Literature DB >> 22632912

Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections.

Elizabeth C Wick1, Deborah B Hobson, Jennifer L Bennett, Renee Demski, Lisa Maragakis, Susan L Gearhart, Jonathan Efron, Sean M Berenholtz, Martin A Makary.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are a common and costly problem, prolonging hospitalization and increasing readmission. Adherence to well-known infection control process measures has not been associated with substantial reductions in SSI. To date, the global burden of preventable SSI continues to result in patient harm and increased health care costs on a broad scale. STUDY
DESIGN: We designed a study to evaluate the association between implementation of a surgery-based comprehensive unit-based safety program (CUSP) and postoperative SSI rates. One year of pre- and post-CUSP intervention SSI rates were collected using the high-risk pilot module of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (July 2009 to July 2011). The CUSP group met monthly and consisted of a multidisciplinary team of front-line providers (eg, surgeons, nurses, operating room technicians, and anesthesiologists) who were directly involved in the care of colorectal surgery patients. Surgical Care Improvement Project process measure compliance was monitored using standard methods from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
RESULTS: In the 12 months before implementation of the CUSP and interventions, the mean SSI rate was 27.3% (76 of 278 patients). After commencement of interventions, the rate was 18.2% (59 of 324 patients) for the subsequent 12 months--a 33.3% decrease (95% CI, 9-58%; p < 0.05). The interventions included standardization of skin preparation; administration of preoperative chlorhexidine showers; selective elimination of mechanical bowel preparation; warming of patients in the preanesthesia area; adoption of enhanced sterile techniques for skin and fascial closure; addressing previously unrecognized lapses in antibiotic prophylaxis. There was no difference in surgical process measure compliance as measured by the Surgical Care Improvement Project during the same time period.
CONCLUSIONS: Formation of small groups of front-line providers to address patient harm using local wisdom and existing evidence can improve patient safety. We demonstrate a surgery-based CUSP intervention that might have markedly decreased SSI in a high-risk population.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22632912     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  41 in total

1.  Enabling front line-driven perioperative quality improvement through organizational infrastructure built around the Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program.

Authors:  Husein Moloo; Rebecca Brooke; Sudhir Sundaresan; Brigitte Skinner; Alan Berg; Paula Doering; James Worthington; Alan Forster; David Schramm
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Value: a framework for radiation oncology.

Authors:  Sewit Teckie; Susan A McCloskey; Michael L Steinberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  What is the effect of stoma construction on surgical site infection after colorectal surgery?

Authors:  Rocco Ricciardi; Patricia L Roberts; Jason F Hall; Thomas E Read; Todd D Francone; Scott N Pinchot; David J Schoetz; Peter W Marcello
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update.

Authors:  Deverick J Anderson; Kelly Podgorny; Sandra I Berríos-Torres; Dale W Bratzler; E Patchen Dellinger; Linda Greene; Ann-Christine Nyquist; Lisa Saiman; Deborah S Yokoe; Lisa L Maragakis; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  A checklist-based intervention to improve surgical outcomes in Michigan: evaluation of the Keystone Surgery program.

Authors:  Bradley N Reames; Robert W Krell; Darrell A Campbell; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 6.  Objective Assessment of Quality Measurement and Improvement.

Authors:  Aneel Damle; Karim Alavi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-03

7.  Risk of surgical site infection in older patients in a cohort survey: targets for quality improvement in antibiotic prophylaxis.

Authors:  Antonella Agodi; Annalisa Quattrocchi; Martina Barchitta; Veronica Adornetto; Aldo Cocuzza; Rosalia Latino; Giovanni Li Destri; Antonio Di Cataldo
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 8.  Bundles Prevent Surgical Site Infections After Colorectal Surgery: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aleksander Zywot; Christine S M Lau; H Stephen Fletcher; Subroto Paul
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Variation in surgical quality measure adherence within hospital referral regions: do publicly reported surgical quality measures distinguish among hospitals that patients are likely to compare?

Authors:  Kyan C Safavi; Feng Dai; Todd A Gilbertsen; Robert B Schonberger
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Data-driven Temporal Prediction of Surgical Site Infection.

Authors:  Cristina Soguero-Ruiz; Wang M E Fei; Robert Jenssen; Knut Magne Augestad; José-Luis Rojo Álvarez; Inmaculada Mora Jiménez; Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo; Stein Olav Skrøvseth
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.