Literature DB >> 11797960

Evaluation of three-dimensional finite element-based deformable registration of pre- and intraoperative prostate imaging.

A Bharatha1, M Hirose, N Hata, S K Warfield, M Ferrant, K H Zou, E Suarez-Santana, J Ruiz-Alzola, A D'Amico, R A Cormack, R Kikinis, F A Jolesz, C M Tempany.   

Abstract

In this report we evaluate an image registration technique that can improve the information content of intraoperative image data by deformable matching of preoperative images. In this study, pretreatment 1.5 tesla (T) magnetic resonance (MR) images of the prostate are registered with 0.5 T intraoperative images. The method involves rigid and nonrigid registration using biomechanical finite element modeling. Preoperative 1.5 T MR imaging is conducted with the patient supine, using an endorectal coil, while intraoperatively, the patient is in the lithotomy position with a rectal obturator in place. We have previously observed that these changes in patient position and rectal filling produce a shape change in the prostate. The registration of 1.5 T preoperative images depicting the prostate substructure [namely central gland (CG) and peripheral zone (PZ)] to 0.5 T intraoperative MR images using this method can facilitate the segmentation of the substructure of the gland for radiation treatment planning. After creating and validating a dataset of manually segmented glands from images obtained in ten sequential MR-guided brachytherapy cases, we conducted a set of experiments to assess our hypothesis that the proposed registration system can significantly improve the quality of matching of the total gland (TG), CG, and PZ. The results showed that the method statistically-significantly improves the quality of match (compared to rigid registration), raising the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) from prematched coefficients of 0.81, 0.78, and 0.59 for TG, CG, and PZ, respectively, to 0.94, 0.86, and 0.76. A point-based measure of registration agreement was also improved by the deformable registration. CG and PZ volumes are not changed by the registration, indicating that the method maintains the biomechanical topology of the prostate. Although this strategy was tested for MRI-guided brachytherapy, the preliminary results from these experiments suggest that it may be applied to other settings such as transrectal ultrasound-guided therapy, where the integration of preoperative MRI may have a significant impact upon treatment planning and guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11797960     DOI: 10.1118/1.1414009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  43 in total

1.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation.

Authors:  Simon K Warfield; Kelly H Zou; William M Wells
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Image registration for targeted MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Fiona M Fennessy; Junichi Tokuda; Nobuhiko Hata; William M Wells; Ron Kikinis; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  PROBABILISTIC NON-RIGID REGISTRATION OF PROSTATE IMAGES: MODELING AND QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY.

Authors:  Petter Risholm; Andriy Fedorov; Jennifer Pursley; Kemal Tuncali; Robert Cormack; William M Wells
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2011-06-09

4.  Semi-automatic deformable registration of prostate MR images to pathological slices.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Louisa Bokacheva; Dirk-Jan Kroon; Oguz Akin; Hedvig Hricak; Daniel Chamudot; Samson Fine; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Assessment of dose reconstruction errors in image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Elisabeth Weiss; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  MR-guided prostate interventions.

Authors:  Clare Tempany; Sarah Straus; Nobuhiko Hata; Steven Haker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Deformable medical image registration: a survey.

Authors:  Aristeidis Sotiras; Christos Davatzikos; Nikos Paragios
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Elastic registration of multimodal prostate MRI and histology via multiattribute combined mutual information.

Authors:  Jonathan Chappelow; B Nicolas Bloch; Neil Rofsky; Elizabeth Genega; Robert Lenkinski; William DeWolf; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Effect of material property heterogeneity on biomechanical modeling of prostate under deformation.

Authors:  Navid Samavati; Deirdre M McGrath; Michael A S Jewett; Theo van der Kwast; Cynthia Ménard; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The importance of organ geometry and boundary constraints for planning of medical interventions.

Authors:  S Misra; K J Macura; K T Ramesh; A M Okamura
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.