Literature DB >> 22649152

Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL--CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657.

Laura J Esserman1, Donald A Berry, Angela DeMichele, Lisa Carey, Sarah E Davis, Meredith Buxton, Cliff Hudis, Joe W Gray, Charles Perou, Christina Yau, Chad Livasy, Helen Krontiras, Leslie Montgomery, Debasish Tripathy, Constance Lehman, Minetta C Liu, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Hope S Rugo, John T Carpenter, Lynn Dressler, David Chhieng, Baljit Singh, Carolyn Mies, Joseph Rabban, Yunn-Yi Chen, Dilip Giri, Laura van 't Veer, Nola Hylton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer provides critical information about tumor response; how best to leverage this for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) is not established. The I-SPY 1 TRIAL (Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response With Imaging and Molecular Analysis) was a multicenter breast cancer study integrating clinical, imaging, and genomic data to evaluate pathologic response, RFS, and their relationship and predictability based on tumor biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had tumors ≥ 3 cm and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We determined associations between pathologic complete response (pCR; defined as the absence of invasive cancer in breast and nodes) and RFS, overall and within receptor subsets.
RESULTS: In 221 evaluable patients (median tumor size, 6.0 cm; median age, 49 years; 91% classified as poor risk on the basis of the 70-gene prognosis profile), 41% were hormone receptor (HR) negative, and 31% were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive. For 190 patients treated without neoadjuvant trastuzumab, pCR was highest for HR-negative/HER2-positive patients (45%) and lowest for HR-positive/HER2-negative patients (9%). Achieving pCR predicted favorable RFS. For 172 patients treated without trastuzumab, the hazard ratio for RFS of pCR versus no pCR was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.82). pCR was more predictive of RFS by multivariate analysis when subtype was taken into account, and point estimates of hazard ratios within the HR-positive/HER2-negative (hazard ratio, 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.93), HR-negative/HER2-negative (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.97), and HER2-positive (hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.01 to 1.0) subtypes are lower. Ki67 further improved the prediction of pCR within subsets.
CONCLUSION: In this biologically high-risk group, pCR differs by receptor subset. pCR is more highly predictive of RFS within every established receptor subset than overall, demonstrating that the extent of outcome advantage conferred by pCR is specific to tumor biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22649152      PMCID: PMC3434983          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.2779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  31 in total

1.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL.

Authors:  Nola M Hylton; Jeffrey D Blume; Wanda K Bernreuter; Etta D Pisano; Mark A Rosen; Elizabeth A Morris; Paul T Weatherall; Constance D Lehman; Gillian M Newstead; Sandra Polin; Helga S Marques; Laura J Esserman; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Correlation between MIB-1 and other proliferation markers: clinical implications of the MIB-1 cutoff value.

Authors:  Frédérique Spyratos; Magali Ferrero-Poüs; Martine Trassard; Kamel Hacène; Edelmira Phillips; Michèle Tubiana-Hulin; Viviane Le Doussal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Predictors of tumor progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Kelly K Hunt; Ping Liu; Lajos Pusztai; W Fraser Symmans; Henry M Kuerer; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; E Claire Dees; Lynda Sawyer; Lisa Gatti; Dominic T Moore; Frances Collichio; David W Ollila; Carolyn I Sartor; Mark L Graham; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Constance Cirrincione; I Craig Henderson; Marc L Citron; Daniel R Budman; Lori J Goldstein; Silvana Martino; Edith A Perez; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27.

