Literature DB >> 23616071

Divergent estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer trends and etiologic heterogeneity in Denmark.

William F Anderson1, Philip S Rosenberg, Lucia Petito, Hormuzd A Katki, Bent Ejlertsen, Marianne Ewertz, Birgitte B Rasmussen, Maj-Britt Jensen, Niels Kroman.   

Abstract

Long-term breast cancer trends in incidence in the United States (US) show rising estrogen receptor (ER)-positive rates and falling ER-negative rates. We hypothesized that these divergent trends reflect etiologic heterogeneity and that comparable trends should be observed in other countries with similar risk factor profiles. Therefore, we analyzed invasive female breast cancers in Denmark, a country with similar risk factors as the US. We summarized the overall trend in age-standardized rates with the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) statistic (1993-2010) and used age-period-cohort models to estimate age-specific EAPCs, cohort rate ratios and projections for future time periods (2011-2018). In Denmark, the overall rate of ER-positive cancers rose between 1993 and 2010 by 3.0% per year (95% CI: 2.8-3.3% per year), whereas the overall rate of ER-negative cancers fell by 2.1% per year (95% CI: -2.5 to -1.6% per year). The ER-positive rate increased fastest among postmenopausal women and the ER-negative rate decreased fastest among premenopausal women, reflecting that cohorts born after 1944 were at relatively higher risk of ER-positive tumors and lower risk of ER-negative tumors. If current trends continue, ER-positive cancers will increase at least 13% by 2018 in Denmark, ER-negative cancers will fall 15% by 2018, and breast cancer overall will increase at least 7% by 2018. Divergent ER-specific trends are consistent with distinct etiologic pathways. If trends in known risk factors are responsible, the Danish and US experience may foreshadow a common pattern worldwide.
Copyright © 2013 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age-period-cohort models; breast cancer; epidemiology; estrogen receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23616071      PMCID: PMC3749265          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  27 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates.

Authors:  T R Holford
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening.

Authors:  My von Euler-Chelpin; Anne Helene Olsen; Sisse Njor; Ilse Vejborg; Walter Schwartz; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Qualitative age interactions in breast cancer studies: mind the gap.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Ismail Jatoi; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Breast cancer trends among young women in the United States.

Authors:  Robert E Tarone
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. II: Age-period-cohort models.

Authors:  D Clayton; E Schifflers
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Transient increase in the risk of breast cancer after giving birth.

Authors:  M Lambe; C Hsieh; D Trichopoulos; A Ekbom; M Pavia; H O Adami
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Breast cancer incidence, 1980-2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Andrew G Glass; James V Lacey; J Daniel Carreon; Robert N Hoover
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group--DBCG: History, organization, and status of scientific achievements at 30-year anniversary.

Authors:  Mogens Blichert-Toft; Peer Christiansen; Henning T Mouridsen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  Estrogen Receptor analyses in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. History, methods, prognosis and clinical implications.

Authors:  Maj-Lis M Talman; Birgitte B Rasmussen; Jørn Andersen; Ib J Christensen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

10.  Age-related crossover in breast cancer incidence rates between black and white ethnic groups.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Idan Menashe; Aya Mitani; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  14 in total

1.  Estrogen Receptor Status and the Future Burden of Invasive and In Situ Breast Cancers in the United States.

Authors:  Philip S Rosenberg; Kimberly A Barker; William F Anderson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  A web tool for age-period-cohort analysis of cancer incidence and mortality rates.

Authors:  Philip S Rosenberg; David P Check; William F Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  How many etiological subtypes of breast cancer: two, three, four, or more?

Authors:  William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Aleix Prat; Charles M Perou; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Age-Specific Indicators of a Healthy Lifestyle and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen M McClain; Lauren E McCullough; Patrick T Bradshaw; Sumitra Shantakumar; Mary Beth Terry; Alfred I Neugut; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Improvements in US Breast Cancer Survival and Proportion Explained by Tumor Size and Estrogen-Receptor Status.

Authors:  Ju-Hyun Park; William F Anderson; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Divergent oestrogen receptor-specific breast cancer trends in Ireland (2004-2013): Amassing data from independent Western populations provide etiologic clues.

Authors:  Maeve Mullooly; Jeanne Murphy; Gretchen L Gierach; Paul M Walsh; Sandra Deady; Thomas I Barron; Mark E Sherman; Philip S Rosenberg; William F Anderson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 7.  Basic Findings Regarding Breast Cancer in Korea in 2015: Data from a Breast Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Sang Yull Kang; Yoo Seok Kim; Zisun Kim; Hyun-Yul Kim; Se Kyung Lee; Kyu-Won Jung; Hyun Jo Youn
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.588

8.  Exploring the effects of lifestyle on breast cancer risk, age at diagnosis, and survival: the EBBA-Life study.

Authors:  Trygve Lofterød; Hanne Frydenberg; Vidar Flote; Anne Elise Eggen; Anne McTiernan; Elin S Mortensen; Lars A Akslen; Jon B Reitan; Tom Wilsgaard; Inger Thune
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Divergent breast cancer incidence trends by hormone receptor status in the state of Sarawak, Malaysia.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Beena C R Devi; Tieng S Tang; Philip S Rosenberg; William F Anderson; Xiaohong R Yang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 7.316

10.  Breast cancer risk and protracted low-to-moderate dose occupational radiation exposure in the US Radiologic Technologists Cohort, 1983-2008.

Authors:  D L Preston; C M Kitahara; D M Freedman; A J Sigurdson; S L Simon; M P Little; E K Cahoon; P Rajaraman; J S Miller; B H Alexander; M M Doody; M S Linet
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.