BACKGROUND: We previously reported the learning curve for open radical prostatectomy, reporting large decreases in recurrence rates with increasing surgeon experience. Here we aim to characterise the learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We did a retrospective cohort study of 4702 patients with prostate cancer treated laparoscopically by one of 29 surgeons from seven institutions in Europe and North America between January, 1998, and June, 2007. Multivariable models were used to assess the association between surgeon experience at the time of each patient's operation and prostate-cancer recurrence, with adjustment for established predictors. FINDINGS: After adjusting for case mix, greater surgeon experience was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (p=0.0053). The 5-year risk of recurrence decreased from 17% to 16% to 9% for a patient treated by a surgeon with 10, 250, and 750 prior laparoscopic procedures, respectively (risk difference between 10 and 750 procedures 8.0%, 95% CI 4.4-12.0). The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was slower than the previously reported learning curve for open surgery (p<0.001). Surgeons with previous experience of open radical prostatectomy had significantly poorer results than those whose first operation was laparoscopic (risk difference 12.3%, 95% CI 8.8-15.7). INTERPRETATION: Increasing surgical experience is associated with substantial reductions in cancer recurrence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, but improvements in outcome seem to accrue more slowly than for open surgery. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy seems to involve skills that do not translate well from open radical prostatectomy. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute, the Allbritton Fund, and the David J Koch Foundation.
BACKGROUND: We previously reported the learning curve for open radical prostatectomy, reporting large decreases in recurrence rates with increasing surgeon experience. Here we aim to characterise the learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We did a retrospective cohort study of 4702 patients with prostate cancer treated laparoscopically by one of 29 surgeons from seven institutions in Europe and North America between January, 1998, and June, 2007. Multivariable models were used to assess the association between surgeon experience at the time of each patient's operation and prostate-cancer recurrence, with adjustment for established predictors. FINDINGS: After adjusting for case mix, greater surgeon experience was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (p=0.0053). The 5-year risk of recurrence decreased from 17% to 16% to 9% for a patient treated by a surgeon with 10, 250, and 750 prior laparoscopic procedures, respectively (risk difference between 10 and 750 procedures 8.0%, 95% CI 4.4-12.0). The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was slower than the previously reported learning curve for open surgery (p<0.001). Surgeons with previous experience of open radical prostatectomy had significantly poorer results than those whose first operation was laparoscopic (risk difference 12.3%, 95% CI 8.8-15.7). INTERPRETATION: Increasing surgical experience is associated with substantial reductions in cancer recurrence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, but improvements in outcome seem to accrue more slowly than for open surgery. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy seems to involve skills that do not translate well from open radical prostatectomy. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute, the Allbritton Fund, and the David J Koch Foundation.
Authors: Marto Sugiono; Dogu Teber; Gabriel Anghel; Ali Serdar Gözen; Christian Stock; Marcel Hruza; Thomas Frede; Jan Klein; Jens J Rassweiler Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2006-11-20 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jennifer F Tseng; Peter W T Pisters; Jeffrey E Lee; Huamin Wang; Henry F Gomez; Charlotte C Sun; Douglas B Evans Journal: Surgery Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Andrew J Vickers; Fernando J Bianco; Mithat Gonen; Angel M Cronin; James A Eastham; Deborah Schrag; Eric A Klein; Alwyn M Reuther; Michael W Kattan; J Edson Pontes; Peter T Scardino Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Fernando P Secin; Thomas Jiborn; Anders S Bjartell; Georges Fournier; Laurent Salomon; Clément Claude Abbou; George P Haber; Inderbir S Gill; Laura E Crocitto; Rebecca A Nelson; José R Cansino Alcaide; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro; Michael S Cohen; Ingolf Tuerk; Claude Schulman; Troy Gianduzzo; Christopher Eden; Roxelyn Baumgartner; Joseph A Smith; Kim Entezari; Roland van Velthoven; Gunter Janetschek; Angel M Serio; Andrew J Vickers; Karim Touijer; Bertrand Guillonneau Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2007-06-11 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Andrew J Vickers; Fernando J Bianco; Angel M Serio; James A Eastham; Deborah Schrag; Eric A Klein; Alwyn M Reuther; Michael W Kattan; J Edson Pontes; Peter T Scardino Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2007-07-24 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Andrew J Vickers; Caroline J Savage; Fernando J Bianco; Eric A Klein; Michael W Kattan; Fernando P Secin; Bertrand D Guilloneau; Peter T Scardino Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Andrew J Vickers; Daniel Sjoberg; Ethan Basch; Frank Sculli; Marwan Shouery; Vincent Laudone; Karim Touijer; James Eastham; Peter T Scardino Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 20.096