Literature DB >> 22618690

Host response to xenograft ECM implantation is not different between the shoulder and body wall sites in the rat model.

Diane R Leigh1, Mena Mesiha, Andrew R Baker, Esteban Walker, Kathleen A Derwin.   

Abstract

In the context of tendon and ligament repair, mechanical loading and the presence of joint synovial fluid are known to profoundly influence the form and function of the repair tissue and potentially the host response to biomaterials. Previously, we demonstrated that a xenograft extra cellular matrix (ECM) scaffold implanted in the rat shoulder elicited a unique host response from that seen in the body wall. However, the host response to xenografts implanted in shoulders with a tendon/capsule injury was not different from xenografts implanted in shoulders with no injury. In the current study, we hypothesized that varying clinically relevant surgical and environmental factors would introduce significant differences in host response to xenograft implantation at the shoulder. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found no significant differences in host response between any shoulder implantation conditions or between shoulder and body wall implantation in the rat model. These findings suggest that there is no advantage to using an orthotopic shoulder model to investigate the host response to rotator cuff scaffold materials in the rat model, and due to the insensitivity of its host response to various clinically relevant surgical conditions, may suggest that the rat does not provide a surrogate for directly translating the host response to biomaterials to the human application.
Copyright © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22618690      PMCID: PMC3434278          DOI: 10.1002/jor.22149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  32 in total

1.  Tissue-engineered rotator cuff tendon using porcine small intestine submucosa. Histologic and mechanical evaluation in dogs.

Authors:  L M Dejardin; S P Arnoczky; B J Ewers; R C Haut; R B Clarke
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  New experimental approach to study host tissue response to surgical mesh materials in vivo.

Authors:  M W Laschke; J M Häufel; H Thorlacius; M D Menger
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study.

Authors:  Jolene E Valentin; John S Badylak; George P McCabe; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Xenogeneic extracellular matrix grafts elicit a TH2-restricted immune response.

Authors:  A J Allman; T B McPherson; S F Badylak; L C Merrill; B Kallakury; C Sheehan; R H Raeder; D W Metzger
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Expression of osteoprotegerin, receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (osteoprotegerin ligand) and related proinflammatory cytokines during fracture healing.

Authors:  T Kon; T J Cho; T Aizawa; M Yamazaki; N Nooh; D Graves; L C Gerstenfeld; T A Einhorn
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Mohit Kapoor; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Daniel Lajeunesse; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Hassan Fahmi
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 20.543

8.  Concurrent delivery of dexamethasone and VEGF for localized inflammation control and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Siddhesh D Patil; Fotios Papadmitrakopoulos; Diane J Burgess
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  A preliminary study on the effects of acellular tissue graft augmentation in acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Authors:  Daniel K Lee
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 1.286

Review 10.  Modulation of the inflammatory response for enhanced bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Paschalia M Mountziaris; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.389

View more
  5 in total

1.  Magnetically Responsive Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Smooth Muscle Cells Maintain Their Benefits to Augmenting Elastic Matrix Neoassembly.

Authors:  Ganesh Swaminathan; Balakrishnan Sivaraman; Lee Moore; Maciej Zborowski; Anand Ramamurthi
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  Composition of intraperitoneally implanted electrospun conduits modulates cellular elastic matrix generation.

Authors:  Chris A Bashur; Anand Ramamurthi
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Current Status of Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Abby Chainani; Dianne Little
Journal:  Tech Orthop       Date:  2016-06

4.  Tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6 (TSG-6) amplifies hyaluronan synthesis by airway smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  Mark E Lauer; Georgiana Cheng; Shadi Swaidani; Mark A Aronica; Paul H Weigel; Vincent C Hascall
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Evaluation of patches for rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies.

Authors:  Jinwei Yang; Yuhao Kang; Wanlu Zhao; Jia Jiang; Yanbiao Jiang; Bing Zhao; Mingyue Jiao; Bo Yuan; Jinzhong Zhao; Bin Ma
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-08-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.