Literature DB >> 11882727

The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization.

Michèle Hansen1, Jennifer J Kurinczuk, Carol Bower, Sandra Webb.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether infants conceived with use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection or in vitro fertilization have a higher risk of birth defects than infants conceived naturally.
METHODS: We obtained data from three registries in Western Australia on births, births after assisted conception, and major birth defects in infants born between 1993 and 1997. We assessed the prevalence of major birth defects diagnosed by one year of age in infants conceived naturally or with use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection or in vitro fertilization.
RESULTS: Twenty-six of the 301 infants conceived with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (8.6 percent) and 75 of the 837 infants conceived with in vitro fertilization (9.0 percent) had a major birth defect diagnosed by one year of age, as compared with 168 of the 4000 naturally conceived infants (4.2 percent; P<0.001 for the comparison between either type of technology and natural conception). As compared with natural conception, the odds ratio for a major birth defect by one year of age, after adjustment for maternal age and parity, the sex of the infant, and correlation between siblings, was 2.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.2) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and 2.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 2.9) with in vitro fertilization. Infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology were more likely than naturally conceived infants to have multiple major defects and to have chromosomal and musculoskeletal defects.
CONCLUSIONS: Infants conceived with use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection or in vitro fertilization have twice as high a risk of a major birth defect as naturally conceived infants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11882727     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa010035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  169 in total

1.  Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Suleena Kansal Kalra; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Christos Coutifaris; Thomas Molinaro; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Should HIV discordant couples have access to assisted reproductive technologies?

Authors:  M Spriggs; T Charles
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Health risks in babies born after assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Alastair G Sutcliffe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-20

4.  Dilemma of increased obstetric risk in pregnancies following IVF-ET.

Authors:  J Zádori; Z Kozinszky; H Orvos; M Katona; A Pál; L Kovács
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: a call for investigation.

Authors:  Emily L Niemitz; Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Shi Wu Wen; Mark Walker; Marie-Claude Léveillé; Art Leader
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  In vitro culture of mouse embryos reduces differential gene expression between inner cell mass and trophectoderm.

Authors:  G Giritharan; L Delle Piane; A Donjacour; F J Esteban; J A Horcajadas; E Maltepe; P Rinaudo
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.060

8.  Contributing factors for the incidence of aneuploidy in older patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Apoptosis and DNA damage in human spermatozoa.

Authors:  R John Aitken; Adam J Koppers
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Identifying women with indicators of subfertility in a statewide population database: operationalizing the missing link in assisted reproductive technology research.

Authors:  Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Mark D Hornstein; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.