Literature DB >> 22631873

Validation of radiocarpal joint contact models based on images from a clinical MRI scanner.

Joshua E Johnson1, Terence E McIff, Phil Lee, E Bruce Toby, Kenneth J Fischer.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiocarpal surface contact models of functional loading in a clinical MRI scanner for future in vivo studies, by comparison with experimental measures from three cadaver forearm specimens. Experimental data were acquired using a Tekscan sensor during simulated light grasp. Magnetic resonance (MR) images were used to obtain model geometry and kinematics (image registration). Peak contact pressures (PPs) and average contact pressures (APs), contact forces and contact areas were determined in the radiolunate and radioscaphoid joints. Contact area was also measured directly from MR images acquired with load and compared with model data. Based on the validation criteria (within 25% of experimental data), out of the six articulations (three specimens with two articulations each), two met the criterion for AP (0%, 14%); one for peak pressure (20%); one for contact force (5%); four for contact area with respect to experiment (8%, 13%, 19% and 23%), and three contact areas met the criterion with respect to direct measurements (14%, 21% and 21%). Absolute differences between model and experimental PPs were reasonably low (within 2.5 MPa). Overall, the results indicate that MRI-based models generated from 3T clinical MR scanner appear sufficient to obtain clinically relevant data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contact modelling; magnetic resonance imaging; radiocarpal joint; validation; wrist

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22631873      PMCID: PMC3432301          DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2012.684446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  47 in total

1.  A Mathematical Formulation for 3D Quasi-Static Multibody Models of Diarthrodial Joints.

Authors:  S. D. Kwak; L. Blankevoort; G. A. Ateshian
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the cartilaginous structures in the human temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  M Beek; J H Koolstra; L J van Ruijven; T M van Eijden
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Experimental evaluation of an elastic foundation model to predict contact pressures in knee replacements.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Yanhong Bei; Mark E Sylvester
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of the modified double-plating fixation for the distal radius fracture.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Kathy Cheng; Chun-Li Lin; Yu-Hao Lin; Alvin Chao-Yu Chen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Physical validation of a patient-specific contact finite element model of the ankle.

Authors:  Donald D Anderson; Jane K Goldsworthy; Wendy Li; M James Rudert; Yuki Tochigi; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The influence of wire positioning upon the initial stability of scaphoid fractures fixed using Kirschner wires A finite element study.

Authors:  F Ezquerro; S Jiménez; A Pérez; M Prado; G de Diego; A Simón
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  A contact-coupled finite element analysis of the radiocarpal joint.

Authors:  D D Anderson; T E Daniel
Journal:  Semin Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-01

8.  Simple analytical dual-band spectral-spatial RF pulses for B(1) + and susceptibility artifact reduction in gradient echo MRI.

Authors:  Cungeng Yang; Weiran Deng; V Andrew Stenger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Patient-specific knee joint finite element model validation with high-accuracy kinematics from biplane dynamic Roentgen stereogrammetric analysis.

Authors:  G Papaioannou; G Nianios; C Mitrogiannis; D Fyhrie; S Tashman; K H Yang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  A computer simulation study of normal and abnormal hip joint contact pressure.

Authors:  E Genda; N Konishi; Y Hasegawa; T Miura
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  5 in total

1.  Computationally efficient magnetic resonance imaging based surface contact modeling as a tool to evaluate joint injuries and outcomes of surgical interventions compared to finite element modeling.

Authors:  Joshua E Johnson; Phil Lee; Terence E McIff; E Bruce Toby; Kenneth J Fischer
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Prolonged high force high repetition pulling induces osteocyte apoptosis and trabecular bone loss in distal radius, while low force high repetition pulling induces bone anabolism.

Authors:  Mary F Barbe; Vicky S Massicotte; Soroush Assari; M Alexandra Monroy; Nagat Frara; Michele Y Harris; Mamta Amin; Tamara King; Geneva E Cruz; Steve N Popoff
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Radiocarpal Contact Pressures Are Not Altered after Scapholunate Ligament Tears.

Authors:  Hailey P Huddleston; Joey S Kurtzman; Kenneth H Levy; Katherine M Connors; Westley T Hayes; Steven M Koehler
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2021-07-14

4.  Effectiveness of surgical reconstruction to restore radiocarpal joint mechanics after scapholunate ligament injury: an in vivo modeling study.

Authors:  Joshua E Johnson; Phil Lee; Terence E McIff; E Bruce Toby; Kenneth J Fischer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  A 3D contact analysis approach for the visualization of the electrical contact asperities.

Authors:  Constantinos C Roussos; Jonathan Swingler
Journal:  AIP Adv       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 1.548

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.