Literature DB >> 15342147

The effect of sagittal alignment on adjacent joint mobility after lumbar instrumentation--a biomechanical study of lumbar vertebrae in a porcine model.

Wen-Jer Chen1, Po-Liang Lai, Ching-Lung Tai, Lih-Huei Chen, Chi-Chien Niu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms and changes in range of motion of neighboring mobile segment (adjacent level) after the instrumented posterior stabilization are not completely understood. This study aims to investigate the effect of sagittal alignment on the adjacent joint mobility after lumbar instrumentation.
METHODS: Eight fresh porcine lumbar spines were instrumented with pedicle screw implants from L2 to L4. Each specimen was tested in three different sagittal alignments. Group A were instrumented in lordotic alignment (lordosis 20 degrees ), Group B in straight alignment (lordosis 0 degrees ), and Group C in kyphotic alignment (kyphosis 20 degrees ). Hydraulic testing machine was used to generate an increasing moment in flexion and extension respectively for each specimen. The vertebral displacement of the disc between L1-L2 and L4-L5 were measured simultaneously with an extensometer.
FINDINGS: There were no significant differences in vertebral displacement between the three different sagittal alignments in both the superior and inferior adjacent segments under extension motion. However, under flexion motion, the vertebral displacement on the superior adjacent segment (L1-L2) with kyphotic alignment was statistically larger than that of the straight and lordotic alignments (P = 0.0198 and P = 0.000473 respectively), and no differences were found between the three different sagittal alignments on the inferior adjacent segment (L4-L5).
INTERPRETATION: The iatrogenically produced kyphotic lumbar spine by posterior instrumentation might cause larger adjacent joint mobility on the superior adjacent joint as compared to the instrumented lordotic lumbar spine. This study implies that an instrumented spine in lordosis is less likely to develop adjacent instability than a kyphotic spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15342147     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  16 in total

Review 1.  Adjacent segment disease perspective and review of the literature.

Authors:  Fanor M Saavedra-Pozo; Renato A M Deusdara; Edward C Benzel
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

2.  Clinical outcomes and sagittal alignment of single-level unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a 4 to 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yun Liang; Weibin Shi; Chun Jiang; Zixian Chen; Fubing Liu; Zhenzhou Feng; Xiaoxing Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Effect of multiple freeze-thaw cycles on intervertebral dynamic motion characteristics in the porcine lumbar spine.

Authors:  Michio Hongo; Ralph E Gay; Jui-Ting Hsu; Kristin D Zhao; Brice Ilharreborde; Lawrence J Berglund; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Does hybrid fixation prevent junctional disease after posterior fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders? A minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Andrea Baioni; Mario Di Silvestre; Tiziana Greggi; Francesco Vommaro; Francesco Lolli; Antonio Scarale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Analysis of single cage position in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion through digital images.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Chen Chen; Tangjun Zhou; Jie Mi; Lin Du; Zhanrong Kang; Jianming Huang; Kai Zhang; Xiaojiang Sun; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Factors influencing segmental lumbar lordosis after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion.

Authors:  Christopher K Kepler; Russel C Huang; Amit K Sharma; Dennis S Meredith; Ochuko Metitiri; Andrew A Sama; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  Radiographic Comparison of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Traditional Fusion Approaches: Analysis of Sagittal Contour Change.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Sharon C Yson; Ryan D Horazdovsky; Edward Rainier G Santos; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-05-19

Review 9.  Patient-Related Risk Factors for the Development of Lumbar Spine Adjacent Segment Pathology.

Authors:  Eduardo Moreira Pinto; Artur Teixeria; Richado Frada; Filipa Oliveira; Pedro Atilano; Tânia Veigas; António Miranda
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-06-24

10.  Dorsal paddle leads implant for spinal cord stimulation through laminotomy with midline structures preservation.

Authors:  Massimo Mearini; Riccardo Bergomi; Pier Paolo Panciani; Roberto Stefini; Giacomo Esposito; G Marco Sicuri; Emanuele Costi; Gabriele Ronchetti; Marco Fontanella
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.