OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of a flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery-arterial spin labeling (FAIR-ASL) technique to track renal perfusion changes during pharmacologic and physiologic alterations in renal blood flow using microspheres as a gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fluorescent microsphere and FAIR-ASL perfusion were compared in the cortex of the kidney for 11 swine across 4 interventional time points: (1) under baseline conditions, (2) during an acetylcholine and fluid bolus challenge to increase perfusion, (3) initially after switching to isoflurane anesthesia, and (4) after 2 hours of isoflurane anesthesia. In 10 of the 11 swine, a bag of ice was placed on the hilum of 1 kidney at the beginning of isoflurane administration to further reduce perfusion in 1 kidney. RESULTS: Both ASL and microspheres tracked the expected cortical perfusion changes (P < 0.02) across the interventions, including an increase in perfusion during the acetylcholine challenge and decrease during the administration of isoflurane. Both techniques also measured lower cortical perfusion in the iced compared with the non-iced kidneys (P ≤ 0.01). The ASL values were systematically lower compared with microsphere perfusion. Very good correlation (r = 0.81, P < 0.0001) was observed between the techniques, and the relationship appeared linear for perfusion values in the expected physiologic range (microsphere perfusion <550 mL/min/100 g) although ASL values saturated for perfusion >550 mL/min/100 g. CONCLUSION: Cortical perfusion measured with ASL correlated with microspheres and reliably detected changes in renal perfusion in response to physiologic challenge.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of a flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery-arterial spin labeling (FAIR-ASL) technique to track renal perfusion changes during pharmacologic and physiologic alterations in renal blood flow using microspheres as a gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fluorescent microsphere and FAIR-ASL perfusion were compared in the cortex of the kidney for 11 swine across 4 interventional time points: (1) under baseline conditions, (2) during an acetylcholine and fluid bolus challenge to increase perfusion, (3) initially after switching to isoflurane anesthesia, and (4) after 2 hours of isoflurane anesthesia. In 10 of the 11 swine, a bag of ice was placed on the hilum of 1 kidney at the beginning of isoflurane administration to further reduce perfusion in 1 kidney. RESULTS: Both ASL and microspheres tracked the expected cortical perfusion changes (P < 0.02) across the interventions, including an increase in perfusion during the acetylcholine challenge and decrease during the administration of isoflurane. Both techniques also measured lower cortical perfusion in the iced compared with the non-iced kidneys (P ≤ 0.01). The ASL values were systematically lower compared with microsphere perfusion. Very good correlation (r = 0.81, P < 0.0001) was observed between the techniques, and the relationship appeared linear for perfusion values in the expected physiologic range (microsphere perfusion <550 mL/min/100 g) although ASL values saturated for perfusion >550 mL/min/100 g. CONCLUSION: Cortical perfusion measured with ASL correlated with microspheres and reliably detected changes in renal perfusion in response to physiologic challenge.
Authors: Benjamin M Jackson; Joseph H Gorman; Sina L Moainie; T Sloane Guy; Navneet Narula; Jagat Narula; Martin G John-Sutton; L Henry Edmunds; Robert C Gorman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-09-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Andrew L Wentland; Nathan S Artz; Sean B Fain; Thomas M Grist; Arjang Djamali; Elizabeth A Sadowski Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2011-05-28 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Aghogho Odudu; Fabio Nery; Anita A Harteveld; Roger G Evans; Douglas Pendse; Charlotte E Buchanan; Susan T Francis; María A Fernández-Seara Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Cesar A Romero; Glauber Cabral; Robert A Knight; Guangliang Ding; Edward L Peterson; Oscar A Carretero Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2017-10-04
Authors: Alec W Welsh; J Brian Fowlkes; Stephen Z Pinter; Kimberly A Ives; Gabe E Owens; Jonathan M Rubin; Oliver D Kripfgans; Pádraig Looney; Sally L Collins; Gordon N Stevenson Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: General Leung; Anish Kirpalani; Stephen G Szeto; Maya Deeb; Warren Foltz; Craig A Simmons; Darren A Yuen Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Nathan S Artz; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Andrew L Wentland; Arjang Djamali; Thomas M Grist; Songwon Seo; Sean B Fain Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: David J Niles; Nathan S Artz; Arjang Djamali; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Thomas M Grist; Sean B Fain Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Stella K Kang; William C Huang; Samson Wong; Jeff L Zhang; Michael D Stifelman; Mary T Bruno; James S Babb; Vivian S Lee; Hersh Chandarana Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 6.016