Literature DB >> 22617127

KRAS mutations in primary tumours and post-FOLFOX metastatic lesions in cases of colorectal cancer.

Y Kawamoto1, K Tsuchihara, T Yoshino, N Ogasawara, M Kojima, M Takahashi, A Ochiai, H Bando, N Fuse, M Tahara, T Doi, H Esumi, Y Komatsu, A Ohtsu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations are predictive markers for the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibody therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Although the mutational status of KRAS is reportedly highly concordant between primary and metastatic lesions, it is not yet clear whether genotoxic chemotherapies might induce additional mutations.
METHODS: A total of 63 lesions (23 baseline primary, 18 metastatic and 24 post-treatment metastatic) from 21 patients who were treated with FOLFOX as adjuvant therapy for stage III/IV colorectal cancer following curative resection were examined. The DNA samples were obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens, and KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were evaluated.
RESULTS: The numbers of primary lesions with wild-type and mutant KRAS codons 12 and 13 were 8 and 13, respectively. The mutational status of KRAS remained concordant between the primary tumours and the post-FOLFOX metastatic lesions, irrespective of patient background, treatment duration and disease-free survival. Furthermore, the mutational statuses of the other genes evaluated were also concordant between the primary and metastatic lesions.
CONCLUSION: Because the mutational statuses of predictive biomarker genes were not altered by FOLFOX therapy, specimens from both primary tumours and post-FOLFOX tumour metastases might serve as valid sources of DNA for known genomic biomarker testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22617127      PMCID: PMC3394966          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


KRAS mutations are predictive markers for the poor efficacy of anti-EGFR antibody therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (Lievre ; Benvenuti ; Di Fiore ; Frattini ; Khambata-Ford ; Amado ; De Roock ; Freeman ; Karapetis ; Lievre ). Point mutations in the KRAS gene occur early in the progression from colorectal adenoma to carcinoma and are detected in 35–40% of patients, regardless of their Dukes stage (Andreyev ). More than 90% of the KRAS mutations in these patients have been detected in codons 12 (GGT) and 13 (GGC) (Oliveira ). Activating mutations at codons 61 and 146 have also been reported in a small number of these tumours. In addition, mutations in the molecules involved in signalling pathways downstream of EGFR, such as NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA, have also been reported in colorectal cancers. These mutations have been suggested to modify the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibody therapies, although their predictive value has not yet been established (De Roock ). Oxaliplatin [trans-R,R-1,2-diaminocyclohexaneoxalatoplatinum (II), L-OHP] is a third-generation platinum (Pt)-containing anti-tumour compound. It is frequently administered as a component of FOLFOX therapy in combination with 5-FU for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Oxaliplatin induces DNA damage associated with intra- and inter-strand cross-links (Pt-GG adducts) and can induce gene mutations (Woynarowski ; Hah ; Sharma ). The mutagenic activity of oxaliplatin has been demonstrated in cultured cells (Silva ). The KRAS mutation status of primary and metastatic lesions is reportedly highly concordant (Oudejans ; Losi ; Suchy ; Zauber ; Weber ; Etienne-Grimaldi ; Santini ; Garm Spindler ; Loupakis ; Perrone ; Baldus ; Italiano ; Knijn ). However, whether long-term treatment with genotoxic chemotherapies, such as oxaliplatin, can induce additional mutations in metachronous metastatic lesions has not yet been well examined. Assuming that FOLFOX therapy has the potential to alter the biomarker mutation profile, it is important to determine whether the primary or relapsed tumour represents the more appropriate source of DNA for testing. We examined the mutation status of KRAS and other biomarker genes in primary and synchronous/metachronous metastatic lesions in patients with stage III/IV colorectal cancer treated with adjuvant FOLFOX therapy following curative resection.

Patients and methods

Patient selection

A total of 63 lesions from 21 patients who had received adjuvant FOLFOX therapy for stage III/IV colorectal cancer following curative resection at the National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan, between January 2006 and December 2009 were examined. All patients were treated with a modified FOLFOX6 regimen, with a reduced oxaliplatin dose of 85 mg m−2 administered every 14 days, and 12 cycles were planned as the full therapy course (Andre ; Allegra ). FOLFOX therapy was discontinued when tumour relapse was demonstrated by imaging or when intolerable adverse events occurred.