Authors:  Harry D Bear; Stewart Anderson; Roy E Smith; Charles E Geyer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Bernard Fisher; Ann M Brown; Andre Robidoux; Richard Margolese; Morton S Kahlenberg; Soonmyung Paik; Atilla Soran; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Marion Procter; Brian Leyland-Jones; Aron Goldhirsch; Michael Untch; Ian Smith; Luca Gianni; Jose Baselga; Richard Bell; Christian Jackisch; David Cameron; Mitch Dowsett; Carlos H Barrios; Günther Steger; Chiun-Shen Huang; Michael Andersson; Moshe Inbar; Mikhail Lichinitser; István Láng; Ulrike Nitz; Hiroji Iwata; Christoph Thomssen; Caroline Lohrisch; Thomas M Suter; Josef Rüschoff; Tamás Suto; Victoria Greatorex; Carol Ward; Carolyn Straehle; Eleanor McFadden; M Stella Dolci; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Edward H Romond; Edith A Perez; John Bryant; Vera J Suman; Charles E Geyer; Nancy E Davidson; Elizabeth Tan-Chiu; Silvana Martino; Soonmyung Paik; Peter A Kaufman; Sandra M Swain; Thomas M Pisansky; Louis Fehrenbacher; Leila A Kutteh; Victor G Vogel; Daniel W Visscher; Greg Yothers; Robert B Jenkins; Ann M Brown; Shaker R Dakhil; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Wilma L Lingle; Pamela M Klein; James N Ingle; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Hormone receptor status and pathologic response of HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab.

Authors:  F Peintinger; A U Buzdar; H M Kuerer; J A Mejia; C Hatzis; A M Gonzalez-Angulo; L Pusztai; F J Esteva; S S Dawood; M C Green; G N Hortobagyi; W F Symmans
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  160 in total

1.  Usefulness of positron emission mammography in the evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Irma Soldevilla-Gallardo; Sevastian S Medina-Ornelas; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Enrique Bargalló-Rocha; Claudia Hs Caro-Sánchez; Rodrigo Hernández-Ramírez; Enrique Estrada-Lobato
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-20

Review 2.  Neoadjuvant paradigm for accelerated drug development: an ideal model in bladder cancer.

Authors:  David D Chism; Michael E Woods; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-07-24

3.  Longitudinal optical monitoring of blood flow in breast tumors during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  J M Cochran; S H Chung; A Leproux; W B Baker; D R Busch; A M DeMichele; J Tchou; B J Tromberg; A G Yodh
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Analysis of the correlation between endorectal MRI response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  M D Galsky; W Xie; M Nakabayashi; R W Ross; F M Fennessy; C M Tempany; T K Choueiri; K Khine; P W Kantoff; M-E Taplin; W K Oh
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  Identification of distinct basal and luminal subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with different sensitivities to frontline chemotherapy.

Authors:  Woonyoung Choi; Sima Porten; Seungchan Kim; Daniel Willis; Elizabeth R Plimack; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Beat Roth; Tiewei Cheng; Mai Tran; I-Ling Lee; Jonathan Melquist; Jolanta Bondaruk; Tadeusz Majewski; Shizhen Zhang; Shanna Pretzsch; Keith Baggerly; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Bogdan Czerniak; Colin P N Dinney; David J McConkey
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  Standard Pathologic Features Can Be Used to Identify a Subset of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2 Negative Patients Likely to Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Oriana A Petruolo; Melissa Pilewskie; Sujata Patil; Andrea V Barrio; Michelle Stempel; Hannah Y Wen; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Genomic profiling in luminal breast cancer.

Authors:  Oleg Gluz; Daniel Hofmann; Rachel Würstlein; Cornelia Liedtke; Ulrike Nitz; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  Breast cancer: Actual methods of treatment and future trends.

Authors:  Paweł Murawa; Dawid Murawa; Beata Adamczyk; Karol Połom
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-01-23

9.  Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Ian M Thompson; Brian Reid; Peter Nelson; David F Ransohoff; H Gilbert Welch; Shelley Hwang; Donald A Berry; Kenneth W Kinzler; William C Black; Mina Bissell; Howard Parnes; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Inference of tumor evolution during chemotherapy by computational modeling and in situ analysis of genetic and phenotypic cellular diversity.

Authors:  Vanessa Almendro; Yu-Kang Cheng; Amanda Randles; Shalev Itzkovitz; Andriy Marusyk; Elisabet Ametller; Xavier Gonzalez-Farre; Montse Muñoz; Hege G Russnes; Aslaug Helland; Inga H Rye; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Reo Maruyama; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Mitchell Dowsett; Robin L Jones; Jorge Reis-Filho; Pere Gascon; Mithat Gönen; Franziska Michor; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.