Literature DB >> 28979819

KRAS mutation status is highly homogeneous between areas of the primary tumor and the corresponding metastasis of colorectal adenocarcinomas: one less problem in patient care.

Mariana Petaccia de Macedo1, Fernanda M Melo1, Heber Salvador C Ribeiro2, Marcio C Marques2, Luciane T Kagohara3, Maria Dirlei Begnami1,4, Julio C Neto4, Júlia S Ribeiro1, Fernando A Soares1,3, Dirce M Carraro1,4, Isabela W Cunha1,3.   

Abstract

Background: Mutations in KRAS are negative predictors of the response to anti-EGFR therapies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Yet, the ideal tissue to test for KRAS mutation-primary or metastatic-remains unknown, as is the validity of testing only 1 area of the primary tumor. The aim of this study was to determine the heterogeneity of KRAS mutational status between areas of the primary lesion and between paired primary CRC and the corresponding lymph node (LN), liver, and lung metastasis with a high-sensitivity sequencing method. Design: DNA from 2 or 3 areas from the primary tumor and 1 area of metastatic tissue was obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens from 102 metastatic CRC patients. Mutations in KRAS codons 12, 13, and 61 were analyzed by pyrosequencing.
RESULTS: Ninety-one cases had DNA extracted from more than 1 area of the primary tumor. Only 1 patient showed intratumor heterogeneity, which involved KRAS mutation type, not KRAS mutational status. We examined KRAS mutations in 97 primaries and matched metastatic samples, recording 2 discordant cases, representing 2.1% of our cohort of matched samples.
Conclusion: KRAS status is highly homogeneous throughout primary CRC tumor areas and consistent between the primary tumor and metastatic tissue in the same patient. Our data suggest that testing KRAS mutations in only 1 area of the primary or metastatic tissue is suitable for predicting the response to anti-EGFR treatment and guiding clinical decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic heterogeneity; RAS protein; colorectal neoplasms; molecular pathology; molecular sequence data; precision medicine

Year:  2017        PMID: 28979819      PMCID: PMC5622231     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cancer Res        ISSN: 2156-6976            Impact factor:   6.166


  40 in total

1.  Does neoadjuvant therapy alter KRAS and/or MSI results in rectal adenocarcinoma testing?

Authors:  Sarah L Ondrejka; David F Schaeffer; Maureen A Jakubowski; David A Owen; Mary P Bronner
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA exon 20, and BRAF genotypes in synchronous and metachronous primary colorectal cancers diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Katharina Balschun; Jochen Haag; Ann-Kathrin Wenke; Witigo von Schönfels; Nicolas T Schwarz; Christoph Röcken
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2010 colorectal update.

Authors:  Janet E Murphy; David P Ryan
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.512

4.  Epigenetic profiling of synchronous colorectal neoplasias by quantitative DNA methylation analysis.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Mohan Brahmandam; Takako Kawasaki; Gregory J Kirkner; Massimo Loda; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Daniele Santini; Fotios Loupakis; Bruno Vincenzi; Irene Floriani; Irene Stasi; Emanuele Canestrari; Eliana Rulli; Paolo Enrico Maltese; Francesca Andreoni; Gianluca Masi; Francesco Graziano; Giacomo Giulio Baldi; Lisa Salvatore; Antonio Russo; Giuseppe Perrone; Maria Rosa Tommasino; Mauro Magnani; Alfredo Falcone; Giuseppe Tonini; Annamaria Ruzzo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008-12-04

6.  KRAS mutation testing in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with anti-EGFR therapies.

Authors:  D Soulières; W Greer; Anthony M Magliocco; D Huntsman; S Young; M-S Tsao; S Kamel-Reid
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Changes of KRAS Exon 2 Codon 12/13 Mutation Status in Recurrent Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ottó Dócs; Ferenc Fazakas; Nóra Lugosiné Horváth; László Tóth; Csilla András; Zsolt Horváth; Gábor Méhes
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.201

8.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  KRAS and BRAF mutational status in primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: biological and clinical implications.

Authors:  Antoine Italiano; Isabelle Hostein; Isabelle Soubeyran; Thibault Fabas; Daniel Benchimol; Serge Evrard; Jean Gugenheim; Yves Becouarn; René Brunet; Marianne Fonck; Eric François; Marie-Christine Saint-Paul; Florence Pedeutour
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  KRAS mutational concordance between primary and metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Panagiotis Paliogiannis; Antonio Cossu; Francesco Tanda; Giuseppe Palmieri; Grazia Palomba
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 2.967

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The Contribution of Evolutionary Game Theory to Understanding and Treating Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin Wölfl; Hedy Te Rietmole; Monica Salvioli; Artem Kaznatcheev; Frank Thuijsman; Joel S Brown; Boudewijn Burgering; Kateřina Staňková
Journal:  Dyn Games Appl       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 1.296

Review 2.  Heterogeneity in Colorectal Cancer: A Challenge for Personalized Medicine?

Authors:  Chiara Molinari; Giorgia Marisi; Alessandro Passardi; Laura Matteucci; Giulia De Maio; Paola Ulivi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Biomarker concordance between primary colorectal cancer and its metastases.

Authors:  D S Bhullar; J Barriuso; S Mullamitha; M P Saunders; S T O'Dwyer; O Aziz
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.143

4.  Bayesian hierarchical meta-analytic methods for modeling surrogate relationships that vary across treatment classes using aggregate data.

Authors:  Tasos Papanikos; John R Thompson; Keith R Abrams; Nicolas Städler; Oriana Ciani; Rod Taylor; Sylwia Bujkiewicz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Prognostic Factors of Colorectal Cancer: A Comparative Study on Patients With or Without Liver Metastasis.

Authors:  Honghua Peng; Guifeng Liu; Ying Bao; Xi Zhang; Lehong Zhou; Chenghui Huang; Zewen Song; Sudan Cao; Shiying Dang; Jing Zhang; Tanxiao Huang; Yuling Wu; Mingyan Xu; Lele Song; Peiguo Cao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Radiomics and Radiogenomics in Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Lu-Yao Ma; Xiao-Ping Yin; Bu-Lang Gao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  A novel patient-derived organoids-based xenografts model for preclinical drug response testing in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Mi Jian; Li Ren; Guodong He; Qi Lin; Wentao Tang; Yijiao Chen; Jingwen Chen; Tianyu Liu; Meiling Ji; Ye Wei; Wenju Chang; Jianmin Xu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 8.  Intratumor heterogeneity: A new perspective on colorectal cancer research.

Authors:  Zicheng Zheng; Tao Yu; Xinyu Zhao; Xin Gao; Yao Zhao; Gang Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.