Literature DB >> 12519847

A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol.

Femke P Hohmann1, Nicholas S Macklon, Bart C J M Fauser.   

Abstract

Extending the FSH window for multifollicular development by administering FSH from the midfollicular phase onward constitutes a novel mild protocol for ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) based on the physiology of single dominant follicle selection in normo-ovulatory women. We compared outcomes from this protocol with two other stimulation protocols. One hundred and forty-two normo-ovulatory patients with an indication for IVF (or IVF/ICSI) were randomized to a GnRH agonist long protocol (group A; n = 45) or one of two GnRH antagonist protocols commencing recombinant FSH on cycle d 2 (group B; n = 48) or cycle d 5 (group C; n = 49). A fixed dose (150 IU/d) of rFSH was used for ovarian stimulation, and GnRH antagonist cotreatment was initiated on the day when the leading follicle reached 14 mm diameter. Group C showed a shorter duration of stimulation (median duration, 11, 9, and 8 d for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P < 0.001), reflected in a significantly lower total dose of rFSH used (median amount of rFSH, 1650, 1350, and 1200 IU for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P < 0.001). In group C more cycles were cancelled during the stimulation phase due to insufficient response, resulting in a lower percentage of oocyte retrievals (84%, 73%, and 63% for groups A, B, and C; P = 0.02). However, women in group C obtained better quality embryos (percentage of embryo score of 1 for best embryo, 29%, 37%, and 61% for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P = 0.008), resulting in more transfers per oocyte retrieval (68%, 71%, and 90% for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P = 0.04). After profound ovarian stimulation (groups A and B) only 7% of the patients who retrieved four oocytes or less conceived, whereas after mild stimulation (group C) 67% of these patients conceived (P < 0.01). Overall, no differences were found among the three groups comparing pregnancy rate per started IVF cycle. In conclusion, application of the described mild ovarian stimulation protocol resulted in pregnancy rates per started IVF cycle similar to those observed after profound stimulation with GnRH agonist cotreatment despite shorter stimulation and a 27% reduction in exogenous FSH. A higher cancellation rate before oocyte retrieval was compensated by improved embryo quality concomitant with a higher chance of undergoing embryo transfer. A relatively low number of oocytes retrieved after mild ovarian stimulation distinctly differs from the pathological reduction in the number of oocytes retrieved after profound ovarian stimulation (poor response) associated with poor IVF outcome. The relatively small number of oocytes obtained after mild ovarian stimulation may represent the best of the cohort in a given cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12519847     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2002-020788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  51 in total

1.  Contributing factors for the incidence of aneuploidy in older patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A universal method for sequential immunofluorescent analysis of chromatin and chromatin-associated proteins on chromosome spreads.

Authors:  Christine van de Werken; Holger Jahr; Margarida Avo Santos; Cindy Eleveld; Joyce Schuilwerve; Joop S E Laven; Esther B Baart
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Accumulation of oocytes from a few modified natural cycles to improve IVF results: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Katarzyna Litwicka; Cristiana Arrivi; Maria Teresa Varricchio; Daniela Zavaglia; Cecilia Mencacci; Maria Giulia Minasi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The decrease of serum luteinizing hormone level by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist following the mild IVF stimulation protocol for IVF and its clinical outcome.

Authors:  Atsushi Yanaihara; Takeshi Yorimitsu; Hiroshi Motoyama; Motohiro Ohara; Toshihiro Kawamura
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Why more is less and less is more when it comes to ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Zeev Blumenfeld
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Effect of lower than expected number of oocyte on the IVF results after oocyte-pickup.

Authors:  Süheyla Gonca; Ismet Gün; Ali Ovayolu; Dilek Silfeler; Kenan Sofuoğlu; Ozkan Ozdamar; Ali Yilmaz; Gülden Tunali
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-07-15

7.  Efficacy and safety of late-start Corifollitropin-alfa administration for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF: a cohort, case-control study.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Giulia Pittatore; Simona Casano; Stefano Canosa; Francesca Evangelista; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Patient selection criteria for blastocyst transfers in extended embryo culture programs.

Authors:  Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Rogério Bonassi Machado; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  The effect of oral contraceptive pill for cycle scheduling prior to GnRH-antagonist protocol on IVF cycle parameters and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Haim Pinkas; Onit Sapir; Ori M Avrech; Avi Ben-Haroush; Jacob Ashkenzi; Benjamin Fisch; Jacob Farhi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Use of stimulated serum estradiol measurements for the prediction of hyperresponse to ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Authors:  D J Hendriks; E R Klinkert; L F J M M Bancsi; C W N Looman; J D F Habbema; E R te Velde; F J Broekmans
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.