Literature DB >> 22594543

Ocular rigidity: biomechanical role, in vivo measurements and clinical significance.

Efstathios T Detorakis1, Ioannis G Pallikaris.   

Abstract

Ocular rigidity (OR) refers to the relationship between pressure and volume changes in the eyeball. Since the description of the differential tonometry method for the calculation of an OR coefficient by Friedenwald, several other methodologies have been proposed to measure OR, including the anterior chamber manometry, axial length (AL) changes, measurement of pulse amplitude and fundus pulse, ultrasound elastography and evaluation of corneal hysteresis. However, most of these methodologies suffer from deficiencies, such as invasive nature, poor accuracy or reproducibility or technical complexity. Nevertheless, it is possible that OR affects the pathogenesis and clinical course of a variety of ocular conditions, including glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, presbyopia, corneal changes following refractive surgery as well as the accuracy of IOP measurements by many tonometers. Thus, the future development of non-invasive and easy-to-use methodologies for the accurate measurement of OR in the every-day practice would be clinically important.
© 2012 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology © 2012 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22594543     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02809.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  11 in total

1.  Dynamic contour tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lens.

Authors:  Andrew K C Lam; Jimmy S H Tse
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2013-08-28

2.  Influence of LASEK on Schiøtz, Goldmann and dynamic contour Tonometry.

Authors:  Marco Sales-Sanz; Esther Arranz-Marquez; Carolina Arruabarrena; Miguel A Teus
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Estimating outflow facility through pressure dependent pathways of the human eye.

Authors:  David W Smith; Bruce S Gardiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of Aqueous Outflow Facility Measurement by Pneumatonography and Digital Schiøtz Tonography.

Authors:  Arash Kazemi; Jay W McLaren; Shuai-Chun Lin; Carol B Toris; Vikas Gulati; Sayoko E Moroi; Arthur J Sit
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Visual outcomes 24 months after LaserACE.

Authors:  AnnMarie Hipsley; David Hui-Kang Ma; Chi-Chin Sun; Mitchell A Jackson; Daniel Goldberg; Brad Hall
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-16

Review 6.  Scleral surgery for the treatment of presbyopia: where are we today?

Authors:  AnnMarie Hipsley; Brad Hall; Karolinne M Rocha
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-26

7.  Long-term visual outcomes of laser anterior ciliary excision.

Authors:  AnnMarie Hipsley; Brad Hall; Karolinne Maia Rocha
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2018-02-04

8.  A preliminary study on the visual outcomes after LaserACE for presbyopia.

Authors:  Ye Xu; Meiyan Li; Peijun Yao; Ruoyan Wei; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

9.  Correlation between corneal thickness, keratometry, age, and differential pressure difference in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Ahmet Colakoglu; Iffet Emel Colakoglu; Cemile Banu Cosar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties after Long-Term Topical Prostaglandin Therapy.

Authors:  Na Wu; Yuhong Chen; Xiaobo Yu; Mengwei Li; Wen Wen; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.