BACKGROUND: Early identification of mutations may guide patients with metastatic colorectal cancer toward targeted therapies that may be life prolonging. The authors assessed tumor genotype correlations with clinical characteristics to determine whether mutational profiling can account for clinical similarities, differences, and outcomes. METHODS: Under Institutional Review Board approval, 222 patients with metastatic colon adenocarcinoma (n = 158) and rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 64) who underwent clinical tumor genotyping were reviewed. Multiplexed tumor genotyping screened for >150 mutations across 15 commonly mutated cancer genes. The chi-square test was used to assess genotype frequency by tumor site and additional clinical characteristics. Cox multivariate analysis was used to assess the impact of genotype on overall survival. RESULTS: Broad-based tumor genotyping revealed clinical and anatomic differences that could be linked to gene mutations. NRAS mutations were associated with rectal cancer versus colon cancer (12.5% vs 0.6%; P < .001) and with age ≥56 years (7% vs 0.9%; P = .02). Conversely, v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutations were associated with colon cancer (13% vs 3%; P = .024) and older age (15.8% vs 4.6%; P = .006). TP53 mutations were associated with rectal cancer (30% vs 18%; P = .048), younger age (14% vs 28.7%; P = .007), and men (26.4% vs 14%; P = .03). Lung metastases were associated with PIK3CA mutations (23% vs 8.7%; P = .004). Only mutations in BRAF were independently associated with decreased overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-5.27; P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that underlying molecular profiles can differ between colon and rectal cancers. Further investigation is warranted to assess whether the differences identified are important in determining the optimal treatment course for these patients.
BACKGROUND: Early identification of mutations may guide patients with metastatic colorectal cancer toward targeted therapies that may be life prolonging. The authors assessed tumor genotype correlations with clinical characteristics to determine whether mutational profiling can account for clinical similarities, differences, and outcomes. METHODS: Under Institutional Review Board approval, 222 patients with metastatic colon adenocarcinoma (n = 158) and rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 64) who underwent clinical tumor genotyping were reviewed. Multiplexed tumor genotyping screened for >150 mutations across 15 commonly mutated cancer genes. The chi-square test was used to assess genotype frequency by tumor site and additional clinical characteristics. Cox multivariate analysis was used to assess the impact of genotype on overall survival. RESULTS: Broad-based tumor genotyping revealed clinical and anatomic differences that could be linked to gene mutations. NRAS mutations were associated with rectal cancer versus colon cancer (12.5% vs 0.6%; P < .001) and with age ≥56 years (7% vs 0.9%; P = .02). Conversely, v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutations were associated with colon cancer (13% vs 3%; P = .024) and older age (15.8% vs 4.6%; P = .006). TP53 mutations were associated with rectal cancer (30% vs 18%; P = .048), younger age (14% vs 28.7%; P = .007), and men (26.4% vs 14%; P = .03). Lung metastases were associated with PIK3CA mutations (23% vs 8.7%; P = .004). Only mutations in BRAF were independently associated with decreased overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-5.27; P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that underlying molecular profiles can differ between colon and rectal cancers. Further investigation is warranted to assess whether the differences identified are important in determining the optimal treatment course for these patients.
Authors: Margreet Lüchtenborg; Matty P Weijenberg; Ellen Kampman; Goos N van Muijen; Guido M J M Roemen; Maurice P A Zeegers; R Alexandra Goldbohm; Pieter van 't Veer; Anton F P M de Goeij; Piet A van den Brandt Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Brenda Diergaarde; Alina Vrieling; Annemieke A van Kraats; Goos N P van Muijen; Frans J Kok; Ellen Kampman Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Wade S Samowitz; Carol Sweeney; Jennifer Herrick; Hans Albertsen; Theodore R Levin; Maureen A Murtaugh; Roger K Wolff; Martha L Slattery Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Elke Hacker; Eduardo Nagore; Lorenzo Cerroni; Susan L Woods; Nicholas K Hayward; Brett Chapman; Grant W Montgomery; H Peter Soyer; David C Whiteman Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Arnaud D Roth; Sabine Tejpar; Mauro Delorenzi; Pu Yan; Roberto Fiocca; Dirk Klingbiel; Daniel Dietrich; Bart Biesmans; György Bodoky; Carlo Barone; Enrique Aranda; Bernard Nordlinger; Laura Cisar; Roberto Labianca; David Cunningham; Eric Van Cutsem; Fred Bosman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Dora Dias-Santagata; Sara Akhavanfard; Serena S David; Kathy Vernovsky; Georgiana Kuhlmann; Susan L Boisvert; Hannah Stubbs; Ultan McDermott; Jeffrey Settleman; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; Steven J Isakoff; Lecia V Sequist; Jeffrey A Engelman; Thomas J Lynch; Daniel A Haber; David N Louis; Leif W Ellisen; Darrell R Borger; A John Iafrate Journal: EMBO Mol Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 12.137
Authors: George Papaxoinis; Vassiliki Kotoula; Eleni Giannoulatou; Georgia-Angeliki Koliou; Vasilios Karavasilis; Sotirios Lakis; Andreas Koureas; Mattheos Bobos; Elpida Chalaralambous; Emily Daskalaki; Kyriakos Chatzopoulos; George Tsironis; Elisavet Pazarli; Sofia Chrisafi; Epaminontas Samantas; Ioannis G Kaklamanos; Ioannis Varthalitis; Athina Konstantara; Konstantinos N Syrigos; George Pentheroudakis; Dimitrios Pectasides; George Fountzilas Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Julian Walter Holch; Maximilian Demmer; Charlotte Lamersdorf; Marlies Michl; Christoph Schulz; Jobst Christian von Einem; Dominik Paul Modest; Volker Heinemann Journal: Visc Med Date: 2017-02-07
Authors: Bianca Mostert; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Joan Bolt-de Vries; Jaco Kraan; Zarina Lalmahomed; Anne van Galen; Petra van der Spoel; Vanja de Weerd; Raquel Ramírez-Moreno; Marcel Smid; Cornelis Verhoef; Jan N M IJzermans; Jan W Gratama; Stefan Sleijfer; John A Foekens; John W M Martens Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Qiong J Wang; Zhiya Yu; Kayla Griffith; Ken-ichi Hanada; Nicholas P Restifo; James C Yang Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 11.151