Literature DB >> 18156058

A preliminary study on the effects of acellular tissue graft augmentation in acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Daniel K Lee1.   

Abstract

Acute Achilles tendon rupture injuries present surgical challenges because of the mechanical forces placed on this tendon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an acellular human dermal tissue matrix, GraftJacket Matrix (Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Arlington, TN), as an augmentation material in acute Achilles tendon repair. Eleven consecutive patients with acute tendon ruptures were evaluated and followed up (20-31 months). Primary repair was followed by augmentation with the graft sutured circumferentially around the tendon. Patients were placed in an early functional rehabilitation program with postoperative evaluation at 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcome scores were calculated based on the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scoring system. At 20-month postoperative follow-up, there have been no cases of rerupture or recurrent pain. The average return-to-activity time was 11.8 +/- 0.75 weeks. These retrospective clinical results suggest that with an acellular human dermal tissue matrix to augment acute Achilles tendon, primary repair offers a desirable return-to-activity time without any rerupture or complications. ACFAS Level of Clinical Evidence: 2c.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18156058     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2007.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  22 in total

1.  Recent Scientific Advances Towards the Development of Tendon Healing Strategies.

Authors:  Eli T Sayegh; John D Sandy; Mandeep S Virk; Anthony A Romeo; Robert W Wysocki; Jorge O Galante; Katie J Trella; Anna Plaas; Vincent M Wang
Journal:  Curr Tissue Eng       Date:  2015

2.  Treatment of severe burn with DermACELL(®), an acellular dermal matrix.

Authors:  Shyi-Gen Chen; Yuan-Sheng Tzeng; Chih-Hsin Wang
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2012-09-15

3.  Host response to xenograft ECM implantation is not different between the shoulder and body wall sites in the rat model.

Authors:  Diane R Leigh; Mena Mesiha; Andrew R Baker; Esteban Walker; Kathleen A Derwin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Incorporation of the Amniotic Membrane as an Immunomodulatory Design Element in Collagen Scaffolds for Tendon Repair.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hortensius; Jill H Ebens; Marley J Dewey; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2018-10-19

5.  Biomechanical properties of Achilles tendon repair augmented with a bioadhesive-coated scaffold.

Authors:  Michael Brodie; Laura Vollenweider; John L Murphy; Fangmin Xu; Arinne Lyman; William D Lew; Bruce P Lee
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.715

6.  Hybrid carbon-based scaffolds for applications in soft tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Jarema S Czarnecki; Khalid Lafdi; Robert M Joseph; Panagiotis A Tsonis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  Scaffolds for tendon and ligament repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Anthony Ratcliffe; David L Butler; Nathaniel A Dyment; Paul J Cagle; Christopher S Proctor; Seena S Ratcliffe; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Biologics in Achilles tendon healing and repair: a review.

Authors:  Evan Shapiro; Daniel Grande; Mark Drakos
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

9.  Nonlinear and anisotropic tensile properties of graft materials used in soft tissue applications.

Authors:  Jonathon H Yoder; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Failed synthetic graft after acute Achilles tendon repair.

Authors:  Asmaa Mohamed; Francesco Oliva; Stefano Nardoni; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.