Literature DB >> 24408182

What is the effect of stoma construction on surgical site infection after colorectal surgery?

Rocco Ricciardi1, Patricia L Roberts, Jason F Hall, Thomas E Read, Todd D Francone, Scott N Pinchot, David J Schoetz, Peter W Marcello.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of stoma creation on deep and superficial surgical site infections after an index colorectal surgical procedure.
METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We evaluated all patients who underwent colorectal surgery procedures from January 2005 to December 2009 with or without creation of a stoma and sought to identify the effect of stoma creation on deep and superficial surgical site infections.
RESULTS: A total of 79,775 patients underwent colorectal procedures (laparoscopic 30.7%, open 69.3%), while 8,113 patients developed a surgical site infection (10.2%). The univariate analysis revealed that surgical site infections were much more common in patients with a stoma compared to those with no stoma (11.8% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, stoma construction during the index colorectal procedure (OR 1.3, CI 1.2 to 1.4), ASA class ≥2, smoking, and abnormal body mass index were associated with surgical site infection.
CONCLUSIONS: The construction of a stoma with colorectal procedures is associated with a higher risk of surgical site infection. Although the stoma effect on surgical site infection is attenuated with laparoscopic techniques, the association remained statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24408182     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2439-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  14 in total

1.  Effect of surgical approach on 30-day mortality and morbidity after elective colectomy: a NSQIP study.

Authors:  Molly M Cone; Daniel O Herzig; Brian S Diggs; Jennifer D Rea; Karin M Hardiman; Kim C Lu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Surgical care improvement: should performance measures have performance measures.

Authors:  Mary T Hawn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement.

Authors:  Angela M Ingraham; Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Justin B Dimick; Karen E Richards; Mehul V Raval; Lee A Fleisher; Bruce L Hall; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Use of national surgical quality improvement program data as a catalyst for quality improvement.

Authors:  Katherine S Rowell; Florence E Turrentine; Matthew M Hutter; Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; J Demakis; J B Aust; V Chong; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G Irvin; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Surgical considerations of endogenous infections--sources, types, and methods of control.

Authors:  W A Altemeier; W R Culbertson; R P Hummel
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Comparison of hospital performance in nonemergency versus emergency colorectal operations at 142 hospitals.

Authors:  Angela M Ingraham; Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Joseph M Feinglass; Karen E Richards; Bruce Lee Hall; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Wick; Deborah B Hobson; Jennifer L Bennett; Renee Demski; Lisa Maragakis; Susan L Gearhart; Jonathan Efron; Sean M Berenholtz; Martin A Makary
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 9.  Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Katia F Güenaga; Delcio Matos; Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

10.  Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System.

Authors:  D H Culver; T C Horan; R P Gaynes; W J Martone; W R Jarvis; T G Emori; S N Banerjee; J R Edwards; J S Tolson; T S Henderson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-09-16       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  3 in total

1.  The use of an implemented infection prevention bundle reduces the incidence of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: a retrospective single center analysis.

Authors:  Damiano Caputo; Alessandro Coppola; Tommaso Farolfi; Vincenzo La Vaccara; Silvia Angeletti; Chiara Cascone; Massimo Ciccozzi; Roberto Coppola
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-05

2.  The minimally invasive approach is associated with reduced surgical site infections in obese patients undergoing proctectomy.

Authors:  R T Pasam; I O Esemuede; S A Lee-Kong; R P Kiran
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  The preventive surgical site infection bundle in patients with colorectal perforation.

Authors:  Takehito Yamamoto; Takeshi Morimoto; Ryosuke Kita; Hideyuki Masui; Hiromitsu Kinoshita; Yusuke Sakamoto; Kazuyuki Okada; Junji Komori; Akira Miki; Masato Kondo; Kenji Uryuhara; Hiroyuki Kobayashi; Hiroki Hashida; Satoshi Kaihara; Ryo Hosotani
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.