Literature DB >> 22569591

Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.

Marco A C Neves1, Maxim Totrov, Ruben Abagyan.   

Abstract

Flexible docking and scoring using the internal coordinate mechanics software (ICM) was benchmarked for ligand binding mode prediction against the 85 co-crystal structures in the modified Astex data set. The ICM virtual ligand screening was tested against the 40 DUD target benchmarks and 11-target WOMBAT sets. The self-docking accuracy was evaluated for the top 1 and top 3 scoring poses at each ligand binding site with near native conformations below 2 Å RMSD found in 91 and 95% of the predictions, respectively. The virtual ligand screening using single rigid pocket conformations provided the median area under the ROC curves equal to 69.4 with 22.0% true positives recovered at 2% false positive rate. Significant improvements up to ROC AUC = 82.2 and ROC((2%)) = 45.2 were achieved following our best practices for flexible pocket refinement and out-of-pocket binding rescore. The virtual screening can be further improved by considering multiple conformations of the target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22569591      PMCID: PMC3398187          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-012-9547-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  51 in total

Review 1.  Prediction of the binding energy for small molecules, peptides and proteins.

Authors:  M Schapira; M Totrov; R Abagyan
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.137

2.  pK(a) based protonation states and microspecies for protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  Tim ten Brink; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Ligand-protein docking with water molecules.

Authors:  Benjamin C Roberts; Ricardo L Mancera
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection?

Authors:  Andrew C Good; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  In search of allosteric modulators of a7-nAChR by solvent density guided virtual screening.

Authors:  Raja Dey; Lin Chen
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2011-04

6.  Structural basis for inhibition promiscuity of dual specific thrombin and factor Xa blood coagulation inhibitors.

Authors:  H Nar; M Bauer; A Schmid; J M Stassen; W Wienen; H W Priepke; I K Kauffmann; U J Ries; N H Hauel
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2001-01-10       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  In silico screening for PTPN22 inhibitors: active hits from an inactive phosphatase conformation.

Authors:  Shuangding Wu; Massimo Bottini; Robert C Rickert; Tomas Mustelin; Lutz Tautz
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Discovery of potent thermolysin inhibitors using structure based virtual screening and binding assays.

Authors:  Mahmud Tareq Hassan Khan; Ole-Martin Fuskevåg; Ingebrigt Sylte
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Pocketome: an encyclopedia of small-molecule binding sites in 4D.

Authors:  Irina Kufareva; Andrey V Ilatovskiy; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Binding site of ABC transporter homology models confirmed by ABCB1 crystal structure.

Authors:  Aina W Ravna; Ingebrigt Sylte; Georg Sager
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.432

View more
  92 in total

1.  Amino acid substitutions in the human homomeric β3 GABAA receptor that enable activation by GABA.

Authors:  Carla Gottschald Chiodi; Daniel T Baptista-Hon; William N Hunter; Tim G Hales
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Receptor-ligand molecular docking.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Camila S de Magalhães; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-12-21

3.  Hybrid receptor structure/ligand-based docking and activity prediction in ICM: development and evaluation in D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Authors:  Polo C-H Lam; Ruben Abagyan; Maxim Totrov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  A consistent description of HYdrogen bond and DEhydration energies in protein-ligand complexes: methods behind the HYDE scoring function.

Authors:  Nadine Schneider; Gudrun Lange; Sally Hindle; Robert Klein; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  An integrated approach to knowledge-driven structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Angela M Henzler; Sascha Urbaczek; Matthias Hilbig; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Docking to multiple pockets or ligand fields for screening, activity prediction and scaffold hopping.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Chen; Max Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.808

7.  Difluoromethyl ketones: Potent inhibitors of wild type and carbamate-insensitive G119S mutant Anopheles gambiae acetylcholinesterase.

Authors:  Eugene Camerino; Dawn M Wong; Fan Tong; Florian Körber; Aaron D Gross; Rafique Islam; Elisabet Viayna; James M Mutunga; Jianyong Li; Maxim M Totrov; Jeffrey R Bloomquist; Paul R Carlier
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Structure-based predictions of activity cliffs.

Authors:  Jarmila Husby; Giovanni Bottegoni; Irina Kufareva; Ruben Abagyan; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.608

10.  Docking challenge: protein sampling and molecular docking performance.

Authors:  Khaled M Elokely; Robert J Doerksen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.