Literature DB >> 22588129

Spatial heterogeneity in the strength of selection against deleterious alleles and the mutation load.

D Roze1.   

Abstract

According to current estimates of genomic deleterious mutation rates (which are often of the order 0.1-1) the mutation load (defined as a reduction in the average fitness of a population due to the presence of deleterious alleles) may be important in many populations. In this paper, I use multilocus simulations to explore the effect of spatial heterogeneity in the strength of selection against deleterious alleles on the mutation load (for example, it has been suggested that stressful environments may increase the strength of selection). These simulations show contrasted results: in some situations, spatial heterogeneity may greatly reduce the mutation load, due to the fact that migrants coming from demes under stronger selection carry relatively few deleterious alleles, and benefit from a strong advantage within demes under weaker selection (where individuals carry many more deleterious alleles); in other situations, however, deleterious alleles accumulate within demes under stronger selection, due to migration pressure from demes under weaker selection, leading to fitness erosion within those demes. This second situation is more frequent when the productivity of the different demes is proportional to their mean fitness. The effect of spatial heterogeneity is greatly reduced, however, when the response to environmental differences is inconsistent across loci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22588129      PMCID: PMC3424923          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2012.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  34 in total

1.  Selection, load and inbreeding depression in a large metapopulation.

Authors:  Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  General models of multilocus evolution.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Toby Johnson; Nick Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  THE MUTATION LOAD IN SMALL POPULATIONS.

Authors:  M KIMURA; T MARUYAMA; J F CROW
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Joint effects of self-fertilization and population structure on mutation load, inbreeding depression and heterosis.

Authors:  Denis Roze; François Rousset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Recombination and the evolution of diploidy.

Authors:  S P Otto; D B Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Effective size of nonrandom mating populations.

Authors:  A Caballero; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Evolution of plant breeding systems.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Joint evolution of dispersal and inbreeding load.

Authors:  Frédéric Guillaume; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inbreeding depression and the evolution of dispersal rates: a multilocus model.

Authors:  Denis Roze; François Rousset
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Our load of mutations.

Authors:  H J MULLER
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1950-06       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  5 in total

1.  Variation in selective intensity over space alters classic mutation load predictions.

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Epigenetics as a new avenue for the role of inbreeding depression in evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  P-O Cheptou; K Donohue
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Competitive ability of Capsella species with different mating systems and ploidy levels.

Authors:  Sandra Petrone Mendoza; Martin Lascoux; Sylvain Glémin
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  A high load of non-neutral amino-acid polymorphisms explains high protein diversity despite moderate effective population size in a marine bivalve with sweepstakes reproduction.

Authors:  Estelle Harrang; Sylvie Lapègue; Benjamin Morga; Nicolas Bierne
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  The interaction between selection, demography and selfing and how it affects population viability.

Authors:  Diala Abu Awad; Diala Abu Awad; Sophie Gallina; Cyrille Bonamy; Sylvain Billiard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.