DNA samples and mutational analyses

The DNA samples were obtained from macroscopically dissected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens cut into 10-μm-thick sections. Genomic DNA was extracted using the EZ1 Advanced XL and EZ1 DNA Tissue Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bando ). Mutations in KRAS codons 12 and 13 were detected using the ARMS/Scorpions technology-based KRAS PCR Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Mutations in KRAS codons 61 and 146, NRAS codons 12, 13 and 61, BRAF codon 600 and PIK3CA codons 542, 545, 546 and 1047 were detected using the multiplex PCR-Luminex method-based MEBGEN Mutation Kit (Medical & Biological Laboratories, Nagoya, Japan). Mutations detected with the MEBGEN Mutation Kit were confirmed by direct sequencing. Mutations in PIK3CA codons 542, 545 and 546 were further confirmed using the ARMS/Scorpions technology-based PI3K Mutation Test Kit (Qiagen). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Center.

Results

Patient and tumour site characteristics

We reviewed 151 consecutive cases of stage III/IV colorectal cancer treated with an adjuvant FOLFOX therapy after curative resection. Among these cases, 21 patients developed metastatic tumours that were diagnosed during or after the FOLFOX therapy and surgically resected. The patient and tumour site characteristics are shown in Table 1. The primary tumour sites were the colon and rectum in 8 and 13 patients, respectively. The most abundant primary tumour histopathological type was differentiated adenocarcinoma. Well- and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas and mucinous adenocarcinomas were observed in 5, 14 and 2 patients, respectively. All metastatic tumours exhibited histology concordant with that of the associated primary colorectal adenocarcinoma.
Table 1

Characteristics

Patient characteristics Number
Sex (female/male)8/13
Median age (range)64 (36–75) years
  
Primary tumour site
 Colon8
 Rectum13
  
Histopathological type of primary site
 Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma5
 Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma14
 Mucinous adenocarcinoma2
  
Stage before initial operation
 III12
 IV (synchronous metastases)9
  
Tumour site characteristics
Metastases
 Pre-FOLFOX18
  Synchronous12
  Metachronous6
 Post-FOLFOX24
  
Sites of metastases
 Pre-FOLFOX 
  Liver11
  Lung5
  Local recurrence1
  Subcutaneous1
 Post-FOLFOX  
  Liver6
  Lung14
  Local recurrence3
  Lymph node1
In all, 12 patients had stage III disease, whereas the remaining 9 patients had synchronous metastatic lesions and were diagnosed as stage IV at the initial operation. There were 12 synchronous metastatic lesions in the patients with stage IV disease. In addition, six metastatic lesions were detected in five patients with stage III disease at operation that were resected prior to the start of FOLFOX therapy. These 18 lesions were regarded as ‘pre-FOLFOX’ metastatic lesions. The pre-FOLFOX metastases were found in the liver (11 lesions), lung (5 lesions), as a local recurrence (1 lesion) and as a subcutaneous recurrence (1 lesion). Meanwhile, 24 metastatic lesions in the 21 patients were detected during or after FOLFOX therapy. These lesions were regarded as ‘post-FOLFOX’ metastatic lesions. The post-FOLFOX metastases were found in the liver, lung, as a local recurrence and lymph node in 6, 14, 3 and 1 patients, respectively. The median number of FOLFOX therapy cycles administered was 9 (3–12 cycles). Five patients experienced relapse during FOLFOX therapy (case 1, 2, 3, 7 and 12), whereas the remaining 16 patients experienced relapse after the end of FOLFOX therapy. The median disease-free survival, calculated from the time of the last operation until post-FOLFOX recurrence, was 409 days (97–1077). The median period from the start of FOLFOX therapy until recurrence was 373 days (35–1029). Relapses developed within 180 days after the end of FOLFOX therapy in 10 of the 21 patients (Table 2).
Table 2

FOLFOX treatment, metastasis status and tumour recurrence sites

Case Primary site Histopathological type Pre-FOLFOX metastatic site Synchronous/ metachronous FOLFOX cycles DFS (days) Days from end of FOFLOX until recurrence Post-FOLFOX recurrence site
1RectumMode31246Liver
2ColonModeLiverSynchronous497−16aLiver
3ColonModeLiverSynchronous411626Liver
4RectumWellLocal recurrenceMetachronous4469363Local recurrence
5RectumMode5827603Lung
6ColonMode5350244Lymph node
7RectumModeLiverSynchronous82141Lung
   LungSynchronous    
8RectumMuc8538318Lung
9ColonWell81077903Liver
10ColonModeLiverSynchronous8344120Lung
   LiverSynchronous   Lung
   LungSynchronous    
11ColonMucLungSynchronous9721401Lung
12RectumWellLiverSynchronous9109−88aLiver
13RectumModeLiverMetachronous11328120Liver
   LungMetachronous    
14RectumModeSubcutaneousMetachronous12519156Lung
15ColonMode12388176Local recurrence
16RectumModeLiverSynchronous12466210Lung
17RectumWellLungSynchronous12556264Lung
18ColonModeLiverMetachronous12531231Lung
        Lung
19RectumModeLiverSynchronous12409217Lung
20RectumMode12455243Local recurrence
21RectumWellLiverMetachronous1234671Lung
        Lung

