OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitude and factors affecting decision-making by offspring for life-sustaining measures toward their elderly terminally ill parents. DESIGN: Survey SETTING: Acute geriatric department of a university-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 108 offspring of 48 terminally ill elderly patients were interviewed. MEASUREMENTS: The attitude of offspring regarding life-sustaining measures based on a comprehensive questionnaire, administered by face-to-face interview, that included clinical, social, and religious information for each patient and social, religious, demographic, and educational information for each family member. RESULTS: A significant majority requested the continuation of fluid, nutrition, and medication (78%, 66%, 73%, respectively). A minority of 25%-29% requested the initiation of resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, and dialysis. Active euthanasia was requested by seven offspring. Factors that significantly affected offspring's decisions were the degree of religious observance and close relationship. Approximately 50% of offspring believed they knew their parents' wishes, but most of them did not comply with the parents' wishes. The offspring's preferences for themselves differed in important aspects from the requests for their parents. The great majority stated that a family member and/or the responsible physician should be involved in the decision-making process (76% and 79%, respectively). Only 2.0% suggested the participation of an ethics committee, and the court was rejected by all. CONCLUSIONS: Basic life-sustaining measures are requested for the terminally ill parents by most of the offspring. A significant minority even requested aggressive life-sustaining measures. The degree of religiosity and closeness of relationship influenced offspring's request most strongly.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitude and factors affecting decision-making by offspring for life-sustaining measures toward their elderly terminally ill parents. DESIGN: Survey SETTING: Acute geriatric department of a university-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 108 offspring of 48 terminally ill elderly patients were interviewed. MEASUREMENTS: The attitude of offspring regarding life-sustaining measures based on a comprehensive questionnaire, administered by face-to-face interview, that included clinical, social, and religious information for each patient and social, religious, demographic, and educational information for each family member. RESULTS: A significant majority requested the continuation of fluid, nutrition, and medication (78%, 66%, 73%, respectively). A minority of 25%-29% requested the initiation of resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, and dialysis. Active euthanasia was requested by seven offspring. Factors that significantly affected offspring's decisions were the degree of religious observance and close relationship. Approximately 50% of offspring believed they knew their parents' wishes, but most of them did not comply with the parents' wishes. The offspring's preferences for themselves differed in important aspects from the requests for their parents. The great majority stated that a family member and/or the responsible physician should be involved in the decision-making process (76% and 79%, respectively). Only 2.0% suggested the participation of an ethics committee, and the court was rejected by all. CONCLUSIONS: Basic life-sustaining measures are requested for the terminally ill parents by most of the offspring. A significant minority even requested aggressive life-sustaining measures. The degree of religiosity and closeness of relationship influenced offspring's request most strongly.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship; Shaare Zedek Medical Center (Jerusalem)
Authors: Rebecca S Allen; Shermetra R DeLaine; William F Chaplin; Daniel C Marson; Michelle S Bourgeois; Katinka Dijkstra; Louis D Burgio Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2003-06
Authors: Maureen E Lyon; Paige L Williams; Elizabeth R Woods; Nancy Hutton; Anne M Butler; Erica Sibinga; Michael T Brady; James M Oleske Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Kah Poh Loh; Enrique Soto Pérez de Celis; Paul R Duberstein; Eva Culakova; Ronald M Epstein; Huiwen Xu; Sindhuja Kadambi; Marie Flannery; Allison Magnuson; Colin McHugh; Kelly M Trevino; Gina Tuch; Erika Ramsdale; Reza Yousefi-Nooraie; Margaret Sedenquist; Jane Jijun Liu; Nataliya Melnyk; Jodi Geer; Supriya G Mohile Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 6.921