PURPOSE: To determine the usefulness of abdominal compression in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) depending on lobe tumor location. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven non-small cell lung cancer patients were immobilized in the Stereotactic Body Frame™ (Elekta). Eighteen tumors were located in an upper lobe, one in the middle lobe and nine in a lower lobe (one patient had two lesions). All patients underwent two four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans, with and without abdominal compression. Three-dimensional tumor motion amplitude was determined using manual landmark annotation. We also determined the internal target volume (ITV) and the influence of abdominal compression on lung dose-volume histograms. RESULTS: The mean reduction of tumor motion amplitude was 3.5 mm (p = 0.009) for lower lobe tumors and 0.8 mm (p = 0.026) for upper/middle lobe locations. Compression increased tumor motion in 5 cases. Mean ITV reduction was 3.6 cm(3) (p = 0.039) for lower lobe and 0.2 cm(3) (p = 0.048) for upper/middle lobe lesions. Dosimetric gain of the compression for lung sparing was not clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: The most significant impact of abdominal compression was obtained in patients with lower lobe tumors. However, minor or negative effects of compression were reported for other patients and lung sparing was not substantially improved. At our institute, patients with upper or middle lobe lesions are now systematically treated without compression and the usefulness of compression for lower lobe tumors is evaluated on an individual basis.
PURPOSE: To determine the usefulness of abdominal compression in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) depending on lobe tumor location. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven non-small cell lung cancerpatients were immobilized in the Stereotactic Body Frame™ (Elekta). Eighteen tumors were located in an upper lobe, one in the middle lobe and nine in a lower lobe (one patient had two lesions). All patients underwent two four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans, with and without abdominal compression. Three-dimensional tumor motion amplitude was determined using manual landmark annotation. We also determined the internal target volume (ITV) and the influence of abdominal compression on lung dose-volume histograms. RESULTS: The mean reduction of tumor motion amplitude was 3.5 mm (p = 0.009) for lower lobe tumors and 0.8 mm (p = 0.026) for upper/middle lobe locations. Compression increased tumor motion in 5 cases. Mean ITV reduction was 3.6 cm(3) (p = 0.039) for lower lobe and 0.2 cm(3) (p = 0.048) for upper/middle lobe lesions. Dosimetric gain of the compression for lung sparing was not clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: The most significant impact of abdominal compression was obtained in patients with lower lobe tumors. However, minor or negative effects of compression were reported for other patients and lung sparing was not substantially improved. At our institute, patients with upper or middle lobe lesions are now systematically treated without compression and the usefulness of compression for lower lobe tumors is evaluated on an individual basis.
Authors: Vikren Sarkar; Long Huang; Yu-Huei Jessica Huang; Martin W Szegedi; Prema Rassiah-Szegedi; Hui Zhao; Ying J Hitchcock; Kristine E Kokeny; Brian Wang; Bill J Salter Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2016
Authors: Percy Lee; Billy W Loo; Tithi Biswas; George X Ding; Issam M El Naqa; Andrew Jackson; Feng-Ming Kong; Tamara LaCouture; Moyed Miften; Timothy Solberg; Wolfgang A Tome; An Tai; Ellen Yorke; X Allen Li Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 8.013