Abbreviations: DFS=disease-free survival; mode=moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; muc=mucinous adenocarcinoma; well=well-differentiated adenocarcinoma.

The cases that FOLFOX therapies were administered after recurrence.

Mutational status of KRAS and other genes

The mutational statuses of KRAS and other genes in primary and metastatic lesions are shown in Table 3. Mutations in KRAS codons 12 and 13 were detected in 13 of the 21 primary colorectal tumours. Among the remaining eight tumours with wild-type KRAS codons 12 and 13, two tumours exhibited KRAS codon 146 mutations (A146V and A146T) and one tumour exhibited NRAS codon 61 mutation (Q61H). Two tumours exhibited mutations in PIK3CA codon 542 (E542K), one tumour exhibited a KRAS G12S mutation and one tumour had no mutations in any of the genes examined. No apparent mutations of KRAS codon 61, NRAS codon 12 or 13, BRAF codon 600, or PIK3CA codon 1047 were detected in any sample in this study.
Table 3

Mutational status of KRAS and other genes

Case Primary site Mutation status Pre-FOLFOX metastatic site Mutation status Post-FOLFOX recurrence site Mutation status
1RectumKRAS G12DLiverKRAS G12D
2ColonKRAS G12DLiverKRAS G12DLiverKRAS G12D
3ColonKRAS G12DLiverKRAS G12DLiverKRAS G12D
4RectumKRAS G12RLocal recurrenceKRAS G12RLocal recurrenceKRAS G12R
5RectumKRAS G12DLungKRAS G12D
6ColonWTLNWT
7RectumKRAS G12SLiverKRAS G12SLungKRAS G12S
   LungKRAS G12S  
8RectumWTLungWT
9ColonWTLiverWT
10ColonKRAS G12ALiverKRAS G12ALungKRAS G12A
   LiverKRAS G12ALungKRAS G12A
   LungWT  
11ColonKRAS G13DLungKRAS G13DLungKRAS G13D
12RectumKRAS A146VLiverKRAS A146VLiverKRAS A146V
13RectumKRAS G12VLiverKRAS G12VLiverKRAS G12V
   LungKRAS G12V  
14RectumKRAS G12DSubcutaneousKRAS G12DLungKRAS G12D
15ColonWTLocal recurrenceWT
16RectumKRAS G12S, PIK3CA E542KLiverKRAS G12S, PIK3CA E542KLungKRAS G12S, PIK3CA E542K
17RectumKRAS G12DLungKRAS G12DLungKRAS G12D
18ColonKRAS G12DLiverKRAS G12DLungKRAS G12D
     LungKRAS G12D
19RectumNRAS Q61HLiverNRAS Q61HLungNRAS Q61H
20RectumPIK3CA E542KLocal recurrencePIK3CA E542K
21RectumKRAS A146VLiverKRAS A146VLungKRAS A146V
     LungKRAS A146V

Abbreviations: LN= lymph node; WT= wild-type.

The degree of concordance of the gene mutations in primary and pre-FOLFOX metastatic lesions was examined. In case 10, a KRAS G12A mutation was detected in the primary lesion, whereas the metastatic lesion in the lung had wild-type KRAS. Although the histological features of the lung lesion were consistent with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon, no mutations in the metastatic lesion were detected, even after repeated high-sensitivity examinations. The remaining 17 metastatic lesions in 14 patients, including 2 liver metastatic lesions in case 10, showed the same mutational statuses as the primary tumours for all of the genes examined. Then, the mutational statuses of the post-FOLFOX metastatic lesions were examined. The mutational statuses of all genes examined were identical in the 21 primary tumours and the corresponding 24 post-FOLFOX metastatic lesions, regardless of the sites involved, duration of FOLFOX treatment or disease-free survival period.

