SIGNIFICANCE: The pathological changes in clinically significant diabetic macular edema lead to greater retinal thickening in men than in women. Therefore, male sex should be considered a potential risk factor for identifying individuals with the most severe pathological changes. Understanding this excessive retinal thickening in men may help preserve vision. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the sex differences in retinal thickness in diabetic patients. We tested whether men with clinically significant macular edema had even greater central macular thickness than expected from sex differences without significant pathological changes. This study also aimed to determine which retinal layers contribute to abnormal retinal thickness. METHODS: From 2047 underserved adult diabetic patients from Alameda County, CA, 142 patients with clinically significant macular edema were identified by EyePACS-certified graders using color fundus images (Canon CR6-45NM). First, central macular thickness from spectral domain optical coherence tomography (iVue; Optovue Inc.) was compared in 21 men versus 21 women without clinically significant macular edema. Then, a planned comparison contrasted the greater values of central macular thickness in men versus women with clinically significant macular edema as compared with those without. Mean retinal thickness and variability of central macular layers were compared in men versus women. RESULTS: Men without clinically significant macular edema had a 12-μm greater central macular thickness than did women (245 ± 21.3 and 233 ± 13.4 μm, respectively; t40 = -2.18, P = .04). Men with clinically significant macular edema had a 67-μm greater central macular thickness than did women (383 ± 48.7 and 316 ± 60.4 μm, P < .001); that is, men had 55 μm or more than five times more (t20 = 2.35, P = .02). In men, the outer-nuclear-layer thickness was more variable, F10,10 = 9.34. CONCLUSIONS: Underserved diabetic men had thicker retinas than did women, exacerbated by clinically significant macular edema.
SIGNIFICANCE: The pathological changes in clinically significant diabetic macular edema lead to greater retinal thickening in men than in women. Therefore, male sex should be considered a potential risk factor for identifying individuals with the most severe pathological changes. Understanding this excessive retinal thickening in men may help preserve vision. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the sex differences in retinal thickness in diabeticpatients. We tested whether men with clinically significant macular edema had even greater central macular thickness than expected from sex differences without significant pathological changes. This study also aimed to determine which retinal layers contribute to abnormal retinal thickness. METHODS: From 2047 underserved adult diabeticpatients from Alameda County, CA, 142 patients with clinically significant macular edema were identified by EyePACS-certified graders using color fundus images (Canon CR6-45NM). First, central macular thickness from spectral domain optical coherence tomography (iVue; Optovue Inc.) was compared in 21 men versus 21 women without clinically significant macular edema. Then, a planned comparison contrasted the greater values of central macular thickness in men versus women with clinically significant macular edema as compared with those without. Mean retinal thickness and variability of central macular layers were compared in men versus women. RESULTS:Men without clinically significant macular edema had a 12-μm greater central macular thickness than did women (245 ± 21.3 and 233 ± 13.4 μm, respectively; t40 = -2.18, P = .04). Men with clinically significant macular edema had a 67-μm greater central macular thickness than did women (383 ± 48.7 and 316 ± 60.4 μm, P < .001); that is, men had 55 μm or more than five times more (t20 = 2.35, P = .02). In men, the outer-nuclear-layer thickness was more variable, F10,10 = 9.34. CONCLUSIONS: Underserved diabeticmen had thicker retinas than did women, exacerbated by clinically significant macular edema.
Authors: Toco Y P Chui; Hongxin Song; Christopher A Clark; Joel A Papay; Stephen A Burns; Ann E Elsner Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-06-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Taras V Litvin; Glen Y Ozawa; George H Bresnick; Jorge A Cuadros; Matthew S Muller; Ann E Elsner; Thomas J Gast Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Wendy W Harrison; Marcus A Bearse; Marilyn E Schneck; Brian E Wolff; Nicholas P Jewell; Shirin Barez; Andrew B Mick; Bernard J Dolan; Anthony J Adams Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: David J Browning; Adam R Glassman; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Roy W Beck; David M Brown; Donald S Fong; Neil M Bressler; Ronald P Danis; James L Kinyoun; Quan Dong Nguyen; Abdhish R Bhavsar; Justin Gottlieb; Dante J Pieramici; Michael E Rauser; Rajendra S Apte; Jennifer I Lim; Päivi H Miskala Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ann E Elsner; Benno L Petrig; Joel A Papay; Elli J Kollbaum; Christopher A Clark; Matthew S Muller Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Kakarla V Chalam; Susan B Bressler; Allison R Edwards; Brian B Berger; Neil M Bressler; Adam R Glassman; Sandeep Grover; Shailesh K Gupta; Jared S Nielsen Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Joanne W Y Yau; Sophie L Rogers; Ryo Kawasaki; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Jonathan W Kowalski; Toke Bek; Shih-Jen Chen; Jacqueline M Dekker; Astrid Fletcher; Jakob Grauslund; Steven Haffner; Richard F Hamman; M Kamran Ikram; Takamasa Kayama; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Sannapaneni Krishnaiah; Korapat Mayurasakorn; Joseph P O'Hare; Trevor J Orchard; Massimo Porta; Mohan Rema; Monique S Roy; Tarun Sharma; Jonathan Shaw; Hugh Taylor; James M Tielsch; Rohit Varma; Jie Jin Wang; Ningli Wang; Sheila West; Liang Xu; Miho Yasuda; Xinzhi Zhang; Paul Mitchell; Tien Y Wong Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Mastour A Alhamami; Ann E Elsner; Victor E Malinovsky; Christopher A Clark; Bryan P Haggerty; Glen Y Ozawa; Jorge A Cuadros; Karthikeyan Baskaran; Thomas J Gast; Taras V Litvin; Matthew S Muller; Shane G Brahm; Stuart B Young; Masahiro Miura Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Delaram Mirzania; Atalie C Thompson; Cason B Robbins; Srinath Soundararajan; Jia Min Lee; Rupesh Agrawal; Andy J Liu; Kim G Johnson; Dilraj S Grewal; Sharon Fekrat Journal: Ophthalmol Sci Date: 2021-12-20
Authors: Victoria Y Wang; Blanche L Kuo; Andrew X Chen; Kevin Wang; Tyler E Greenlee; Thais F Conti; Rishi P Singh Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 4.456