Literature DB >> 22588128

Variation in selective intensity over space alters classic mutation load predictions.

A F Agrawal.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22588128      PMCID: PMC3424920          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2012.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Environmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutations?

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.

Authors:  M A Mallet; A K Chippindale
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  The fitness effect of mutations across environments: a survey in light of fitness landscape models.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Charles F Baer; Michael M Miyamoto; Dee R Denver
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Environmental effects on sex differences in the genetic load for adult lifespan in a seed-feeding beetle.

Authors:  C W Fox; R C Stillwell
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Spatial heterogeneity in the strength of selection against deleterious alleles and the mutation load.

Authors:  D Roze
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Dietary stress does not strengthen selection against single deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K MacLellan; L Kwan; M C Whitlock; H D Rundle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  King's formula for the mutation load with epistasis.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The gene interaction component of the genetic load.

Authors:  J L King
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Rates and fitness consequences of new mutations in humans.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.