Literature DB >> 28604372

Adaptive region-growing with maximum curvature strategy for tumor segmentation in 18F-FDG PET.

Shan Tan1, Laquan Li, Wookjin Choi, Min Kyu Kang, Warren D D'Souza, Wei Lu.   

Abstract

Accurate tumor segmentation in PET is crucial in many oncology applications. We developed an adaptive region-growing (ARG) algorithm with a maximum curvature strategy (ARG_MC) for tumor segmentation in PET. The ARG_MC repeatedly applied a confidence connected region-growing algorithm with increasing relaxing factor f. The optimal relaxing factor (ORF) was then determined at the transition point on the f-volume curve, where the volume just grew from the tumor into the surrounding normal tissues. The ARG_MC along with five widely used algorithms were tested on a phantom with 6 spheres at different signal to background ratios and on two clinic datasets including 20 patients with esophageal cancer and 11 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The ARG_MC did not require any phantom calibration or any a priori knowledge of the tumor or PET scanner. The identified ORF varied with tumor types (mean ORF  =  9.61, 3.78 and 2.55 respectively for the phantom, esophageal cancer, and NHL datasets), and varied from one tumor to another. For the phantom, the ARG_MC ranked the second in segmentation accuracy with an average Dice similarity index (DSI) of 0.86, only slightly worse than Daisne's adaptive thresholding method (DSI  =  0.87), which required phantom calibration. For both the esophageal cancer dataset and the NHL dataset, the ARG_MC had the highest accuracy with an average DSI of 0.87 and 0.84, respectively. The ARG_MC was robust to parameter settings and region of interest selection, and it did not depend on scanners, imaging protocols, or tumor types. Furthermore, the ARG_MC made no assumption about the tumor size or tumor uptake distribution, making it suitable for segmenting tumors with heterogeneous FDG uptake. In conclusion, the ARG_MC was accurate, robust and easy to use, it provides a highly potential tool for PET tumor segmentation in clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28604372      PMCID: PMC5497763          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6e20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  42 in total

Review 1.  The value of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in disease staging and therapy assessment.

Authors:  G Jerusalem; R Hustinx; Y Beguin; G Fillet
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Segmentation of PET volumes by iterative image thresholding.

Authors:  Walter Jentzen; Lutz Freudenberg; Ernst G Eising; Melanie Heinze; Wolfgang Brandau; Andreas Bockisch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  A novel PET tumor delineation method based on adaptive region-growing and dual-front active contours.

Authors:  Hua Li; Wade L Thorstad; Kenneth J Biehl; Richard Laforest; Yi Su; Kooresh I Shoghi; Eric D Donnelly; Daniel A Low; Wei Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  The current status of FDG-PET in tumour volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Angela van Baardwijk; Brigitta G Baumert; Geert Bosmans; Marinus van Kroonenburgh; Sigrid Stroobants; Vincent Gregoire; Philippe Lambin; Dirk De Ruysscher
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  Simultaneous Tumor Segmentation, Image Restoration, and Blur Kernel Estimation in PET Using Multiple Regularizations.

Authors:  Laquan Li; Jian Wang; Wei Lu; Shan Tan
Journal:  Comput Vis Image Underst       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Quinten C Black; Inga S Grills; Larry L Kestin; Ching-Yee O Wong; John W Wong; Alvaro A Martinez; Di Yan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  PET/CT in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Tinsu Pan; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  18F-FDG PET definition of gross tumor volume for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: is a single standardized uptake value threshold approach appropriate?

Authors:  Kenneth J Biehl; Feng-Ming Kong; Farrokh Dehdashti; Jian-Yue Jin; Sasa Mutic; Issam El Naqa; Barry A Siegel; Jeffrey D Bradley
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  A prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Trevor Leong; Craig Everitt; Kally Yuen; Sara Condron; Andrew Hui; Samuel Y K Ngan; Alexander Pitman; Eddie W F Lau; Michael MacManus; David Binns; Trevor Ackerly; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Modeling pathologic response of esophageal cancer to chemoradiation therapy using spatial-temporal 18F-FDG PET features, clinical parameters, and demographics.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Shan Tan; Wengen Chen; Seth Kligerman; Grace Kim; Warren D D'Souza; Mohan Suntharalingam; Wei Lu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  8 in total

1.  Tumor co-segmentation in PET/CT using multi-modality fully convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Xiangming Zhao; Laquan Li; Wei Lu; Shan Tan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The first MICCAI challenge on PET tumor segmentation.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Baptiste Laurent; Anouar Ouahabi; Hadi Fayad; Shan Tan; Laquan Li; Wei Lu; Vincent Jaouen; Clovis Tauber; Jakub Czakon; Filip Drapejkowski; Witold Dyrka; Sorina Camarasu-Pop; Frédéric Cervenansky; Pascal Girard; Tristan Glatard; Michael Kain; Yao Yao; Christian Barillot; Assen Kirov; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 3.  Radiomics: a primer on high-throughput image phenotyping.

Authors:  Kyle J Lafata; Yuqi Wang; Brandon Konkel; Fang-Fang Yin; Mustafa R Bashir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-08-25

4.  Joint Tumor Segmentation in PET-CT Images Using Co-Clustering and Fusion Based on Belief Functions.

Authors:  Chunfeng Lian; Su Ruan; Thierry Denoeux; Hua Li; Pierre Vera
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 10.856

5.  Deep Learning for Variational Multimodality Tumor Segmentation in PET/CT.

Authors:  Laquan Li; Xiangming Zhao; Wei Lu; Shan Tan
Journal:  Neurocomputing       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.719

6.  A hybrid region growing tumour segmentation method for low contrast and high noise Nuclear Medicine (NM) images by combining a novel non-linear diffusion filter and global gradient measure (HNDF-GGM-RG).

Authors:  Mahbubunnabi Tamal
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-12-11

7.  Diagnostic Value of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Image under Automatic Segmentation Algorithm for Restenosis after Coronary Stenting.

Authors:  Xinrong He; Juan Zhao; Yunpeng Xu; Huini Lei; Xianbin Zhang; Ting Xiao
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 3.009

8.  A preliminary PET radiomics study of brain metastases using a fully automatic segmentation method.

Authors:  Alessandro Stefano; Albert Comelli; Valentina Bravatà; Stefano Barone; Igor Daskalovski; Gaetano Savoca; Maria Gabriella Sabini; Massimo Ippolito; Giorgio Russo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.