PURPOSE: We evaluated the relationship between cone photoreceptor packing density and outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness within the central 15 degrees. METHODS: Individual differences for healthy subjects in cone packing density and ONL thickness were examined in 8 younger and 8 older subjects, mean age 27.2 versus 56.2 years. Cone packing density was obtained using an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AOSLO). The ONL thickness measurements included the ONL and the Henle fiber layer (ONL + HFL), and were obtained using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) and custom segmentation software. RESULTS: There were sizeable individual differences in cone packing density and ONL + HFL thickness. Older subjects had on average lower cone packing densities, but thicker ONL + HFL measurements. Cone packing density and ONL + HFL thickness decreased with increasing retinal eccentricity. The ratio of the cone packing density-to-ONL2 was larger for the younger subjects group, and decreased with retinal eccentricity. CONCLUSIONS: The individual differences in cone packing density and ONL + HFL thickness are consistent with aging changes, indicating that normative aging data are necessary for fine comparisons in the early stages of disease or response to treatment. Our finding of ONL + HFL thickness increasing with aging is inconsistent with the hypothesis that ONL measurements with SDOCT depend only on the number of functioning cones, since in our older group cones were fewer, but thickness was greater.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the relationship between cone photoreceptor packing density and outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness within the central 15 degrees. METHODS: Individual differences for healthy subjects in cone packing density and ONL thickness were examined in 8 younger and 8 older subjects, mean age 27.2 versus 56.2 years. Cone packing density was obtained using an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AOSLO). The ONL thickness measurements included the ONL and the Henle fiber layer (ONL + HFL), and were obtained using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) and custom segmentation software. RESULTS: There were sizeable individual differences in cone packing density and ONL + HFL thickness. Older subjects had on average lower cone packing densities, but thicker ONL + HFL measurements. Cone packing density and ONL + HFL thickness decreased with increasing retinal eccentricity. The ratio of the cone packing density-to-ONL2 was larger for the younger subjects group, and decreased with retinal eccentricity. CONCLUSIONS: The individual differences in cone packing density and ONL + HFL thickness are consistent with aging changes, indicating that normative aging data are necessary for fine comparisons in the early stages of disease or response to treatment. Our finding of ONL + HFL thickness increasing with aging is inconsistent with the hypothesis that ONL measurements with SDOCT depend only on the number of functioning cones, since in our older group cones were fewer, but thickness was greater.
Authors: Hongxin Song; Toco Yuen Ping Chui; Zhangyi Zhong; Ann E Elsner; Stephen A Burns Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Tomas S Aleman; Artur V Cideciyan; Alexander Sumaroka; Elizabeth A M Windsor; Waldo Herrera; D Alan White; Shalesh Kaushal; Anjani Naidu; Alejandro J Roman; Sharon B Schwartz; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Austin S Jelcick; Yang Yuan; Barrett D Leehy; Lakeisha C Cox; Alexandra C Silveira; Fang Qiu; Sarah Schenk; Andrew J Sachs; Margaux A Morrison; Arne M Nystuen; Margaret M DeAngelis; Neena B Haider Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dean A VanNasdale; Ann E Elsner; Todd D Peabody; Kimberly D Kohne; Victor E Malinovsky; Bryan P Haggerty; Anke Weber; Christopher A Clark; Stephen A Burns Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Brandon J Lujan; Austin Roorda; Jason A Croskrey; Adam M Dubis; Robert F Cooper; Jan-Kristine Bayabo; Jacque L Duncan; Bhavna J Antony; Joseph Carroll Journal: Retina Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Kristan S Worthington; Luke A Wiley; Emily E Kaalberg; Malia M Collins; Robert F Mullins; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Edmund Arthur; Stuart B Young; Ann E Elsner; Karthikeyan Baskaran; Joel A Papay; Matthew S Muller; Thomas J Gast; Bryan P Haggerty; Christopher A Clark; Victor E Malinovsky; Shane G Brahm; Taras V Litvin; Glen Y Ozawa; Jorge A Cuadros Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Stephen A Burns; Ann E Elsner; Kaitlyn A Sapoznik; Raymond L Warner; Thomas J Gast Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 21.198