Literature DB >> 12756363

Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery.

David C Brewster1, Jack L Cronenwett, John W Hallett, K Wayne Johnston, William C Krupski, Jon S Matsumura.   

Abstract

Decision-making in regard to elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) requires careful assessment of factors that influence rupture risk, operative mortality, and life expectancy. Individualized consideration of these factors in each patient is essential, and the role of patient preference is of increasing importance. It is not possible or appropriate to recommend a single threshold diameter for intervention which can be generalized to all patients. Based upon the best available current evidence, 5.5 cm is the best threshold for repair in an "average" patient. However, subsets of younger, good-risk patients or aneurysms at higher rupture risk may be identified in whom repair at smaller sizes is justified. Conversely, delay in repair until larger diameter may be best for older, higher-risk patients, especially if endovascular repair is not possible. Intervention at diameter <5.5 cm appears indicated in women with AAA. If a patient has suitable anatomy, endovascular repair may be considered, and it is most advantageous for older, higher-risk patients or patients with a hostile abdomen or other technical factors that may complicate standard open repair. With endovascular repair, perioperative morbidity and recovery time are clearly reduced; however, there is a higher reintervention rate, increased surveillance burden, and a small but ongoing risk of AAA rupture. There is no justification at present for different indications for endovascular repair, such as earlier treatment of smaller AAA. Until long-term outcome of endoluminal repair is better defined and results of randomized trials available, the choice between endovascular and open repair will continue to rely heavily on patient preference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12756363     DOI: 10.1067/mva.2003.363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  120 in total

1.  Informed consent for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: assessing variations in surgeon opinion through a national survey.

Authors:  Loren Berman; Alan Dardik; Elizabeth H Bradley; Richard J Gusberg; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Risk as feelings in the effect of patient outcomes on physicians' future treatment decisions: a randomized trial and manipulation validation.

Authors:  Joshua A Hemmerich; Arthur S Elstein; Margaret L Schwarze; Elizabeth Ghini Moliski; William Dale
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Current status of the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Linda J Wang; Anand M Prabhakar; Christopher J Kwolek
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

Review 4.  Type II endoleaks: diagnosis and treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Yolanda Bryce; Brian Schiro; Kyle Cooper; Suvranu Ganguli; Mamdouh Khayat; Cuong Ken Lam; Rahmi Oklu; Geogy Vatakencherry; Ripal T Gandhi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

5.  Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm presentation, repair, and mortality in the Vascular Study Group of New England.

Authors:  Ruby C Lo; Rodney P Bensley; Allen D Hamdan; Mark Wyers; Julie E Adams; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: time-trends during a 20-year period.

Authors:  Camilla Berge; Erik S Haug; Pål R Romundstad; Conrad Lange; Hans O Myhre
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Impact of contrast injection and stent-graft implantation on reproducibility of volume measurements in semiautomated segmentation of abdominal aortic aneurysm on computed tomography.

Authors:  Florence Morin-Roy; Claude Kauffmann; An Tang; Sofiane Hadjadj; Olivier Thomas; Nicolas Piché; Stéphane Elkouri; Dan Yang Yang; Éric Therasse; Gilles Soulez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Biomechanical Rupture Risk Assessment: A Consistent and Objective Decision-Making Tool for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients.

Authors:  T Christian Gasser
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2016-04-01

Review 9.  Advances and Future Direction of Magnetic Resonance Elastography.

Authors:  Huiming Dong; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

10.  Defining high-risk patients for endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Natalia Egorova; Jeannine K Giacovelli; Annetine Gelijns; Giampaolo Greco; Alan Moskowitz; James McKinsey; K Craig Kent
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.