Literature DB >> 19074758

How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.

C Thorpe1, B Ryan, S L McLean, A Burt, M Stewart, J B Brown, G J Reid, S Harris.   

Abstract

This paper outlines ways to maximize response rates to surveys by summarizing the most relevant literature to date and demonstrating how these techniques have resulted in consistently high rates of return in family practice research. We describe the methodology used in recent surveys of physicians conducted by the Centre for Studies in Family Medicine through its Thames Valley Family Practice Research Unit, located in London, Ontario, Canada and funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. The identification and implementation of these techniques to maximize response rates is critical, as primary health care researchers often rely on information gathered through questionnaires to study physicians' practice profiles, experiences and attitudes. Four separate and distinct mailed surveys of physicians using a modified Dillman approach were conducted from 2001 to 2004. The sampling strategies, topics, types of questions and response formats of these surveys varied. The first survey did not use any incentives or recorded delivery/registered mail and received a response rate of 48%. In sharp contrast, the other three surveys obtained responses rates of 76%, 74%, 74%, respectively, achieved through the use of gift certificates and recorded delivery/registered mail. Sending a survey by recorded delivery/registered mail tends to result in the survey package being given priority in the physicians' incoming mail at the practice. Gift certificates partially compensate physicians for time spent completing the survey and recognition of the time required is appreciated. The response rates achieved provide strong evidence to support the use of monetary incentives and recorded delivery/registered mail (along with the Dillman approach) in survey research. It is anticipated that this evidence will be used by other researchers to justify requests for funding to cover the costs associated with incentives and recorded delivery/registered mail. We recommend the use of these strategies to maximize response rates and improve the quality of this type of primary health care research.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19074758     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmn097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  73 in total

1.  Evaluation of quantitative debriefing after pediatric cardiac arrest.

Authors:  C Zebuhr; R M Sutton; W Morrison; D Niles; L Boyle; A Nishisaki; P Meaney; J Leffelman; R A Berg; V M Nadkarni
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  General practitioners' and occupational health physicians' views on their cooperation: a cross-sectional postal survey.

Authors:  Dirk Moßhammer; Martina Michaelis; Jakob Mehne; Stefan Wilm; Monika A Rieger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Oncologists' use of patient educational materials about cancer and fertility preservation.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Teri Malo; Joyce Reinecke; Bethanne Bower; Terrance Albrecht; Marla L Clayman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?

Authors:  Ellen R Wiebe; Janusz Kaczorowski; Jacqueline MacKay
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  International health policy survey in 11 countries: assessment of non-response bias in the Norwegian sample.

Authors:  Oyvind A Bjertnaes; Hilde H Iversen; Geir Bukholm
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Statistical Application and Cost Saving in a Dental Survey.

Authors:  Po-Huang Chyou; Dixie Schroeder; Kelsey Schwei; Amit Acharya
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2017-04-03

7.  Prevalence and determinants of cannabinoid prescription for the management of chronic noncancer pain: a postal survey of physicians in the Abitibi-Témiscamingue region of Quebec.

Authors:  Huguette St-Amant; Mark A Ware; Nancy Julien; Anaïs Lacasse
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

8.  Chemotherapy for 70-Year-Old Women with Breast Cancer in Germany: A Survey by the German Breast Group.

Authors:  J Barinoff; A Traut; D Bauerschlag; J Bischoff; D Herr; K Lübbe; H-J Lück; N Maass; C Mundhenke; M Schmidt; K Schwedler; M Thill; J Steffen; S Loibl; G von Minckwitz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Pediatricians' self-reported role in treating children and adolescents with major depressive disorder: a national random survey.

Authors:  Andrea R Pfalzgraf; Virginia Scott; Eugene H Makela; Steven L Hartsock; Jan Kavookjian; Lesley-Ann Miller
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2012-07-26

10.  Differential effects of pre and post-payment on neurologists' response rates to a postal survey.

Authors:  Richard A A Kanaan; Simon C Wessely; David Armstrong
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.