Literature DB >> 33725273

Assessment of Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge and Understanding of the Risk of Blood Typing Interference with Daratumumab: A Survey of 12 European Countries.

Mathieu Rosé1, Intissar Bourahla1, Alessandro Ghiddi2, Assem Al-Akabawi3, Edmond Chan3, Massoud Toussi1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, is approved to treat multiple myeloma. Red blood cells express low levels of CD38, which can result in a false-positive antibody screen in daratumumab-treated patients. Educational materials were developed to inform healthcare professionals (HCPs) and blood transfusion management department personnel (BTMDP) about this risk and recommended measures to mitigate that risk. Materials were distributed in European countries where daratumumab was commercially available. This post-authorization safety study was designed to evaluate whether HCPs and BTMDP understood the materials.
METHODS: An anonymous, cross-sectional, non-interventional, web-based survey was distributed in 12 European countries. Four key questions were identified, for which a correct answer from at least 80% of respondents was considered indicative of satisfactory effectiveness.
RESULTS: A total of 408 participants completed the questionnaires (62.3% (n = 254) HCPs and 37.7% (n = 154) BTMDP). Responses were consistent between groups. All respondents were aware of the educational materials (the first key question) and at least 80% correctly answered three of the four key questions. A key question regarding which blood typing test(s) daratumumab interferes with did not achieve satisfactory effectiveness (60% correct responses). In a weighted analysis, 79% of respondents correctly identified the recommended measures for daratumumab-treated patients requiring transfusion. This was attributed to an error in the survey's German translation; in a sensitivity analysis, 90% of participants correctly responded to this question.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that participants were aware of the educational materials, the risk of daratumumab interference with blood testing, and recommended measures to mitigate that risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additional risk management measures; Antibody screening; Daratumumab; Educational materials; Multiple myeloma; Post-authorization safety study; Survey research

Year:  2021        PMID: 33725273     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01685-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  5 in total

1.  Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?

Authors:  Ellen R Wiebe; Janusz Kaczorowski; Jacqueline MacKay
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  'So much post, so busy with practice--so, no time!': a telephone survey of general practitioners' reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveys.

Authors:  E F Kaner; C A Haighton; B R McAvoy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Additional Risk Minimization Measures for Voriconazole in the EU: Findings and Lessons Learned from a Healthcare Professional Survey.

Authors:  Joanna Lem; Muhammad Younus; Jalal A Aram; Shahrzad Moosavi; Klaus Freivogel; Anne Lewis; Rachel E Sobel
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-04

4.  Additional Risk Minimisation Measures for Medicinal Products in the European Union: A Review of the Implementation and Effectiveness of Measures in the United Kingdom by One Marketing Authorisation Holder.

Authors:  Elaine Agyemang; Lorna Bailey; John Talbot
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2017-03-29

5.  Evaluation of Risk-Minimization Activities for Cyproterone Acetate 2 mg/Ethinylestradiol 35 µg: A Cross-Sectional Physician Survey.

Authors:  Kimberly H Davis; Alex Asiimwe; Laurie J Zografos; David J McSorley; Elizabeth B Andrews
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2017-08-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.