Literature DB >> 27053926

Objective Assessment of Quality Measurement and Improvement.

Aneel Damle1, Karim Alavi2.   

Abstract

Accurate quality measurement that allows for and results in improvement is essential to colon and rectal surgery. Currently, no consensus exists as to which variables are most important in measuring outcomes. Debate continues concerning the "best" variables to measure from a structural, process, and outcomes standpoint. Although American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program provides an opportunity for outcomes measurement in general and vascular surgery, there is no specific quality improvement tool available for colon and rectal surgery. However, there is growing literature testing the validity of candidate variables to be used in such a data collection system. This article evaluates the current objective assessment measurements used for quality improvement in colon and rectal surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal; outcomes; processes; quality improvement; quality measure

Year:  2014        PMID: 27053926      PMCID: PMC4812664          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1366915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  30 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project.

Authors:  Dale W Bratzler; Peter M Houck
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.

Authors:  Bruce L Hall; Barton H Hamilton; Karen Richards; Karl Y Bilimoria; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  D R Prytherch; M S Whiteley; B Higgins; P C Weaver; W G Prout; S J Powell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.

Authors:  G A Porter; C L Soskolne; W W Yakimets; S C Newman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Reoperation as a quality indicator in colorectal surgery: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Arden M Morris; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Barbara Matthews; Jason A Dominitz; William E Barlow; Sharon A Dobie; Kevin G Billingsley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Wick; Deborah B Hobson; Jennifer L Bennett; Renee Demski; Lisa Maragakis; Susan L Gearhart; Jonathan Efron; Sean M Berenholtz; Martin A Makary
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Variability in length of stay after colorectal surgery: assessment of 182 hospitals in the national surgical quality improvement program.

Authors:  Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Clifford Y Ko; Karen Richards; Bruce L Hall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe in the high-risk patient: a NSQIP risk-adjusted analysis.

Authors:  Carol A McCloskey; Mark A Wilson; Steven J Hughes; George M Eid
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  National Cancer Institute designation predicts improved outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Emily Carter Paulson; Nandita Mitra; Seema Sonnad; Katrina Armstrong; Christopher Wirtalla; Rachel Rapaport Kelz; Najjia N Mahmoud
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Olga Jonasson; R Scott Jones; Darrell A Campbell; Aaron S Fink; Robert M Mentzer; Leigh Neumayer; Karl Hammermeister; Cecilia Mosca; Nancy Healey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Quality Assurance, Metrics, and Improving Standards in Rectal Cancer Surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Zhaomin Xu; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Associations of Postoperative Complications Assessed by Clavien-Dindo Classification and Comprehensive Complication Index with Long-Term Overall Survival in Elderly Patients after Radical CRC Resection.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Jinghui Zhang; Zhigang Bai; Yingchi Yang; Tingting Wang; Lan Jin; Jin Wang; Guocong Wu; Tiankuo Kou; Zhongtao Zhang
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.458

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.