Literature DB >> 24500602

Mutational analysis and clinical correlation of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Andrea L Russo1, Darrell R Borger, Jackie Szymonifka, David P Ryan, Jennifer Y Wo, Lawrence S Blaszkowsky, Eunice L Kwak, Jill N Allen, Raymond C Wadlow, Andrew X Zhu, Janet E Murphy, Jason E Faris, Dora Dias-Santagata, Kevin M Haigis, Leif W Ellisen, Anthony J Iafrate, Theodore S Hong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early identification of mutations may guide patients with metastatic colorectal cancer toward targeted therapies that may be life prolonging. The authors assessed tumor genotype correlations with clinical characteristics to determine whether mutational profiling can account for clinical similarities, differences, and outcomes.
METHODS: Under Institutional Review Board approval, 222 patients with metastatic colon adenocarcinoma (n = 158) and rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 64) who underwent clinical tumor genotyping were reviewed. Multiplexed tumor genotyping screened for >150 mutations across 15 commonly mutated cancer genes. The chi-square test was used to assess genotype frequency by tumor site and additional clinical characteristics. Cox multivariate analysis was used to assess the impact of genotype on overall survival.
RESULTS: Broad-based tumor genotyping revealed clinical and anatomic differences that could be linked to gene mutations. NRAS mutations were associated with rectal cancer versus colon cancer (12.5% vs 0.6%; P < .001) and with age ≥56 years (7% vs 0.9%; P = .02). Conversely, v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutations were associated with colon cancer (13% vs 3%; P = .024) and older age (15.8% vs 4.6%; P = .006). TP53 mutations were associated with rectal cancer (30% vs 18%; P = .048), younger age (14% vs 28.7%; P = .007), and men (26.4% vs 14%; P = .03). Lung metastases were associated with PIK3CA mutations (23% vs 8.7%; P = .004). Only mutations in BRAF were independently associated with decreased overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-5.27; P = .029).
CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that underlying molecular profiles can differ between colon and rectal cancers. Further investigation is warranted to assess whether the differences identified are important in determining the optimal treatment course for these patients.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF; NRAS; clinicopathologic; colorectal cancer; mutation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24500602      PMCID: PMC4327902          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  29 in total

Review 1.  A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  E R Fearon; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  The TP53 colorectal cancer international collaborative study on the prognostic and predictive significance of p53 mutation: influence of tumor site, type of mutation, and adjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Antonio Russo; Viviana Bazan; Barry Iacopetta; David Kerr; Thierry Soussi; Nicola Gebbia
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer: APC mutations, hMLH1 expression, and GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms.

Authors:  Margreet Lüchtenborg; Matty P Weijenberg; Ellen Kampman; Goos N van Muijen; Guido M J M Roemen; Maurice P A Zeegers; R Alexandra Goldbohm; Pieter van 't Veer; Anton F P M de Goeij; Piet A van den Brandt
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 4.  Biology of the adenomatous polyposis coli tumor suppressor.

Authors:  K H Goss; J Groden
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Cigarette smoking and genetic alterations in sporadic colon carcinomas.

Authors:  Brenda Diergaarde; Alina Vrieling; Annemieke A van Kraats; Goos N P van Muijen; Frans J Kok; Ellen Kampman
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Poor survival associated with the BRAF V600E mutation in microsatellite-stable colon cancers.

Authors:  Wade S Samowitz; Carol Sweeney; Jennifer Herrick; Hans Albertsen; Theodore R Levin; Maureen A Murtaugh; Roger K Wolff; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  NRAS and BRAF mutations in cutaneous melanoma and the association with MC1R genotype: findings from Spanish and Austrian populations.

Authors:  Elke Hacker; Eduardo Nagore; Lorenzo Cerroni; Susan L Woods; Nicholas K Hayward; Brett Chapman; Grant W Montgomery; H Peter Soyer; David C Whiteman
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 8.551

8.  Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial.

