Literature DB >> 22633697

The neural bases of difficult speech comprehension and speech production: Two Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses.

Patti Adank1.   

Abstract

The role of speech production mechanisms in difficult speech comprehension is the subject of on-going debate in speech science. Two Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) analyses were conducted on neuroimaging studies investigating difficult speech comprehension or speech production. Meta-analysis 1 included 10 studies contrasting comprehension of less intelligible/distorted speech with more intelligible speech. Meta-analysis 2 (21 studies) identified areas associated with speech production. The results indicate that difficult comprehension involves increased reliance of cortical regions in which comprehension and production overlapped (bilateral anterior Superior Temporal Sulcus (STS) and anterior Supplementary Motor Area (pre-SMA)) and in an area associated with intelligibility processing (left posterior MTG), and second involves increased reliance on cortical areas associated with general executive processes (bilateral anterior insulae). Comprehension of distorted speech may be supported by a hybrid neural mechanism combining increased involvement of areas associated with general executive processing and areas shared between comprehension and production.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22633697     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  55 in total

1.  Differential activation of the visual word form area during auditory phoneme perception in youth with dyslexia.

Authors:  Lisa L Conant; Einat Liebenthal; Anjali Desai; Mark S Seidenberg; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The cingulo-opercular network provides word-recognition benefit.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Stephanie L Cute; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A possible functional localizer for identifying brain regions sensitive to sentence-level prosody.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Po-Jang Hsieh; Zuzanna Balewski
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Cory Shain; Idan Asher Blank; Marten van Schijndel; William Schuler; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Neural integration of language production and comprehension.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Simon Garrod
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The role of the insula in speech and language processing.

Authors:  Anna Oh; Emma G Duerden; Elizabeth W Pang
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Cingulo-opercular activity affects incidental memory encoding for speech in noise.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Cortical activity predicts which older adults recognize speech in noise and when.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Yi Du; Lori J Bernstein; Thijs Barten; Karen Banai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  The neural processing of masked speech.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.