Literature DB >> 22647928

Twelve automated thresholding methods for segmentation of PET images: a phantom study.

Elena Prieto1, Pablo Lecumberri, Miguel Pagola, Marisol Gómez, Izaskun Bilbao, Margarita Ecay, Iván Peñuelas, Josep M Martí-Climent.   

Abstract

Tumor volume delineation over positron emission tomography (PET) images is of great interest for proper diagnosis and therapy planning. However, standard segmentation techniques (manual or semi-automated) are operator dependent and time consuming while fully automated procedures are cumbersome or require complex mathematical development. The aim of this study was to segment PET images in a fully automated way by implementing a set of 12 automated thresholding algorithms, classical in the fields of optical character recognition, tissue engineering or non-destructive testing images in high-tech structures. Automated thresholding algorithms select a specific threshold for each image without any a priori spatial information of the segmented object or any special calibration of the tomograph, as opposed to usual thresholding methods for PET. Spherical (18)F-filled objects of different volumes were acquired on clinical PET/CT and on a small animal PET scanner, with three different signal-to-background ratios. Images were segmented with 12 automatic thresholding algorithms and results were compared with the standard segmentation reference, a threshold at 42% of the maximum uptake. Ridler and Ramesh thresholding algorithms based on clustering and histogram-shape information, respectively, provided better results that the classical 42%-based threshold (p < 0.05). We have herein demonstrated that fully automated thresholding algorithms can provide better results than classical PET segmentation tools.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22647928     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/12/3963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Joint segmentation of anatomical and functional images: applications in quantification of lesions from PET, PET-CT, MRI-PET, and MRI-PET-CT images.

Authors:  Ulas Bagci; Jayaram K Udupa; Neil Mendhiratta; Brent Foster; Ziyue Xu; Jianhua Yao; Xinjian Chen; Daniel J Mollura
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Accurate segmenting of cervical tumors in PET imaging based on similarity between adjacent slices.

Authors:  Liyuan Chen; Chenyang Shen; Zhiguo Zhou; Genevieve Maquilan; Kimberly Thomas; Michael R Folkert; Kevin Albuquerque; Jing Wang
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Adaptive region-growing with maximum curvature strategy for tumor segmentation in 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Shan Tan; Laquan Li; Wookjin Choi; Min Kyu Kang; Warren D D'Souza; Wei Lu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Simultaneous Tumor Segmentation, Image Restoration, and Blur Kernel Estimation in PET Using Multiple Regularizations.

Authors:  Laquan Li; Jian Wang; Wei Lu; Shan Tan
Journal:  Comput Vis Image Underst       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Impact of consensus contours from multiple PET segmentation methods on the accuracy of functional volume delineation.

Authors:  A Schaefer; M Vermandel; C Baillet; A S Dewalle-Vignion; R Modzelewski; P Vera; L Massoptier; C Parcq; D Gibon; T Fechter; U Nemer; I Gardin; U Nestle
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  State-Of-The-Art and Recent Advances in Quantification for Therapeutic Follow-Up in Oncology Using PET.

Authors:  Thomas Carlier; Clément Bailly
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-03-23

7.  jClustering, an open framework for the development of 4D clustering algorithms.

Authors:  José María Mateos-Pérez; Carmen García-Villalba; Javier Pascau; Manuel Desco; Juan J Vaquero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  FDG PET/CT for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges.

Authors:  Nadia Withofs; Claire Bernard; Catherine Van der Rest; Philippe Martinive; Mathieu Hatt; Sebastien Jodogne; Dimitris Visvikis; John A Lee; Philippe A Coucke; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.