Literature DB >> 22570196

Effects of MRI scan acceleration on brain volume measurement consistency.

Gunnar Krueger1, Cristina Granziera, Clifford R Jack, Jeffrey L Gunter, Arne Littmann, Bénédicte Mortamet, Stephan Kannengiesser, Alma Gregory Sorensen, Chadwick P Ward, Denise A Reyes, Paula J Britson, Hubertus Fischer, Matt A Bernstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiofrequency (RF) coil and parallel imaging technology on brain volume measurement consistency.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 103 whole-brain MRI volumes were acquired at a clinical 3T MRI, equipped with a 12- and 32-channel head coil, using the T1-weighted protocol as employed in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study with parallel imaging accelerations ranging from 1 to 5. An experienced reader performed qualitative ratings of the images. For quantitative analysis, differences in composite width (CW, a measure of image similarity) and boundary shift integral (BSI, a measure of whole-brain atrophy) were calculated.
RESULTS: Intra- and intersession comparisons of CW and BSI measures from scans with equal acceleration demonstrated excellent scan-rescan accuracy, even at the highest acceleration applied. Pairs-of-scans acquired with different accelerations exhibited poor scan-rescan consistency only when differences in the acceleration factor were maximized. A change in the coil hardware between compared scans was found to bias the BSI measure.
CONCLUSION: The most important findings are that the accelerated acquisitions appear to be compatible with the assessment of high-quality quantitative information and that for highest scan-rescan accuracy in serial scans the acquisition protocol should be kept as consistent as possible over time.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22570196      PMCID: PMC3432691          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  32 in total

1.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Krüger; A Kastrup; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience.

Authors:  M A Bernstein; J Huston; C Lin; G F Gibbs; J P Felmlee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  32-channel 3 Tesla receive-only phased-array head coil with soccer-ball element geometry.

Authors:  G C Wiggins; C Triantafyllou; A Potthast; A Reykowski; M Nittka; L L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils.

Authors:  Richard G Boyes; Jeff L Gunter; Chris Frost; Andrew L Janke; Thomas Yeatman; Derek L G Hill; Matt A Bernstein; Paul M Thompson; Michael W Weiner; Norbert Schuff; Gene E Alexander; Ronald J Killiany; Charles DeCarli; Clifford R Jack; Nick C Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Neuroimaging in dementia.

Authors:  Jennifer L Whitwell; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Progressive brain atrophy on serial MRI in dementia with Lewy bodies, AD, and vascular dementia.

Authors:  J T O'Brien; S Paling; R Barber; E D Williams; C Ballard; I G McKeith; A Gholkar; W R Crum; M N Rossor; N C Fox
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Alzheimer's disease diagnosis in individual subjects using structural MR images: validation studies.

Authors:  Prashanthi Vemuri; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; Jennifer L Whitwell; Kejal Kantarci; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Interpreting scan data acquired from multiple scanners: a study with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Cynthia M Stonnington; Geoffrey Tan; Stefan Klöppel; Carlton Chu; Bogdan Draganski; Clifford R Jack; Kewei Chen; John Ashburner; Richard S J Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Longitudinal stability of MRI for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry.

Authors:  Alex D Leow; Andrea D Klunder; Clifford R Jack; Arthur W Toga; Anders M Dale; Matt A Bernstein; Paula J Britson; Jeffrey L Gunter; Chadwick P Ward; Jennifer L Whitwell; Bret J Borowski; Adam S Fleisher; Nick C Fox; Danielle Harvey; John Kornak; Norbert Schuff; Colin Studholme; Gene E Alexander; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  11 in total

1.  Two-dimensional accelerated MP-RAGE imaging with flexible linear reordering.

Authors:  Daniel Brenner; Rüdiger Stirnberg; Eberhard D Pracht; Tony Stöcker
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Feasibility of accelerated 3D T1-weighted MRI using compressed sensing: application to quantitative volume measurements of human brain structures.

