Literature DB >> 729243

Some anatomical and mechanical considerations relevant to the surface replacement of the femoral head.

M A Freeman.   

Abstract

The internal structure of the arthrosic and normal femoral heads are grossly different although both are roughly circular. In particular bone is destroyed or defective superolaterally in the former. The compressive strength of the femoral head depends upon the medial trabecular system which runs through the head at approximately 20 degrees to the vertical i.e. the plane of the resultant of the major loads borne by the hip. Ideally a femoral resurfacing prosthesis should be placed in this axis. The bone of the arthrosic femoral head can be sustained by blood reaching it within the neck. Thus vessels on the intracapsular surface of the neck need not be preserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 729243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  19 in total

1.  Does surgical approach influence component positioning with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing?

Authors:  G J C Myers; D Morgan; C W McBryde; K O'Dwyer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The influence of surgical approach on outcome in Birmingham hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Callum W McBryde; Matthew P Revell; Andrew M Thomas; Ronan B Treacy; Paul B Pynsent
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Role of the extraosseus blood supply in osteoarthritic femoral heads?

Authors:  Ralf Schoeniger; Norman Espinosa; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Blood flow to the femoral head and hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

Authors:  P E Beaulé; R Ganz; M Leunig
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Neck narrowing in resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a vascular insult?

Authors:  S A Brennan; F Khan; J McQuillan; C J O'Neill; P Kenny; S K O'Rourke; J M O'Byrne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Radiological validation of a fluoroscopic guided technique for femoral implant positioning during hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Philippe Chiron; Régis Pailhé; Nicolas Reina; David Ancelin; Akash Sharma; Laurent Maubisson; Jean-Michel Laffosse
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  [Results of 5 to 10-year follow-up after hip resurfacing. A systematic analysis of the literature on long-term results].

Authors:  M C M Klotz; S J Breusch; M Hassenpflug; R G Bitsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  The First SICOT Oral Presentation Award 2011: imageless computer-assisted femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Maik Stiehler; Jens Goronzy; Albrecht Hartmann; Frank Krummenauer; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Whole-mount specimens in the analysis of en bloc samples obtained from revisions of resurfacing hip implants. A report of 4 early failures.

Authors:  Ioannis Stogiannidis; Timo Puolakka; Jorma Pajamäki; Teemu Moilanen; Yrjö T Konttinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Are component positioning and prosthesis size associated with hip resurfacing failure?

Authors:  David R Marker; Michael G Zywiel; Aaron J Johnson; Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.