Literature DB >> 22615150

Factors influencing segmental lumbar lordosis after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion.

Christopher K Kepler1, Russel C Huang, Amit K Sharma, Dennis S Meredith, Ochuko Metitiri, Andrew A Sama, Federico P Girardi, Frank P Cammisa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although contributions to sagittal alignment have been characterized for anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, sagittal alignment after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion (LTIF) has not yet been characterized. This study examined the ability of LTIF to restore lumbar lordosis and identified factors associated with change in sagittal alignment.
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients and 67 levels were studied. Segmental lordosis, anterior-posterior cage position, and cage obliquity were measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs and CT scans. Change in sagittal alignment was analyzed with respect to demographic information and measures of cage position and obliquity to identify factors associated with segmental alignment change.
RESULTS: Mean lordosis increased 3.7° at instrumented segments, increasing from 4.1° preoperatively to 7.8° postoperatively. Although increases at each level were significant, there were no significant differences between levels. Lordosis increase was inversely-associated with preoperative lordosis; levels with the least preoperative lordosis gained the most lordosis. Cage obliquity and height were not significantly associated with lordosis change. Anterior cage placement resulted in the largest lordosis gain (+7.4°/level) while posterior placement was prokyphotic (-1.2°/level). There were no significant associations with age, sex or body mass index.
CONCLUSION: Anteroposterior cage placement is an important intraoperative determinant of postoperative alignment; anterior placement results in greater lordosis while middle/posterior placement has a minimal effect on sagittal alignment.
© 2012 Tianjin Hospital and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22615150      PMCID: PMC6583189          DOI: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2012.00175.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.071


  31 in total

1.  Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs.

Authors:  T Steffen; A Tsantrizos; M Aebi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  Scott D Daffner; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2003-02

3.  The effect of sagittal alignment on adjacent joint mobility after lumbar instrumentation--a biomechanical study of lumbar vertebrae in a porcine model.

Authors:  Wen-Jer Chen; Po-Liang Lai; Ching-Lung Tai; Lih-Huei Chen; Chi-Chien Niu
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Frank J Schwab; Vinson A Smith; Michele Biserni; Lorenzo Gamez; Jean-Pierre C Farcy; Murali Pagala
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments.

Authors:  S Umehara; M R Zindrick; A G Patwardhan; R M Havey; L A Vrbos; G W Knight; S Miyano; M Kirincic; K Kaneda; M A Lorenz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Lumbar sagittal alignment after fusion with a threaded interbody cage.

Authors:  J A Goldstein; M J Macenski; S L Griffith; P C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  M N Kumar; A Baklanov; D Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  O Hägg; P Fritzell; A Nordwall
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A critical analysis of the literature regarding surgical approach and outcome for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Brian K Kwon; Alan S Hilibrand; Kelly Malloy; Paul E Savas; Marco T Silva; Todd J Albert; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

Review 10.  Degenerative lumbar scoliosis: evaluation and management.

Authors:  Clifford B Tribus
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.020

View more
  16 in total

1.  Single transverse-orientation cage via MIS-TLIF approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a technical note.

Authors:  Shan-Jin Wang; Ying-Chao Han; Fu-Min Pan; Bin Ma; Jun Tan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

2.  Is the lateral transpsoas approach feasible for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis?

Authors:  Carlos Castro; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Luis Marchi; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A radiographic analysis of cage positioning in lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Timothy L T Siu; Elmira Najafi; Kainu Lin
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-11-22

5.  Comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with direct lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological results.

Authors:  Young Seok Lee; Young Baeg Kim; Seung Won Park; Chan Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-12-31

6.  Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Young Seok Lee; Seung Won Park; Young Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-05-31

7.  Radiographic Comparison of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Traditional Fusion Approaches: Analysis of Sagittal Contour Change.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Sharon C Yson; Ryan D Horazdovsky; Edward Rainier G Santos; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-05-19

8.  Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following oblique lumbar interbody fusion: A case report.

Authors:  Jong-Hwan Hong; Moon-Soo Han; Jung-Kil Lee; Bong Ju Moon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Sagittal Balance Correction in Lateral Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Scoliosis.

Authors:  Daniel J Blizzard; Michael A Gallizzi; Charles Sheets; Benjamin T Smith; Robert E Isaacs; Megan Eure; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-08-25

10.  Comparison of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with open versus percutaneous screw fixation for adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  John Attenello; Charles Chang; Yu-Po Lee; Vinko Zlomislic; Steven Robert Garfin; Richard Todd Allen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.