Literature DB >> 25488186

Neural substrates underlying stimulation-enhanced motor skill learning after stroke.

Stéphanie Lefebvre1, Laurence Dricot2, Patrice Laloux1, Wojciech Gradkowski3, Philippe Desfontaines4, Frédéric Evrard5, André Peeters6, Jacques Jamart7, Yves Vandermeeren8.   

Abstract

Motor skill learning is one of the key components of motor function recovery after stroke, especially recovery driven by neurorehabilitation. Transcranial direct current stimulation can enhance neurorehabilitation and motor skill learning in stroke patients. However, the neural mechanisms underlying the retention of stimulation-enhanced motor skill learning involving a paretic upper limb have not been resolved. These neural substrates were explored by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nineteen chronic hemiparetic stroke patients participated in a double-blind, cross-over randomized, sham-controlled experiment with two series. Each series consisted of two sessions: (i) an intervention session during which dual transcranial direct current stimulation or sham was applied during motor skill learning with the paretic upper limb; and (ii) an imaging session 1 week later, during which the patients performed the learned motor skill. The motor skill learning task, called the 'circuit game', involves a speed/accuracy trade-off and consists of moving a pointer controlled by a computer mouse along a complex circuit as quickly and accurately as possible. Relative to the sham series, dual transcranial direct current stimulation applied bilaterally over the primary motor cortex during motor skill learning with the paretic upper limb resulted in (i) enhanced online motor skill learning; (ii) enhanced 1-week retention; and (iii) superior transfer of performance improvement to an untrained task. The 1-week retention's enhancement driven by the intervention was associated with a trend towards normalization of the brain activation pattern during performance of the learned motor skill relative to the sham series. A similar trend towards normalization relative to sham was observed during performance of a simple, untrained task without a speed/accuracy constraint, despite a lack of behavioural difference between the dual transcranial direct current stimulation and sham series. Finally, dual transcranial direct current stimulation applied during the first session enhanced continued learning with the paretic limb 1 week later, relative to the sham series. This lasting behavioural enhancement was associated with more efficient recruitment of the motor skill learning network, that is, focused activation on the motor-premotor areas in the damaged hemisphere, especially on the dorsal premotor cortex. Dual transcranial direct current stimulation applied during motor skill learning with a paretic upper limb resulted in prolonged shaping of brain activation, which supported behavioural enhancements in stroke patients.
© The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fMRI; motor skill learning; neurorehabilitation; stroke; tDCS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25488186      PMCID: PMC4441084          DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  48 in total

1.  Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Implicit sequence-specific motor learning after subcortical stroke is associated with increased prefrontal brain activations: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Sean K Meehan; Bubblepreet Randhawa; Brenda Wessel; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Motor learning in man: a review of functional and clinical studies.

Authors:  Ulrike Halsband; Regine K Lange
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2006-05-26

4.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reliability and validity of estimating the NIH stroke scale score from medical records.

Authors:  S E Kasner; J A Chalela; J M Luciano; B L Cucchiara; E C Raps; M L McGarvey; M B Conroy; A R Localio
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Continuous theta burst stimulation over the contralesional sensory and motor cortex enhances motor learning post-stroke.

Authors:  Sean K Meehan; Elizabeth Dao; Meghan A Linsdell; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-induced behavioural gains in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Charlotte Jane Stagg; Velicia Bachtiar; Jacinta O'Shea; Claire Allman; Rosemary Ann Bosnell; Udo Kischka; Paul McMahan Matthews; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  Non-invasive mapping of brain functions and brain recovery: applying lessons from cognitive neuroscience to neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  P M Matthews; H Johansen-Berg; H Reddy
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 9.  A quantitative meta-analysis and review of motor learning in the human brain.

Authors:  Robert M Hardwick; Claudia Rottschy; R Chris Miall; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke.

Authors:  Jacinta O'Shea; Marie-Hélène Boudrias; Charlotte Jane Stagg; Velicia Bachtiar; Udo Kischka; Jakob Udby Blicher; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  31 in total

1.  Behavioural and neurofunctional impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on somatosensory learning.

Authors:  Raphael Hilgenstock; Thomas Weiss; Ralph Huonker; Otto W Witte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on neural processing in post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Robert Darkow; Andrew Martin; Anna Würtz; Agnes Flöel; Marcus Meinzer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Post-stroke remodeling processes in animal models and humans.

Authors:  Carla Cirillo; Nabila Brihmat; Evelyne Castel-Lacanal; Alice Le Friec; Marianne Barbieux-Guillot; Nicolas Raposo; Jérémie Pariente; Alain Viguier; Marion Simonetta-Moreau; Jean-François Albucher; Jean-Marc Olivot; Franck Desmoulin; Philippe Marque; François Chollet; Isabelle Loubinoux
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 4.  Rehabilitation and the Neural Network After Stroke.

Authors:  Norihito Shimamura; Takeshi Katagai; Kiyohide Kakuta; Naoya Matsuda; Kosuke Katayama; Nozomi Fujiwara; Yuuka Watanabe; Masato Naraoka; Hiroki Ohkuma
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  Retrospective Analysis of Task-Specific Effects on Brain Activity After Stroke: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marika Demers; Rini Varghese; Carolee Winstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.473

6.  PsychotherapyPlus: augmentation of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in major depressive disorder-study design and methodology of a multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Malek Bajbouj; Sabine Aust; Jan Spies; Ana-Lucia Herrera-Melendez; Sarah V Mayer; Maike Peters; Christian Plewnia; Andreas J Fallgatter; Lukas Frase; Claus Normann; Nora Behler; Linda Wulf; Eva-Lotta Brakemeier; Frank Padberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 7.  [Transcranial direct current stimulation for depressive disorders].

Authors:  S Aust; U Palm; F Padberg; M Bajbouj
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Electrode Montages May Differentially Impact Variables of Walking Performance in Individuals Poststroke: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Bryant A Seamon; Mark G Bowden; John H Kindred; Aaron E Embry; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.590

Review 9.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke.

Authors:  Bernhard Elsner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Jan Mehrholz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-21

Review 10.  Study Paradigms and Principles Investigated in Motor Learning Research After Stroke: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sarah Gregor; Tyler M Saumur; Lucas D Crosby; Jessica Powers; Kara K Patterson
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2021-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.