Literature DB >> 1862422

Correlation of radiologic assessment of lumbar spine fusions with surgical exploration.

A E Brodsky1, E S Kovalsky, M A Khalil.   

Abstract

Although inspection of posterolateral lumbar fusion is the best method of determining its solidity, routine exploration of the fusion is somewhat impractical because of the morbidity and expense involved. Removal of internal fixation devices or implantable batteries or reoperation for failed back surgery enabled the exploration and assessment of lumbar spine fusions in 214 operations on 175 patients. The preoperative radiologic assessment (plain roentgenographs, polytomography, bending films, and computed tomographic scans) were correlated with surgical findings. This study indicated a significant percentage of inaccuracy of all radiologic modalities used. Noncorrelations were present in 36% of plain roentgenographs, 41% of polytomograms, 38% of bending films, and 43% of computed tomographic scans. Radiologic inaccuracy was manifest on both the positive and negative sides. Computed tomographic scanning presented the lowest percentage of inaccuracy (22%) and bending films the highest percentage (27%). Based on these findings, there exists the need for more accurate noninvasive methods to determine the solidity of spine fusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1862422     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199106001-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  44 in total

1.  Interobserver agreement in fusion status assessment after instrumental desis of the lower lumbar spine using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: impact of observer experience.

Authors:  Borislav Laoutliev; Inger Havsteen; Birthe Højlund Bech; Eva Narvestad; Hanne Christensen; Anders Christensen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Development of a per-operative procedure for concentrated bone marrow adjunction in postero-lateral lumbar fusion: radiological, biological and clinical assessment.

Authors:  G A Odri; A Hami; V Pomero; M Seite; D Heymann; A Bertrand-Vasseur; W Skalli; J Delecrin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Interobservational variation in determining fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures.

Authors:  Kostas N Fountas; Eftychia Z Kapsalaki; Betsy E Smith; Leonidas G Nikolakakos; Charles H Richardson; Hugh F Smisson; Joe S Robinson; David C Parish
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Quantitative analysis in outcome assessment of instrumented lumbosacral arthrodesis.

Authors:  Sabina Champain; Christian Mazel; Anca Mitulescu; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Observer agreement in assessing flexion-extension X-rays of the cervical spine, with and without the use of quantitative measurements of intervertebral motion.

Authors:  Mehul Taylor; John A Hipp; Stanley D Gertzbein; Shankar Gopinath; Charles A Reitman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  The efficacy of rhBMP-2 versus autograft for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in elderly patients.

Authors:  Kwang-Bok Lee; Cyrus E Taghavi; Margaret S Hsu; Kyung-Jin Song; Jeong Hyun Yoo; Gun Keorochana; Stephanie S Ngo; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Posterolateral lumbar fusion using facet joint fixation with biodegradable rods: a pilot study.

Authors:  R Johnsson; P Axelsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Spinal fusion: a combined anterior and supplementary interspinous technique.

Authors:  M W Fidler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation.

Authors:  Rajesh R Shah; Saeed Mohammed; Asif Saifuddin; Benjamin A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Allogenic versus autologous cancellous bone in lumbar segmental spondylodesis: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Patrick Strube; Julia F Funk; Christian Gross; Hans-Joachim Mönig; Carsten Perka; Axel Pruss
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.