Literature DB >> 22571890

Risk as feelings in the effect of patient outcomes on physicians' future treatment decisions: a randomized trial and manipulation validation.

Joshua A Hemmerich1, Arthur S Elstein, Margaret L Schwarze, Elizabeth Ghini Moliski, William Dale.   

Abstract

The present study tested predictions derived from the Risk as Feelings hypothesis about the effects of prior patients' negative treatment outcomes on physicians' subsequent treatment decisions. Two experiments at The University of Chicago, U.S.A., utilized a computer simulation of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patient with enhanced realism to present participants with one of three experimental conditions: AAA rupture causing a watchful waiting death (WWD), perioperative death (PD), or a successful operation (SO), as well as the statistical treatment guidelines for AAA. Experiment 1 tested effects of these simulated outcomes on (n = 76) laboratory participants' (university student sample) self-reported emotions, and their ratings of valence and arousal of the AAA rupture simulation and other emotion-inducing picture stimuli. Experiment 2 tested two hypotheses: 1) that experiencing a patient WWD in the practice trial's experimental condition would lead physicians to choose surgery earlier, and 2) experiencing a patient PD would lead physicians to choose surgery later with the next patient. Experiment 2 presented (n = 132) physicians (surgeons and geriatricians) with the same experimental manipulation and a second simulated AAA patient. Physicians then chose to either go to surgery or continue watchful waiting. The results of Experiment 1 demonstrated that the WWD experimental condition significantly increased anxiety, and was rated similarly to other negative and arousing pictures. The results of Experiment 2 demonstrated that, after controlling for demographics, baseline anxiety, intolerance for uncertainty, risk attitudes, and the influence of simulation characteristics, the WWD experimental condition significantly expedited decisions to choose surgery for the next patient. The results support the Risk as Feelings hypothesis on physicians' treatment decisions in a realistic AAA patient computer simulation. Bad outcomes affected emotions and decisions, even with statistical AAA rupture risk guidance present. These results suggest that bad patient outcomes cause physicians to experience anxiety and regret that influences their subsequent treatment decision-making for the next patient.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22571890      PMCID: PMC4030752          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  23 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).

Authors:  C W Lejuez; Jennifer P Read; Christopher W Kahler; Jerry B Richards; Susan E Ramsey; Gregory L Stuart; David R Strong; Richard A Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2002-06

3.  Affect, risk, and decision making.

Authors:  Paul Slovic; Ellen Peters; Melissa L Finucane; Donald G Macgregor
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 4.  Literature review of surgical management of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  A Hallin; D Bergqvist; L Holmberg
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.069

5.  Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, a permanent challenge or a waste of resources? Prediction of outcome using a multi-organ-dysfunction score.

Authors:  H W Kniemeyer; T Kessler; P U Reber; H B Ris; H Hakki; M K Widmer
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  Can induced anxiety from a negative earlier experience influence vascular surgeons' statistical decision-making? A randomized field experiment with an abdominal aortic aneurysm analog.

Authors:  William Dale; Joshua Hemmerich; Elizabeth A Ghini; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 7.  Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  David C Brewster; Jack L Cronenwett; John W Hallett; K Wayne Johnston; William C Krupski; Jon S Matsumura
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).

Authors:  T M Marteau; H Bekker
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-09

9.  Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair.

Authors:  Frank A Lederle; Gary R Johnson; Samuel E Wilson; David J Ballard; William D Jordan; John Blebea; Fred N Littooy; Julie A Freischlag; Dennis Bandyk; Joseph H Rapp; Atef A Salam
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Validation of a decision regret scale.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Annette M O'Connor; Timothy J Wood; Thomas F Hack; Laura Siminoff; Elisa Gordon; Deb Feldman-Stewart
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  5 in total

1.  Feasibility of Population Health Analytics and Data Visualization for Decision Support in the Infectious Diseases Domain: A pilot study.

Authors:  Don Roosan; Guilherme Del Fiol; Jorie Butler; Yarden Livnat; Jeanmarie Mayer; Matthew Samore; Makoto Jones; Charlene Weir
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Effect of specialty and recent experience on perioperative decision-making for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  William Dale; Joshua Hemmerich; Elizabeth Moliski; Margaret L Schwarze; Avery Tung
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  'I'm not a chance taker': A mixed methods exploration of factors affecting prostate cancer treatment decision-making.

Authors:  Otis L Owens; Robin M Estrada; Kim Johnson; Micheal Cogdell; Daniel B Fried; Lucy Gansauer; Simon Kim
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Real-World Effectiveness of Intravenous Stroke Thrombolysis is more than the Expectation of Practicing Neurologists.

Authors:  Fazal Ghafoor; Firosh Khan; Abdulkhader Shehna
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

5.  Rational decision making in medicine: Implications for overuse and underuse.

Authors:  Benjamin Djulbegovic; Shira Elqayam; William Dale
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.431

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.