PURPOSE: To differentiate healthy kidneys from diseased kidneys, we propose a combined magnetic resonance (MR) examination that includes measurements of renal arterial blood flow and parenchymal perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 130 kidneys (patients/healthy volunteers: 83/47) were examined using renal artery MR flow measurements and renal parenchymal perfusion measurements, as well as contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Cine phase-contrast-flow measurements were performed using an ECG-gated fast low angle shot pulse sequence; perfusion was measured with an arterial spin labeling flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery technique. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography was performed with a fast 3D gradient echo sequence in a single breath hold. For evaluation, kidneys were divided into groups based on nephrologic diagnosis of the patient. Recursive partitioning and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to separate the different groups. RESULTS: Significant differences in mean renal artery flow and parenchymal perfusion were found in kidneys with renal artery stenosis as well as parenchymal disease as compared with healthy kidneys. Using a classification tree derived from the recursive partitioning, a specificity of 99% and sensitivity of 69% with a positive/negative predictive value of 97%/84% was achieved for the separation of healthy kidneys from kidneys with vascular, parenchymal or combined disease. The overall accuracy was 88%. CONCLUSION: The combination of cine PC flow measurements and MR perfusion measurements offers a comprehensive assessment of both renovascular and renoparenchymal disease and provide a noninvasive approach to differentiate between these kidneys and normal kidneys.
PURPOSE: To differentiate healthy kidneys from diseased kidneys, we propose a combined magnetic resonance (MR) examination that includes measurements of renal arterial blood flow and parenchymal perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 130 kidneys (patients/healthy volunteers: 83/47) were examined using renal artery MR flow measurements and renal parenchymal perfusion measurements, as well as contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Cine phase-contrast-flow measurements were performed using an ECG-gated fast low angle shot pulse sequence; perfusion was measured with an arterial spin labeling flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery technique. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography was performed with a fast 3D gradient echo sequence in a single breath hold. For evaluation, kidneys were divided into groups based on nephrologic diagnosis of the patient. Recursive partitioning and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to separate the different groups. RESULTS: Significant differences in mean renal artery flow and parenchymal perfusion were found in kidneys with renal artery stenosis as well as parenchymal disease as compared with healthy kidneys. Using a classification tree derived from the recursive partitioning, a specificity of 99% and sensitivity of 69% with a positive/negative predictive value of 97%/84% was achieved for the separation of healthy kidneys from kidneys with vascular, parenchymal or combined disease. The overall accuracy was 88%. CONCLUSION: The combination of cine PC flow measurements and MR perfusion measurements offers a comprehensive assessment of both renovascular and renoparenchymal disease and provide a noninvasive approach to differentiate between these kidneys and normal kidneys.
Authors: W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Andrew Taylor; Andrew N Hill; José N E Binongo; Amita K Manatunga; Raghuveer Halkar; Eva V Dubovsky; Ernest V Garcia Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Aghogho Odudu; Fabio Nery; Anita A Harteveld; Roger G Evans; Douglas Pendse; Charlotte E Buchanan; Susan T Francis; María A Fernández-Seara Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Nathan S Artz; Andrew L Wentland; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Arjang Djamali; Thomas M Grist; Songwon Seo; Sean B Fain Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Ulrike I Attenberger; John N Morelli; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 5.364