Literature DB >> 30510851

Usefulness of positron emission mammography in the evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Irma Soldevilla-Gallardo1, Sevastian S Medina-Ornelas1, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza2, Enrique Bargalló-Rocha3, Claudia Hs Caro-Sánchez4, Rodrigo Hernández-Ramírez1, Enrique Estrada-Lobato5.   

Abstract

Our study examines the association between two Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) semi-quantitative parameters: PUVmax (maximum uptake value) and LTB (lesion to background) baseline and the end of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with pathologic response in each of the following breast cancer subtype: Triple negative breast cancer (TPN), HER2-positive, and ER-positive/HER2-negative cancers. One-hundred and eight patients, 71 with invasive ductal carcinoma and 37 with infiltrating lobular carcinoma were evaluate with 18F-FDG-PEM scans before and after of NAC. We assessed the impact of 2 PEM semi-quantitative parameters for molecular subtype correlated with pathologic response according Miller-Payne grade (MPG). After NAC, an overall reduction of 2 PEM semi-quantitative parameters was found. Neither breast cancer subtypes nor Ki67 modified chemotherapy responses. Compared to PUVmax, an overall increase of LTB was found in baseline condition, independent of the expressed immunophenotype. Post-treatment values of PUVmax revealed a significant reduction compared to baseline values (4.8 ± 0.26 vs. 1.9 ± 0.18; P < 0.001) and LTB exhibited a significant decay after the first course of NAC (15.8 ± 1.36 vs. 5.5 ± 0.49; P < 0.001). Using the Kruskal-Wallis H test which showed no correlation between the different molecular subtypes and the MPG and PUVmax and LTB (P = 0.52). Two PEM semi-quantitative parameters demonstrated a statically significant correlation and equivalence across the different breast cancer subtypes correlated with pathologic response according to MPG. PEM did not allow for prediction of NAC response in terms of breast cancer biomarkers, it is not discarded that this technology might be helpful for individual treatment stratification in breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG-PEM; Positron emission mammography; breast cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30510851      PMCID: PMC6261879     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging


  32 in total

1.  Molecular imaging in cancer.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Equivalence tests for comparing correlation and regression coefficients.

Authors:  Alyssa Counsell; Robert A Cribbie
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 3.  Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development.

Authors:  Gary J Kelloff; John M Hoffman; Bruce Johnson; Howard I Scher; Barry A Siegel; Edward Y Cheng; Bruce D Cheson; Joyce O'shaughnessy; Kathryn Z Guyton; David A Mankoff; Lalitha Shankar; Steven M Larson; Caroline C Sigman; Richard L Schilsky; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Biological subtypes of breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Ozlem Yersal; Sabri Barutca
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort.

Authors:  Luca Gianni; Wolfgang Eiermann; Vladimir Semiglazov; Alexey Manikhas; Ana Lluch; Sergey Tjulandin; Milvia Zambetti; Federico Vazquez; Mikhail Byakhow; Mikhail Lichinitser; Miguel Angel Climent; Eva Ciruelos; Belén Ojeda; Mauro Mansutti; Alla Bozhok; Roberta Baronio; Andrea Feyereislova; Claire Barton; Pinuccia Valagussa; Jose Baselga
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Changes in 18F-FDG tumor metabolism after a first course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: influence of tumor subtypes.

Authors:  O Humbert; A Berriolo-Riedinger; J M Riedinger; B Coudert; L Arnould; A Cochet; C Loustalot; P Fumoleau; F Brunotte
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Body size and risk of luminal, HER2-overexpressing, and triple-negative breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Kathleen E Malone; Peggy L Porter; Janet R Daling; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Ki67 measured after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Wolfgang D Schmitt; Sibylle Loibl; Berit M Müller; Jens U Blohmer; Bruno V Sinn; Holger Eidtmann; Wolfgang Eiermann; Bernd Gerber; Hans Tesch; Jörn Hilfrich; Jens Huober; Tanja Fehm; Jana Barinoff; Thomas Rüdiger; Erhard Erbstoesser; Peter A Fasching; Thomas Karn; Volkmar Müller; Christian Jackisch; Carsten Denkert
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Ki-67 as a controversial predictive and prognostic marker in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Balázs Ács; Veronika Zámbó; Laura Vízkeleti; A Marcell Szász; Lilla Madaras; Gyöngyvér Szentmártoni; Tímea Tőkés; Béla Á Molnár; István Artúr Molnár; Stefan Vári-Kakas; Janina Kulka; Anna-Mária Tőkés
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Ki-67 is a prognostic parameter in breast cancer patients: results of a large population-based cohort of a cancer registry.

Authors:  E C Inwald; M Klinkhammer-Schalke; F Hofstädter; F Zeman; M Koller; M Gerstenhauer; O Ortmann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pre-treatment systemic immune-inflammation index is a useful prognostic indicator in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Li Chen; Xiangyi Kong; Zhongzhao Wang; Xiangyu Wang; Yi Fang; Jing Wang
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.310

2.  ImmunoPET of CD146 in Orthotopic and Metastatic Breast Cancer Models.

Authors:  Cuicui Li; Lei Kang; Kevin Fan; Carolina A Ferreira; Kaelyn V Becker; Nan Huo; Hanxiao Liu; Yunan Yang; Jonathan W Engle; Rongfu Wang; Xiaojie Xu; Dawei Jiang; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 6.069

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.