Literature DB >> 22626971

ESR1 gene status correlates with estrogen receptor protein levels measured by ligand binding assay and immunohistochemistry.

Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm1, Ann Knoop, Bent Ejlertsen, Tine Rudbeck, Maj-Britt Jensen, Sven Müller, Anne Elisabeth Lykkesfeldt, Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen, Kirsten Vang Nielsen.   

Abstract

The Estrogen Receptor (ER) is an established predictive marker for the selection of adjuvant endocrine treatment in early breast cancer. During the 1990s Immunohistochemistry (IHC) replaced cytosol based assays for determination of ER status. This study examined the association between ER protein level determined by two different methods and ESR1 gene copy number. From 289 primary high-risk breast cancer patients, randomized in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) 77C trial, results from cytosolic ER levels were available from ligand binding assays. Archival tumor tissue was retrieved from 257 patients. ESR1/CEN-6 ratio was analyzed successfully by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in 220 (86%) patients. ESR1 amplification (ESR1/CEN-6 ≥ 2.00) was observed in 23% of the patients and ESR1 deletion (ESR1/CEN-6 < 0.80) was observed in 32%. Further, we identified ESR1 gain (ratio ESR1/CEN-6 from 1.30 to 1.99) in 19% of the patients. A positive correlation of ESR1 FISH with both ER-cytosol and ER IHC was found (p < 0.0001). Amplification and gain of the ESR1 gene are associated with higher ER protein content measured by ligand binding assay and a more intense nuclear staining by IHC compared to tumors with normal ESR1 gene status. Major variations in ER measured by ligand binding assay and IHC are observed within all ESR1 copy number subgroups and other mechanisms than gene copy number seem to contribute to the ER protein content in the tumors.
Copyright © 2012 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22626971      PMCID: PMC5528359          DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2012.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Oncol        ISSN: 1574-7891            Impact factor:   6.603


  36 in total

1.  ESR1 gene amplification in breast cancer: a common phenomenon?

Authors:  Hugo M Horlings; Anna Bergamaschi; Silje H Nordgard; Young H Kim; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh; Keyan Salari; Simon A Joosse; Fabien Reyal; Ole Christian Lingjaerde; Vessela N Kristensen; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Jonathan Pollack; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Standards for the assessment of estrogen receptors in human breast cancer. Report of a workshop on September 29, 1972, at the Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Huis, Amsterdam.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Short recurrence-free survival associated with high oestrogen receptor levels in the natural history of postmenopausal, primary breast cancer.

Authors:  S M Thorpe; I J Christensen; B B Rasmussen; C Rose
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Immunohistochemical assessment of oestrogen and progesterone receptors: correlations with the DCC method and clinical outcome in primary breast cancer patients.

Authors:  D A Grabau; S M Thorpe; A Knoop; W Vach; H D Schrøder; M Blichert-Toft; N N Al-Suliman; H P Graversen; C Rose
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 7.  NCCN Task Force Report: Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  D Craig Allred; Robert W Carlson; Donald A Berry; Harold J Burstein; Stephen B Edge; Lori J Goldstein; Allen Gown; M Elizabeth Hammond; James Dirk Iglehart; Susan Moench; Lori J Pierce; Peter Ravdin; Stuart J Schnitt; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  Estrogen Receptor analyses in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. History, methods, prognosis and clinical implications.

Authors:  Maj-Lis M Talman; Birgitte B Rasmussen; Jørn Andersen; Ib J Christensen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  Amplification of HER2 and TOP2A and deletion of TOP2A genes in breast cancer investigated by new FISH probes.

Authors:  Karen E Olsen; Helle Knudsen; Birgitte B Rasmussen; Eva Balslev; Ann Knoop; Bent Ejlertsen; Kirsten V Nielsen; Andreas Schönau; Jens Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.089

10.  Estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) gene amplification is frequent in breast cancer.

Authors:  Frederik Holst; Phillip R Stahl; Christian Ruiz; Olaf Hellwinkel; Zeenath Jehan; Marc Wendland; Annette Lebeau; Luigi Terracciano; Khawla Al-Kuraya; Fritz Jänicke; Guido Sauter; Ronald Simon
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  7 in total

1.  ESR1 gene status correlates with estrogen receptor protein levels measured by ligand binding assay and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm; Ann Knoop; Bent Ejlertsen; Tine Rudbeck; Maj-Britt Jensen; Sven Müller; Anne Elisabeth Lykkesfeldt; Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen; Kirsten Vang Nielsen
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  Estrogen receptor alpha gene amplification in breast cancer: 25 years of debate.

Authors:  Frederik Holst
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-10

3.  Associations of parity-related reproductive histories with ER± and HER2± receptor-specific breast cancer aetiology.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Jan Wohlfahrt; Bent Ejlertsen; Maj-Britt Jensen; Niels Kroman
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Divergent estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer trends and etiologic heterogeneity in Denmark.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Lucia Petito; Hormuzd A Katki; Bent Ejlertsen; Marianne Ewertz; Birgitte B Rasmussen; Maj-Britt Jensen; Niels Kroman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  In-silico prediction of drug targets, biological activities, signal pathways and regulating networks of dioscin based on bioinformatics.

Authors:  Lianhong Yin; Lingli Zheng; Lina Xu; Deshi Dong; Xu Han; Yan Qi; Yanyan Zhao; Youwei Xu; Jinyong Peng
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.659

6.  Genomic copy number alterations as biomarkers for triple negative pregnancy-associated breast cancer.

Authors:  B B M Suelmann; A Rademaker; C van Dooijeweert; E van der Wall; P J van Diest; C B Moelans
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 7.051

7.  ESR1 amplification in breast cancer by optimized RNase FISH: frequent but low-level and heterogeneous.

Authors:  Cathy B Moelans; Frederik Holst; Olaf Hellwinkel; Ronald Simon; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.