Authors:  Arnaud D Roth; Sabine Tejpar; Mauro Delorenzi; Pu Yan; Roberto Fiocca; Dirk Klingbiel; Daniel Dietrich; Bart Biesmans; György Bodoky; Carlo Barone; Enrique Aranda; Bernard Nordlinger; Laura Cisar; Roberto Labianca; David Cunningham; Eric Van Cutsem; Fred Bosman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Somatic EGFR mutations and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in NSCLC.

Authors:  Helena Linardou; Issa J Dahabreh; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Paris Kosmidis; Samuel Murray
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Rapid targeted mutational analysis of human tumours: a clinical platform to guide personalized cancer medicine.

Authors:  Dora Dias-Santagata; Sara Akhavanfard; Serena S David; Kathy Vernovsky; Georgiana Kuhlmann; Susan L Boisvert; Hannah Stubbs; Ultan McDermott; Jeffrey Settleman; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; Steven J Isakoff; Lecia V Sequist; Jeffrey A Engelman; Thomas J Lynch; Daniel A Haber; David N Louis; Leif W Ellisen; Darrell R Borger; A John Iafrate
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.137

View more
  33 in total

1.  Phase II study of panitumumab combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: clinical results including extended tumor genotyping.

Authors:  George Papaxoinis; Vassiliki Kotoula; Eleni Giannoulatou; Georgia-Angeliki Koliou; Vasilios Karavasilis; Sotirios Lakis; Andreas Koureas; Mattheos Bobos; Elpida Chalaralambous; Emily Daskalaki; Kyriakos Chatzopoulos; George Tsironis; Elisavet Pazarli; Sofia Chrisafi; Epaminontas Samantas; Ioannis G Kaklamanos; Ioannis Varthalitis; Athina Konstantara; Konstantinos N Syrigos; George Pentheroudakis; Dimitrios Pectasides; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Pattern and Dynamics of Distant Metastases in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Julian Walter Holch; Maximilian Demmer; Charlotte Lamersdorf; Marlies Michl; Christoph Schulz; Jobst Christian von Einem; Dominik Paul Modest; Volker Heinemann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 3.  RAS and BRAF in metastatic colorectal cancer management.

Authors:  Jun Gong; May Cho; Marwan Fakih
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-10

Review 4.  Impact of somatic mutations on patterns of metastasis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Marla Lipsyc; Rona Yaeger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12

5.  mRNA expression profiles in circulating tumor cells of metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Bianca Mostert; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Joan Bolt-de Vries; Jaco Kraan; Zarina Lalmahomed; Anne van Galen; Petra van der Spoel; Vanja de Weerd; Raquel Ramírez-Moreno; Marcel Smid; Cornelis Verhoef; Jan N M IJzermans; Jan W Gratama; Stefan Sleijfer; John A Foekens; John W M Martens
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  Impact of RAS and BRAF mutations on carcinoembryonic antigen production and pattern of colorectal metastases.

Authors:  May Cho; Chie Akiba; Cecilia Lau; David Smith; Milhan Telatar; Michelle Afkhami; Stephen Sentovich; Kurt Melstrom; Marwan Fakih
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-01-15

7.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in rectal cancer: relationship with the RAS mutational status.

Authors:  Pierre Lovinfosse; Benjamin Koopmansch; Frederic Lambert; Sébastien Jodogne; Gaelle Kustermans; Mathieu Hatt; Dimitris Visvikis; Laurence Seidel; Marc Polus; Adelin Albert; Philippe Delvenne; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Identification of T-cell Receptors Targeting KRAS-Mutated Human Tumors.

Authors:  Qiong J Wang; Zhiya Yu; Kayla Griffith; Ken-ichi Hanada; Nicholas P Restifo; James C Yang
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 11.151

Review 9.  Segmental distribution of some common molecular markers for colorectal cancer (CRC): influencing factors and potential implications.

Authors:  Petros Christakis Papagiorgis
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-02-03

10.  Association between oncogenic RAS mutation and radiologic-pathologic findings in patients with primary rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sung Jae Jo; Seung Ho Kim
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.