Literature DB >> 26393283

Are pitch and roll compensations required in all pathologies? A data analysis of 2945 fractions.

Pietro Mancosu1, Giacomo Reggiori1, Anna Gaudino1, Francesca Lobefalo1, Lucia Paganini1, Valentina Palumbo1, Antonella Stravato1, Stefano Tomatis1, Marta Scorsetti2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: New linear accelerators can be equipped with a 6D robotic couch, providing two additional rotational motion axes: pitch and roll. These shifts in kilo voltage-cone beam CT (kV-CBCT) image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) were evaluated over the first 6 months of usage of a 6D robotic couch-top, ranking the treatment sites for which the two compensations are larger for patient set-up.
METHODS: The couch compensations of 2945 fractions for 376 consecutive patients treated on the PerfectPitch™ 6D couch (Varian(®) Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were analysed. Among these patients, 169 were treated for brain, 111 for lung, 54 for liver, 26 for pancreas and 16 for prostate tumours. During the set-up, patient anatomy from planning CT was aligned to kV-CBCT, and 6D movements were executed. Information related to pitch and roll were extracted by proper querying of the Microsoft(®) SQL server (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) ARIA database (Varian Medical Systems). Mean values and standard deviations were calculated for all sites. Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test was performed.
RESULTS: Considering all the data, mean pitch and roll adjustments were -0.10° ± 0.92° and 0.12° ± 0.96°, respectively; mean absolute values for both adjustments were 0.58° ± 0.69° and 0.69° ± 0.72°, respectively. Brain treatments showed the highest mean absolute values for pitch and roll rotations (0.73° ± 0.69° and 0.80° ± 0.78°, respectively); the lowest values of 0.36° ± 0.47° and 0.49° ± 0.58° were found for pancreas. KS test was significant for brain vs liver, pancreas and prostate. Collective corrections (pitch + roll) >0.5°, >1.0° and >2.0° were observed in, respectively, 79.8%, 61.0% and 29.1% for brain and 56.7%, 39.4% and 6.7% for pancreas.
CONCLUSION: Adjustments in all six dimensions, including unconventional pitch and roll rotations, improve the patient set-up in all treatment sites. The greatest improvement was observed for patients with brain tumours. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic evaluation of the clinical efficacy of a 6D Robotic couch-top in CBCT IGRT over different tumour regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26393283      PMCID: PMC4743463          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  15 in total

1.  An analysis of patient positioning during stereotactic lung radiotherapy performed without rigid external immobilization.

Authors:  Max Dahele; Wilko Verbakel; Johan Cuijpers; Ben Slotman; Suresh Senan
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy utilizing cone-beam CT image-guidance with a robotic couch: intrafraction motion analysis accounting for all six degrees of freedom.

Authors:  Derek Hyde; Fiona Lochray; Renee Korol; Melanie Davidson; C Shun Wong; Lijun Ma; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Residual rotational set-up errors after daily cone-beam CT image guided radiotherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Louise Vagner Laursen; Ulrik Vindelev Elstrøm; Anne Vestergaard; Ludvig P Muren; Jørgen Baltzer Petersen; Jacob Christian Lindegaard; Cai Grau; Kari Tanderup
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Clinical evaluation of a robotic 6-degree of freedom treatment couch for frameless radiosurgery.

Authors:  Thierry Gevaert; Dirk Verellen; Benedikt Engels; Tom Depuydt; Karina Heuninckx; Koen Tournel; Michael Duchateau; Truus Reynders; Mark De Ridder
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Is abdominal compression useful in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy? A 4DCT and dosimetric lobe-dependent study.

Authors:  Gauthier Bouilhol; Myriam Ayadi; Simon Rit; Sheeba Thengumpallil; Joël Schaerer; Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Line Claude; David Sarrut
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Implementation and validation of a new fixation system for stereotactic radiation therapy: An analysis of patient immobilization.

Authors:  Stephanie Lang; Claudia Linsenmeier; Michelle L Brown; Frederique Cavelaars; Alessandra Tini; Christopher Winter; Jerome Krayenbuehl
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-07-22

7.  Reduction of respiratory liver tumor motion by abdominal compression in stereotactic body frame, analyzed by tracking fiducial markers implanted in liver.

Authors:  Wouter Wunderink; Alejandra Méndez Romero; Willy de Kruijf; Hans de Boer; Peter Levendag; Ben Heijmen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Six degrees of freedom CBCT-based positioning for intracranial targets treated with frameless stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Anees Dhabaan; Eduard Schreibmann; Arsalan Siddiqi; Eric Elder; Tim Fox; Tomi Ogunleye; Natia Esiashvili; Walter Curran; Ian Crocker; Hui-Kuo Shu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A novel compound 6D-offset simulating phantom and quality assurance program for stereotactic image-guided radiation therapy system.

Authors:  Dennis Yuen Kan Ngar; Michael Lok-Man Cheung; Michael Koon-Ming Kam; Wai-Sang Poon; Anthony Tak-Cheung Chan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Dosimetric effects of manual cone-beam CT (CBCT) matching for spinal radiosurgery: our experience.

Authors:  Eduard Schreibmann; Tim Fox; Ian Crocker
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.243

View more
  4 in total

1.  Optimization based trajectory planning for real-time 6DoF robotic patient motion compensation systems.

Authors:  Xinmin Liu; Rodney D Wiersma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A Probability-Based Investigation on the Setup Robustness of Pencil-beam Proton Radiation Therapy for Skull-Base Meningioma.

Authors:  Wei Zou; Goldie Kurtz; Mayisha Nakib; Brendan Burgdorf; Murat Alp; Taoran Li; Robert Lustig; Ying Xiao; Lei Dong; Alireza Kassaee; Michelle Alonso-Basanta
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-01-28

3.  Is Halcyon feasible for single thoracic or lumbar vertebral segment SBRT?

Authors:  Fang Li; Jeonghoon Park; Ron Lalonde; Si Young Jang; Maria Stefania diMayorca; John C Flickinger; Andrew Keller; Mohammed Saiful Huq
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Geometric accuracy evaluation of a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) couch with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using a phantom and correlation study of the position errors in pelvic tumor radiotherapy.

Authors:  Caofei Fu; Changsheng Ma; Dongping Shang; Qingtao Qiu; Huipeng Meng; Jinghao Duan; Yong Yin
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.