Literature DB >> 19755043

NCCN Task Force Report: Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry.

D Craig Allred, Robert W Carlson, Donald A Berry, Harold J Burstein, Stephen B Edge, Lori J Goldstein, Allen Gown, M Elizabeth Hammond, James Dirk Iglehart, Susan Moench, Lori J Pierce, Peter Ravdin, Stuart J Schnitt, Antonio C Wolff.   

Abstract

The NCCN Task Force on Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry was convened to critically evaluate the extent to which the presence of the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) biomarkers in breast cancer serve as prognostic and predictive factors in the adjuvant and metastatic settings, and the ability of immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of ER and PgR to provide an accurate assessment of the expression of these biomarkers in breast cancer tumor tissue. The task force is a multidisciplinary panel of 13 experts in breast cancer who are affiliated with NCCN member institutions and represent the disciplines of pathology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, and biostatistics. The main overall conclusions of the task force are ER is a strong predictor of response to endocrine therapy; ER status of all samples of invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) should be evaluated by IHC; IHC measurements of PgR, although not as important clinically as ER, can provide useful information and should also be performed on all samples of invasive breast cancer or DCIS; IHC is the main testing strategy for evaluating ER and PgR in breast cancer and priority should be given to improve the quality of IHC testing methodologies; all laboratories performing IHC assays of ER and PgR should undertake formal validation studies to show both technical and clinical validation of the assay in use; and all laboratories performing IHC assays of hormone receptors in breast cancer should follow additional quality control and assurance measures as outlined in the upcoming guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19755043     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2009.0079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  42 in total

1.  Metastatic breast cancer, version 1.2012: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines.

Authors:  Robert W Carlson; D Craig Allred; Benjamin O Anderson; Harold J Burstein; Stephen B Edge; William B Farrar; Andres Forero; Sharon Hermes Giordano; Lori J Goldstein; William J Gradishar; Daniel F Hayes; Clifford A Hudis; Steven Jay Isakoff; Britt-Marie E Ljung; David A Mankoff; P Kelly Marcom; Ingrid A Mayer; Beryl McCormick; Lori J Pierce; Elizabeth C Reed; Mary Lou Smith; Hatem Soliman; George Somlo; Richard L Theriault; John H Ward; Antonio C Wolff; Richard Zellars; Rashmi Kumar; Dorothy A Shead
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  MCM2: An alternative to Ki-67 for measuring breast cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Einas M Yousef; Daniela Furrer; David L Laperriere; Muhammad R Tahir; Sylvie Mader; Caroline Diorio; Louis A Gaboury
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Which threshold for ER positivity? a retrospective study based on 9639 patients.

Authors:  M Yi; L Huo; K B Koenig; E A Mittendorf; F Meric-Bernstam; H M Kuerer; I Bedrosian; A U Buzdar; W F Symmans; J R Crow; M Bender; R R Shah; G N Hortobagyi; K K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Indicator measures er/pr and her2 testing among women with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  C Sandoval; R Rahal; T Forte; J Klein-Geltink; D He; H Bryant
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Developing precision medicine in a global world.

Authors:  Eric H Rubin; Jeffrey D Allen; Jan A Nowak; Susan E Bates
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  ESR1 gene status correlates with estrogen receptor protein levels measured by ligand binding assay and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm; Ann Knoop; Bent Ejlertsen; Tine Rudbeck; Maj-Britt Jensen; Sven Müller; Anne Elisabeth Lykkesfeldt; Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen; Kirsten Vang Nielsen
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Adjuvant tamoxifen reduces subsequent breast cancer in women with estrogen receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ: a study based on NSABP protocol B-24.

Authors:  D Craig Allred; Stewart J Anderson; Soonmyung Paik; D Lawrence Wickerham; Iris D Nagtegaal; Sandra M Swain; Elefetherios P Mamounas; Thomas B Julian; Charles E Geyer; Joseph P Costantino; Stephanie R Land; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Clinical potential of mass spectrometry-based proteogenomics.

Authors:  Bing Zhang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Geoffrey S Baird; Karin D Rodland; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Evaluation of three commercial progesterone receptor assays in a single tamoxifen-treated breast cancer cohort.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Kornaga; Alexander C Klimowicz; Natalia Guggisberg; Travis Ogilvie; Don G Morris; Marc Webster; Anthony M Magliocco
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  ImmunoRatio: a publicly available web application for quantitative image analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki-67.

Authors:  Vilppu J Tuominen; Sanna Ruotoistenmäki; Arttu Viitanen; Mervi Jumppanen; Jorma Isola
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.