Background: Mutations in KRAS are negative predictors of the response to anti-EGFR therapies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Yet, the ideal tissue to test for KRAS mutation-primary or metastatic-remains unknown, as is the validity of testing only 1 area of the primary tumor. The aim of this study was to determine the heterogeneity of KRAS mutational status between areas of the primary lesion and between paired primary CRC and the corresponding lymph node (LN), liver, and lung metastasis with a high-sensitivity sequencing method. Design: DNA from 2 or 3 areas from the primary tumor and 1 area of metastatic tissue was obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens from 102 metastatic CRC patients. Mutations in KRAS codons 12, 13, and 61 were analyzed by pyrosequencing. RESULTS: Ninety-one cases had DNA extracted from more than 1 area of the primary tumor. Only 1 patient showed intratumor heterogeneity, which involved KRAS mutation type, not KRAS mutational status. We examined KRAS mutations in 97 primaries and matched metastatic samples, recording 2 discordant cases, representing 2.1% of our cohort of matched samples. Conclusion: KRAS status is highly homogeneous throughout primary CRC tumor areas and consistent between the primary tumor and metastatic tissue in the same patient. Our data suggest that testing KRAS mutations in only 1 area of the primary or metastatic tissue is suitable for predicting the response to anti-EGFR treatment and guiding clinical decisions.
Background: Mutations in KRAS are negative predictors of the response to anti-EGFR therapies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Yet, the ideal tissue to test for KRAS mutation-primary or metastatic-remains unknown, as is the validity of testing only 1 area of the primary tumor. The aim of this study was to determine the heterogeneity of KRAS mutational status between areas of the primary lesion and between paired primary CRC and the corresponding lymph node (LN), liver, and lung metastasis with a high-sensitivity sequencing method. Design: DNA from 2 or 3 areas from the primary tumor and 1 area of metastatic tissue was obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens from 102 metastatic CRCpatients. Mutations in KRAS codons 12, 13, and 61 were analyzed by pyrosequencing. RESULTS: Ninety-one cases had DNA extracted from more than 1 area of the primary tumor. Only 1 patient showed intratumor heterogeneity, which involved KRAS mutation type, not KRAS mutational status. We examined KRAS mutations in 97 primaries and matched metastatic samples, recording 2 discordant cases, representing 2.1% of our cohort of matched samples. Conclusion:KRAS status is highly homogeneous throughout primary CRC tumor areas and consistent between the primary tumor and metastatic tissue in the same patient. Our data suggest that testing KRAS mutations in only 1 area of the primary or metastatic tissue is suitable for predicting the response to anti-EGFR treatment and guiding clinical decisions.
Authors: Sarah L Ondrejka; David F Schaeffer; Maureen A Jakubowski; David A Owen; Mary P Bronner Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Ottó Dócs; Ferenc Fazakas; Nóra Lugosiné Horváth; László Tóth; Csilla András; Zsolt Horváth; Gábor Méhes Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Panagiotis Paliogiannis; Antonio Cossu; Francesco Tanda; Giuseppe Palmieri; Grazia Palomba Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Benjamin Wölfl; Hedy Te Rietmole; Monica Salvioli; Artem Kaznatcheev; Frank Thuijsman; Joel S Brown; Boudewijn Burgering; Kateřina Staňková Journal: Dyn Games Appl Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 1.296
Authors: Tasos Papanikos; John R Thompson; Keith R Abrams; Nicolas Städler; Oriana Ciani; Rod Taylor; Sylwia Bujkiewicz Journal: Stat Med Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 2.373