Literature DB >> 25132930

Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological outcomes.

Young Seok Lee1, Seung Won Park1, Young Baeg Kim1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: According to the recent development of minimally invasive spinal surgery, direct lumbar interbody fusion (DLIF) was introduced as an effective option to treat lumbar degenerative diseases. However, comprehensive results of DLIF have not been reported in Korea yet. The object of this study is to summarize radiological and clinical outcomes of our DLIF experience.
METHODS: We performed DLIF for 130 patients from May 2011 to June 2013. Among them, 90 patients, who could be followed up for more than 6 months, were analyzed retrospectively. Clinical outcomes were compared using visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Bilateral foramen areas, disc height, segmental coronal and sagittal angle, and regional sagittal angle were measured. Additionally, fusion rate was assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 90 patients, 116 levels, were underwent DLIF. The VAS and ODI improved statistically significant after surgery. All the approaches for DLIF were done on the left side. The left and right side foramen area changed from 99.5 mm(2) and 102.9 mm(2) to 159.2 mm(2) and 151.2 mm(2) postoperatively (p<0.001). Pre- and postoperative segmental coronal and sagittal angles changed statistically significant from 4.1° and 9.9° to 1.1° and 11.1°. Fusion rates of 6 and 12 months were 60.9% and 87.8%. Complications occurred in 17 patients (18.9%). However, most of the complications were resolved within 2 months.
CONCLUSION: DLIF is not only effective for indirect decompression and deformity correction but also shows satisfactory mechanical stability and fusion rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcomes; Direct lumbar interbody fusion; Minimal invasive spine surgery; Radiological outcomes

Year:  2014        PMID: 25132930      PMCID: PMC4130949          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2014.55.5.248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  38 in total

1.  An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Takatomo Moro; Shin-ichi Kikuchi; Shin-ichi Konno; Hiroyuki Yaginuma
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.

Authors:  W Blake Rodgers; Edward J Gerber; Jamie Patterson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira; Luis Marchi; Etevaldo Coutinho; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Posterolateral versus interbody fusion in isthmic spondylolisthesis: functional results in 52 cases with a minimum follow-up of 6 years.

Authors:  Emile Dehoux; Elyes Fourati; Karim Madi; Brian Reddy; Philippe Segal
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.500

5.  A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support.

Authors:  Thomas G Lowe; Shukor Hashim; Lucas A Wilson; Michael F O'Brien; David A B Smith; Molly J Diekmann; Julie Trommeter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Byung-Uk Kang; Sang-Ho Lee; Byungjoo Jung; Young-Geun Choi; Sang Hyeop Jeon; Ho Yeon Lee
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-04

7.  Biomechanical analysis of thoracolumbar interbody constructs. How important is the endplate?

Authors:  J P Hollowell; D G Vollmer; C R Wilson; F A Pintar; N Yoganandan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Nerve injury during the transpsoas approach for lumbar fusion.

Authors:  John K Houten; Lucien C Alexandre; Rani Nasser; Adam L Wollowick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-05-27

9.  Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Rebecca Rosemann; Bhavraj Khalsa; Eli M Baron
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.047

10.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter; Brett A Freedman; Eric G Verwiebe; Jordan M Hall; David W Polly; Timothy R Kuklo
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-08
View more
  18 in total

1.  Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Patrick Belton; Hekmat Zarzour; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

Review 2.  Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Kevin Phan; Greg Malham; Kevin Seex; Prashanth J Rao
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

3.  Comparison of pure lateral and oblique lateral inter-body fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disk disease: a multicentric cohort study.

Authors:  Massimo Miscusi; Alessandro Ramieri; Stefano Forcato; Mary Giuffrè; Sokol Trungu; Marco Cimatti; Alessandro Pesce; Pietro Familiari; Amedeo Piazza; Cristina Carnevali; Giuseppe Costanzo; Antonino Raco
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The Change of Spinal Canal According to Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Young-Seok Lee; Dong-Hyun Lee; Dae-Chul Cho; Inbo Han; Chi Heon Kim; Heum-Dai Kwon; Kyoung-Tae Kim
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-05-13

5.  Efficacy of Single-Position Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Peng Cheng; Xiao-Bo Zhang; Qi-Ming Zhao; Hai-Hong Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Outcomes of direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) in an Australian cohort.

Authors:  Daniel B Scherman; Prashanth J Rao; Kevin Phan; Sean F Mungovan; Kenneth Faulder; Gordon Dandie
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-03

7.  A psoas splitting approach developed for outpatient lateral interbody fusion versus a standard transpsoas approach.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Fabio J R Pencle; Morgan D Brown; Jason A Seale
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

Review 8.  Interbody Fusions in the Lumbar Spine: A Review.

Authors:  Ravi Verma; Sohrab Virk; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-01-13

Review 9.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: What Is the Evidence of Indirect Neural Decompression? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Emanuele Quarto; Andrea Zanirato; Lorenzo Mosconi; Davide Vallerga; Irene Zotta; Maddalena Lontaro Baracchini; Carlo Formica; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-03-20

10.  Restoring spinopelvic harmony with lateral lumbar interbody fusion: is it a realistic goal?

Authors:  Mina Asaid; Aram Cox; Monique Breslin; Declan Siedler; Chester Sutterlin; Arvind Dubey
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.