Discussion

Previous studies have reported a high concordance rate of the KRAS mutations in primary and metastatic tumours (Oudejans ; Losi ; Suchy ; Zauber ; Weber ; Etienne-Grimaldi ; Santini ; Garm Spindler ; Loupakis ; Perrone ; Baldus ; Italiano ; Knijn ). However, in patients receiving long-term chemotherapy, the effects of genotoxic chemotherapies, such as oxaliplatin, have not been well investigated. In this study, we examined 21 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received adjuvant FOLFOX therapy. The recurrent tumours in three patients who showed relapse within 4 months after the primary surgery or during the first 3 or 4 cycles of adjuvant FOLFOX therapy (cases 1–3) were regarded as synchronous metastases arising from micrometastases that likely existed prior to the start of the adjuvant chemotherapy. The remaining 18 patients who developed relapses more than 8 months from the end of adjuvant FOLFOX therapy or after more than 6 cycles of adjuvant FOLFOX therapy were regarded as having metachronous metastatic tumours that had developed after exposure to oxaliplatin. Among these cases, tumour relapse occurred within 180 days after FOLFOX therapy in 7 patients and more than 180 days after FOLFOX therapy in the remaining 11 patients. Regardless of the treatment duration, 8 of the primary tumours with wild-type KRAS codons 12 and 13 did not acquire KRAS mutations. The remaining tumours with KRAS mutations also did not show additional mutations after FOLFOX therapy. Furthermore, none of the other genes that might potentially affect the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibody therapy were altered. KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations are all regarded as strong driver mutations that induce cell proliferation. These mutations might be acquired in the early stages of carcinogenesis and have generally been reported as mutually exclusive (Andreyev ). Consistent with this observation, the KRAS and NRAS mutations in this study were found to be mutually exclusive. In the rest of the tumours, other unidentified driver mutations or amplifications may have activated the signalling pathways promoting cell proliferation. Considering the exclusive nature of the tested mutations, the acquisition of additional driver mutations may not be advantageous to these tumour cells for clonal selection. This could be one explanation for why the mutational statuses of KRAS and other genes were not altered during the development of metastatic tumours. Our findings suggest that both the primary tumours and metastatic tumours arising during or after FOLFOX therapy could be valid sources of DNA for KRAS testing prior to treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies, although the number of cases in this study was limited. This finding should be further confirmed in a larger number of cases. Though collecting surgically resected metastatic tumour tissues is often difficult, circulating tumour cells may be a useful alternative DNA source for highly reliable and sensitive mutation detection systems such as the ARMS/Scorpion method for further analyses.
  33 in total

1.  Kirsten ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: the multicenter "RASCAL" study.

Authors:  H J Andreyev; A R Norman; D Cunningham; J R Oates; P A Clarke
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-06       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Comparative analysis of the mutagenic activity of oxaliplatin and cisplatin in the Hprt gene of CHO cells.

Authors:  Maria J Silva; Paula Costa; Anabela Dias; Marco Valente; Henriqueta Louro; Maria G Boavida
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Stability of K-ras mutations throughout the natural history of human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L Losi; J Benhattar; J Costa
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Allelotyping analyses of synchronous primary and metastasis CIN colon cancers identified different subtypes.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Weber; Nicolas Meyer; Erwan Pencreach; Anne Schneider; Eric Guérin; Agnès Neuville; Christine Stemmer; Cécile Brigand; Philippe Bachellier; Serge Rohr; Michèle Kedinger; Christian Meyer; Dominique Guenot; Pierre Oudet; Daniel Jaeck; Marie-Pierre Gaub
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Astrid Lièvre; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Delphine Le Corre; Valérie Boige; Bruno Landi; Jean-François Emile; Jean-François Côté; Gorana Tomasic; Christophe Penna; Michel Ducreux; Philippe Rougier; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Pierre Laurent-Puig
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Distinct patterns of KRAS mutations in colorectal carcinomas according to germline mismatch repair defects and hMLH1 methylation status.

Authors:  Carla Oliveira; Jantine L Westra; Diego Arango; Miina Ollikainen; Enric Domingo; Ana Ferreira; Sérgia Velho; Renee Niessen; Kristina Lagerstedt; Pia Alhopuro; Paivi Laiho; Isabel Veiga; Manuel R Teixeira; Marjolijn Ligtenberg; Jan H Kleibeuker; Rolf H Sijmons; John T Plukker; Kohzoh Imai; Pedro Lage; Richard Hamelin; Cristina Albuquerque; Simo Schwartz; Annika Lindblom; Päivi Peltomaki; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Lauri A Aaltonen; Raquel Seruca; Robert M W Hofstra
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Differential activation of ras genes by point mutation in human colon cancer with metastases to either lung or liver.

