillo-Solano; Lisa A Checkley; Michael T Ferdig; Juan C Pizarro; Bradley D Smith Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Luiz Francisco Rocha e Silva; Karla Lagos Nogueira; Ana Cristina da Silva Pinto; Alejandro Miguel Katzin; Rodrigo A C Sussmann; Magno Perêa Muniz; Valter Ferreira de Andrade Neto; Francisco Célio Maia Chaves; Julia Penna Coutinho; Emerson Silva Lima; Antoniana Ursine Krettli; Wanderli Pedro Tadei; Adrian Martin Pohlit Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Mariana Conceição Souza; Tatiana Almeida Padua; Natalia Domingos Torres; Maria Fernanda de Souza Costa; Victor Facchinetti; Claudia Regina Brandão Gomes; Marcus Vinícius Nora Souza; Maria das Graças Henriques Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 2.743
Authors: Julia Penna Coutinho; Anna Caroline Campos Aguiar; Pierre Alexandre dos Santos; Joaquim Corsino Lima; Maria Gabrielle Lima Rocha; Carlos Leomar Zani; Tânia Maria Almeida Alves; Antônio Euzébio Goulart Santana; Maria de Meneses Pereira; Antoniana Ursine Krettli Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.743
Authors: Fernanda G Versiani; Maria E M Almeida; Gisely C Melo; Francivaldo O L Versiani; Patrícia P Orlandi; Luís André M Mariúba; Leidiane A Soares; Luciana P Souza; Antonio A da Silva Balieiro; Wuelton M Monteiro; Fabio T M Costa; Hernando A del Portillo; Marcus V G Lacerda; Paulo A Nogueira Journal: Malar J Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 2.979