Literature DB >> 26089716

Third-party online surveys-science, selling, or sugging?

S Mazzarello1, M Clemons2, I D Graham3, A A Joy4, S Smith1, C Jacobs2.   

Abstract

Year:  2015        PMID: 26089716      PMCID: PMC4462527          DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan B VanGeest; Timothy P Johnson; Verna L Welch
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?

Authors:  Ellen R Wiebe; Janusz Kaczorowski; Jacqueline MacKay
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Surviving Surveys.

Authors:  Sasha Mazzarello; Mark Clemons; Ian D Graham; Carmel Jacobs
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.

Authors:  Inese Grava-Gubins; Sarah Scott
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Patient perceptions and expectations regarding imaging for metastatic disease in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Demetrios Simos; Brian Hutton; Ian D Graham; Angel Arnaout; Jean-Michel Caudrelier; Sasha Mazzarello; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-04-05
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  A simple approach for eliminating spam.

Authors:  Sasha Mazzarello; Michael Fralick; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.