G Passot1, Y S Chun1, S E Kopetz2, M J Overman2, C Conrad1, T A Aloia1, J-N Vauthey3. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: jvauthey@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM), RAS mutations are associated with modest survival benefit and second-line chemotherapy confers limited hope for cure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of RAS mutation after second-line chemotherapy for patients undergoing potentially curative liver resection for CLM. METHODS: Among 1357 patients operated for CLM between January 2005 and November 2014, patients with known RAS mutational status were identified. Outcomes after second-line chemotherapy were analyzed by RAS status. RESULTS: Among 635 patients undergoing resection of CLM, 46 received second-line chemotherapy before resection, including 14 patients (30%) with RAS mutations. Patients who received second-line chemotherapy had significantly larger and greater number of liver metastases and were more likely to undergo major hepatectomy. Median overall (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) were significantly worse among patients requiring second-line chemotherapy (OS: 44.4 vs. 61.1 months, p = 0.021; RFS: 7.3 vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.001). Among patients undergoing liver resection after second-line chemotherapy, RAS mutations were associated with worse median OS and RFS (OS: 35.2 vs. 60.7 months, p = 0.038; RFS: 3.6 vs. 8.3 months, p = 0.015). RAS mutation was the only independent factor associated with OS and RFS. All patients with RAS mutations recurred within 18 months. Among patients with RAS wild-type tumors, the receipt of second-line chemotherapy did not affect OS (p = 0.493). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing resection of CLM after second-line chemotherapy, RAS mutational status is an independent predictor of survival and outweighs other factors to select patients for liver resection.
BACKGROUND: After resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM), RAS mutations are associated with modest survival benefit and second-line chemotherapy confers limited hope for cure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of RAS mutation after second-line chemotherapy for patients undergoing potentially curative liver resection for CLM. METHODS: Among 1357 patients operated for CLM between January 2005 and November 2014, patients with known RAS mutational status were identified. Outcomes after second-line chemotherapy were analyzed by RAS status. RESULTS: Among 635 patients undergoing resection of CLM, 46 received second-line chemotherapy before resection, including 14 patients (30%) with RAS mutations. Patients who received second-line chemotherapy had significantly larger and greater number of liver metastases and were more likely to undergo major hepatectomy. Median overall (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) were significantly worse among patients requiring second-line chemotherapy (OS: 44.4 vs. 61.1 months, p = 0.021; RFS: 7.3 vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.001). Among patients undergoing liver resection after second-line chemotherapy, RAS mutations were associated with worse median OS and RFS (OS: 35.2 vs. 60.7 months, p = 0.038; RFS: 3.6 vs. 8.3 months, p = 0.015). RAS mutation was the only independent factor associated with OS and RFS. All patients with RAS mutations recurred within 18 months. Among patients with RAS wild-type tumors, the receipt of second-line chemotherapy did not affect OS (p = 0.493). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing resection of CLM after second-line chemotherapy, RAS mutational status is an independent predictor of survival and outweighs other factors to select patients for liver resection.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Chusilp Charnsangavej; Bryan Clary; Yuman Fong; Axel Grothey; Timothy M Pawlik; Michael A Choti Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2006-09-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Scott Kopetz; George J Chang; Michael J Overman; Cathy Eng; Daniel J Sargent; David W Larson; Axel Grothey; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; David M Nagorney; Robert R McWilliams Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Scott E Kopetz; Junichi Shindoh; Su S Chen; Andreas Andreou; Steven A Curley; Thomas A Aloia; Dipen M Maru Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: René Adam; Gerard Pascal; Denis Castaing; Daniel Azoulay; Valerie Delvart; Bernard Paule; Francis Levi; Henri Bismuth Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Gunnar Folprecht; Thomas Gruenberger; Wolf O Bechstein; Hans-Rudolf Raab; Florian Lordick; Jörg T Hartmann; Hauke Lang; Andrea Frilling; Jan Stoehlmacher; Jürgen Weitz; Ralf Konopke; Christian Stroszczynski; Torsten Liersch; Detlev Ockert; Thomas Herrmann; Eray Goekkurt; Fabio Parisi; Claus-Henning Köhne Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Giuseppe Zimmitti; Robert E Roses; Andreas Andreou; Junichi Shindoh; Steven A Curley; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Giuseppe Zimmitti; Junichi Shindoh; Yoshihiro Mise; Scott Kopetz; Evelyne M Loyer; Andreas Andreou; Amanda B Cooper; Harmeet Kaur; Thomas A Aloia; Dipen M Maru; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Matthew T Seymour; Timothy S Maughan; Jonathan A Ledermann; Clare Topham; Roger James; Stephen J Gwyther; David B Smith; Stephen Shepherd; Anthony Maraveyas; David R Ferry; Angela M Meade; Lindsay Thompson; Gareth O Griffiths; Mahesh Kb Parmar; Richard J Stephens Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-07-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Raja R Narayan; Jennifer W Harris; Joanne F Chou; Mithat Gönen; Fei Bao; Jinru Shia; Peter J Allen; Vinod P Balachandran; Jeffrey A Drebin; William R Jarnagin; Nancy E Kemeny; T Peter Kingham; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Raja R Narayan; Jashodeep Datta; Debra A Goldman; Victoria G Aveson; Henry S Walch; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Mithat Gönen; Vinod P Balachandran; Jeffrey A Drebin; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham; Alice C Wei; Nikolaus Schultz; Nancy E Kemeny; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Gajendra Shrestha; Shelley M MacNeil; Jasmine A McQuerry; David F Jenkins; Sunil Sharma; Andrea H Bild Journal: Semin Cell Dev Biol Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 7.727