BACKGROUND: Increasing detection, new screening recommendations, and popular press attention contribute to the rising prevalence of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Evidence-based guidelines recommend the optimal time to operate is when the aneurysm is 5.5 cm in diameter. Smaller AAAs are periodically monitored with imaging. Recent events and emotional reactions to risk and uncertainty, including anxiety, can cause decision-making to diverge from cognitively based assessments. It is not known whether this applies to vascular surgeons making statistically-optimal, risky decisions. We tested whether an unexpected, recent negative event might influence vascular surgeons' decisions about a computer-simulation AAA-analog that includes statistical information. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a randomized, computer-based field experiment with evidenced-based statistical information readily available on bursting probabilities. Participants included vascular surgeons with AAA operative experience attending two vascular surgery conferences held in 2005 (n=81). The intervention was a randomly assigned, anxiety-inducing, bursting balloon versus a nonbursting balloon before a statistical decision-making computer simulation. The main outcomes measure was real-time prospective choice to opt out of expanding AAA simulation. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the likelihood of opting out, while controlling for important covariates. RESULTS: The experimental group was more likely to opt out (hazard ratio: 3.32; 95% CI: 1.25 to 8.81), even after controlling for initial anxiety levels, risk attitudes, uncertainty attitudes, use of statistical information, surgical experience, and demographics. CONCLUSIONS: Experiencing a negative, potentially anxiety-provoking, preceding event can influence decision-making, even among experienced vascular surgeons who have ready access to statistical risk information.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Increasing detection, new screening recommendations, and popular press attention contribute to the rising prevalence of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Evidence-based guidelines recommend the optimal time to operate is when the aneurysm is 5.5 cm in diameter. Smaller AAAs are periodically monitored with imaging. Recent events and emotional reactions to risk and uncertainty, including anxiety, can cause decision-making to diverge from cognitively based assessments. It is not known whether this applies to vascular surgeons making statistically-optimal, risky decisions. We tested whether an unexpected, recent negative event might influence vascular surgeons' decisions about a computer-simulation AAA-analog that includes statistical information. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a randomized, computer-based field experiment with evidenced-based statistical information readily available on bursting probabilities. Participants included vascular surgeons with AAA operative experience attending two vascular surgery conferences held in 2005 (n=81). The intervention was a randomly assigned, anxiety-inducing, bursting balloon versus a nonbursting balloon before a statistical decision-making computer simulation. The main outcomes measure was real-time prospective choice to opt out of expanding AAA simulation. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the likelihood of opting out, while controlling for important covariates. RESULTS: The experimental group was more likely to opt out (hazard ratio: 3.32; 95% CI: 1.25 to 8.81), even after controlling for initial anxiety levels, risk attitudes, uncertainty attitudes, use of statistical information, surgical experience, and demographics. CONCLUSIONS: Experiencing a negative, potentially anxiety-provoking, preceding event can influence decision-making, even among experienced vascular surgeons who have ready access to statistical risk information.
Authors: Joshua A Hemmerich; Arthur S Elstein; Margaret L Schwarze; Elizabeth Ghini Moliski; William Dale Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Clara Nan-Hi Lee; Peter Anthony Ubel; Allison M Deal; Lillian Burdick Blizard; Karen R Sepucha; David W Ollila; Michael Patrick Pignone Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: William Dale; Joshua Hemmerich; Elizabeth Moliski; Margaret L Schwarze; Avery Tung Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Vlad V Simianu; Anirban Basu; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Richard C Thirlby; Abraham D Flaxman; David R Flum Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Mark K Ferguson; Jeanne Farnan; Josh A Hemmerich; Kris Slawinski; Julissa Acevedo; Stephen Small Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 4.330