Authors:  Uten Yarach; Suwit Saekho; Kawin Setsompop; Atita Suwannasak; Ratthaporn Boonsuth; Kittichai Wantanajittikul; Salita Angkurawaranon; Chaisiri Angkurawaranon; Prapatsorn Sangpin
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Translational application of neuroimaging in major depressive disorder: a review of psychoradiological studies.

Authors:  Ziqi Chen; Xiaoqi Huang; Qiyong Gong; Bharat B Biswal
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  Reproducibility and variability of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging markers in cerebral small vessel disease.

Authors:  François De Guio; Eric Jouvent; Geert Jan Biessels; Sandra E Black; Carol Brayne; Christopher Chen; Charlotte Cordonnier; Frank-Eric De Leeuw; Martin Dichgans; Fergus Doubal; Marco Duering; Carole Dufouil; Emrah Duzel; Franz Fazekas; Vladimir Hachinski; M Arfan Ikram; Jennifer Linn; Paul M Matthews; Bernard Mazoyer; Vincent Mok; Bo Norrving; John T O'Brien; Leonardo Pantoni; Stefan Ropele; Perminder Sachdev; Reinhold Schmidt; Sudha Seshadri; Eric E Smith; Luciano A Sposato; Blossom Stephan; Richard H Swartz; Christophe Tzourio; Mark van Buchem; Aad van der Lugt; Robert van Oostenbrugge; Meike W Vernooij; Anand Viswanathan; David Werring; Frank Wollenweber; Joanna M Wardlaw; Hugues Chabriat
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Does MRI scan acceleration affect power to track brain change?

Authors:  Christopher R K Ching; Xue Hua; Derrek P Hibar; Chadwick P Ward; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matt A Bernstein; Clifford R Jack; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Accelerated vs. unaccelerated serial MRI based TBM-SyN measurements for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Prashanthi Vemuri; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Emily S Lundt; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Stephen D Weigand; Bret J Borowski; Matt A Bernstein; Samantha M Zuk; Val J Lowe; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Nick C Fox; Paul M Thompson; Michael W Weiner; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Effects of changing from non-accelerated to accelerated MRI for follow-up in brain atrophy measurement.

Authors:  Kelvin K Leung; Ian M Malone; Sebastien Ourselin; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matt A Bernstein; Paul M Thompson; Clifford R Jack; Michael W Weiner; Nick C Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset.

Authors:  Emily N Manning; Kelvin K Leung; Jennifer M Nicholas; Ian B Malone; M Jorge Cardoso; Jonathan M Schott; Nick C Fox; Josephine Barnes
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2017-04

9.  Neuroharmony: A new tool for harmonizing volumetric MRI data from unseen scanners.

Authors:  Rafael Garcia-Dias; Cristina Scarpazza; Lea Baecker; Sandra Vieira; Walter H L Pinaya; Aiden Corvin; Alberto Redolfi; Barnaby Nelson; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro; Colm McDonald; Diana Tordesillas-Gutiérrez; Dara Cannon; David Mothersill; Dennis Hernaus; Derek Morris; Esther Setien-Suero; Gary Donohoe; Giovanni Frisoni; Giulia Tronchin; João Sato; Machteld Marcelis; Matthew Kempton; Neeltje E M van Haren; Oliver Gruber; Patrick McGorry; Paul Amminger; Philip McGuire; Qiyong Gong; René S Kahn; Rosa Ayesa-Arriola; Therese van Amelsvoort; Victor Ortiz-García de la Foz; Vince Calhoun; Wiepke Cahn; Andrea Mechelli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Applying Automated MR-Based Diagnostic Methods to the Memory Clinic: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Stefan Klöppel; Jessica Peter; Anna Ludl; Anne Pilatus; Sabrina Maier; Irina Mader; Bernhard Heimbach; Lars Frings; Karl Egger; Juergen Dukart; Matthias L Schroeter; Robert Perneczky; Peter Häussermann; Werner Vach; Horst Urbach; Stefan Teipel; Michael Hüll; Ahmed Abdulkadir
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.