Authors:  J J Oudejans; R J Slebos; F A Zoetmulder; W J Mooi; S Rodenhuis
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1991-12-02       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Molecular changes in the Ki-ras and APC genes in primary colorectal carcinoma and synchronous metastases compared with the findings in accompanying adenomas.

Authors:  P Zauber; M Sabbath-Solitare; S P Marotta; D T Bishop
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2003-06

9.  K-ras point mutations in human colorectal carcinomas: relation to aneuploidy and metastasis.

Authors:  B Suchy; C Zietz; H M Rabes
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1992-08-19       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  KRAS mutation analysis: a comparison between primary tumours and matched liver metastases in 305 colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  N Knijn; L J M Mekenkamp; M Klomp; M E Vink-Börger; J Tol; S Teerenstra; J W R Meijer; M Tebar; S Riemersma; J H J M van Krieken; C J A Punt; I D Nagtegaal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  18 in total

1.  Prognostic factors after resection of colorectal liver metastases following preoperative second-line chemotherapy: Impact of RAS mutations.

Authors:  G Passot; Y S Chun; S E Kopetz; M J Overman; C Conrad; T A Aloia; J-N Vauthey
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Comparison of KRAS mutation status between primary tumor and metastasis in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Zhe-Zhen Li; Long Bai; Feng Wang; Zi-Chen Zhang; Fang Wang; Zhao-Lei Zeng; Jun-Bo Zeng; Dong-Sheng Zhang; Feng-Hua Wang; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Yu-Hong Li; Jian-Yong Shao; Rui-Hua Xu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Scott E Kopetz; Junichi Shindoh; Su S Chen; Andreas Andreou; Steven A Curley; Thomas A Aloia; Dipen M Maru
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Mutational analysis and clinical correlation of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrea L Russo; Darrell R Borger; Jackie Szymonifka; David P Ryan; Jennifer Y Wo; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Eunice L Kwak; Jill N Allen; Raymond C Wadlow; Andrew X Zhu; Janet E Murphy; Jason E Faris; Dora Dias-Santagata; Kevin M Haigis; Leif W Ellisen; Anthony J Iafrate; Theodore S Hong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Mutational and clinical predictors of pathologic complete response in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrea L Russo; David P Ryan; Darrell R Borger; Jennifer Y Wo; Jackie Szymonifka; Wen-Yih Liang; Eunice L Kwak; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jeffrey W Clark; Jill N Allen; Andrew X Zhu; David L Berger; James C Cusack; Harvey J Mamon; Kevin M Haigis; Theodore S Hong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-03

6.  Predictors of Safety and Efficacy of 2-Stage Hepatectomy for Bilateral Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Guillaume Passot; Yun Shin Chun; Scott E Kopetz; Daria Zorzi; Kristoffer Watten Brudvik; Bradford J Kim; Claudius Conrad; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 7.  Recent Advances in Chemotherapy and Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Guillaume Passot; Olivier Soubrane; Felice Giuliante; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Diane Goéré; Suguru Yamashita; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 11.740

8.  KRAS mutation status is highly homogeneous between areas of the primary tumor and the corresponding metastasis of colorectal adenocarcinomas: one less problem in patient care.

Authors:  Mariana Petaccia de Macedo; Fernanda M Melo; Heber Salvador C Ribeiro; Marcio C Marques; Luciane T Kagohara; Maria Dirlei Begnami; Julio C Neto; Júlia S Ribeiro; Fernando A Soares; Dirce M Carraro; Isabela W Cunha
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.166

9.  KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer metastases after adjuvant FOLFOX for the primary.

Authors:  J-N Vauthey; S Kopetz; T A Aloia; A Andreou
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Genetic Characterization of Cancer of Unknown Primary Using Liquid Biopsy Approaches.

Authors:  Noemi Laprovitera; Irene Salamon; Francesco Gelsomino; Elisa Porcellini; Mattia Riefolo; Marianna Garonzi; Paola Tononi; Sabrina Valente; Silvia Sabbioni; Francesca Fontana; Nicolò Manaresi; Antonia D'Errico; Maria A Pantaleo; Andrea Ardizzoni; Manuela Ferracin
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.